In order to accept your facts I would have to believe three things:
1. your particular 750ti's can't perform to the same level as any others,
2. for some unique reason you don't suffer the 10% loss in performance between 6.5 and 7.5 that anyone else experiences,
3. it's just a coincidence that your hash rates are lower by the same amount of degradation expected between 6.5 and 7.5.
If it was happening to me and potentially costing me 300 KH per card I'd want to get to the bottom of it.
that is what im saying joblo ...
its not contradictory at all ...
my cards did just below 2800KH on c6.5 compile on f20x64 - now they do a little over 2800KH on c7.5 compiled on f22x64 ... these cards NEVER did 3100KH on ANY of my systems ... period ...
so contradictory to OTHERS or not - MY systems are doing this ... thats it ...
i can allow YOU access to prove it mate - as i trust YOU ( and only a very few others on here ) if you would like to try and compile for yourself in MY systems ... i can allocate one machine and you can have a go ... THEN tell me how contradictory it is when you see the SAME results as i do ...
my offer is open mate ...
#crysx
Thanks for the offer but I wouldn't accept it unless it would help solve the dilema, not just to prove it. Also you're
getting the expected performance of cuda 7.5 on a 750ti so there may be little for you to gain by pursuing this issue.
I looked at the clock specs for the GB LP card and they are about 10% lower than my EVGAs so that can account
for your lower baseline.
With that variable eliminated it leads me to my real pet peeve, the lower performance with cuda 7.5 vs 6.5. It still
baffles me that Nvidia would do this with apparently no effort to either fix it, provide a compatibility mode, or continue
to support 6.5.
I think I need to do some testing of cuda 7.5, maybre things are improving.
EDIT:
I have tested cuda 6.5 vs 7.5 on Centos 6.7, driver 352.63, with 2 EVGA GTX 750ti SC standard clocks, mining x11.
Each card produces different hash rates:
GPU0: 6.5 3085
7.5 3015
GPU 1: 6.5 3155
7.5 3090
Cuda 7.5 deficit is still about 70k, about 2%.
see - that is very weird ...
if you have a spare system - try fedora install with the same setting you are using with centos ...
im baffled ...
i know this much for sure - if i go back to a f20x64c6.5 system - it compiles and runs beautifully with no issues in compile ...
the moment you go to f2x64c7.0 ( as you are forced to go to that version of cuda if you are using fedora 21 ) then hashrates are less than half that of c6.5 IF they work at all ...
the update to f22x64c7.5 seems to be running as well and better than the f20x64c6.5 installation ...
admittedly - its impossible for me to test f20x64c6.5 now as i dont have a spare machine to do the installation with - so there is no way of telling whether ccminer-spmod74 is actually running any better on f22x64c7.5 ...
im stumped mate ... really ... you helped me a while back with a compilation issue ( if you remember ) that i had with the earlier version f19x64c6.5 and i have been very thankful since ... the idea that an upgrade like this can do the reverse of what most people are getting NEEDS to have the source of it located ...
im actually quite upset that nvidia are leaving a lot of loose ends with their cuda implementations - unless off course you have the really high end cards ... it seems thats all they really care about at the moment ...
in any case - i appreciate your time and effort ( once again with my issue ) ...
#crysx