anyway - as for the overclocking side ... i think i will take wolfs advice and take another look into it next week week ... the next 3days for me is incredibly busy ...
Linux vs Windows, cuda 6.5 vs 7.5, x86 vs x86_64. Holy crap hasn't this been hashed and rehashed over and over again?
From my experience mining on Windows or Linux produces the same hash rates everything else being equal. However,
I have noticed that Windows hashing slows more due to other activity, in particular logging in remotely with ssh.
I haven't tried cuda 7.5 on either OS but the hashrates you reported on cuda 7.5 is significantly slower that I get with 6.5
on Linux or Windows. I conclude 7.5 is equally slow on both OS's.
32 vs 64 bit is not about the OS but about how ccminer is compiled. Compiling for 32 bit tends to be a little more efficient
when dealing with mostly 32 bit arithmetic.
Overclocking on Linux has been discussed at length in this thread, including getting it to work headless. Search for
"cooolbits" for everything you need to know.
id like to say that i totally agree with you joblo - but i dont ... as the systems i have running are showing the complete opposite of what you are stating ...
coolbits and oc are NOT working as they should on the gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards i have running ... investigation into this lead me to conclude that ( and i did read this on the nvidia site ) that the support is not currently implemented in the drivers ( cuda and video drivers ) as of yet - and is only available for the higher end cards ...
the cuda 7.5 implementation i have compiling ccminer-spmod IS causing hashing as fast ( and slightly faster ) than cuda 6.5 compiles ...
im not trying to be obnoxious - its a fact ...
sp has these results of slower hashrate using c7.5 as you do - i dont ...
go figure ...
#crysx
I know coolbits doesn't work. Flash your GPUs.
I'm not willing to go as far as flashing FW but coolbits worked for me.
Crysx, I don't think you are being obnoxious, just maybe a little stubborn. Your results are counter to others in
two ways that are contradictory. First you say Cuda 7.5 is faster than 6.5, while it's the reverse for everyone else.
But then your 7.5 hash rate (2800) is lower than others' 6.5 hash rate (3100). Putting both of those facts together
and your 6.5 hash rate would be even lower than 2800.
In order to accept your facts I would have to believe three things:
1. your particular 750ti's can't perform to the same level as any others,
2. for some unique reason you don't suffer the 10% loss in performance between 6.5 and 7.5 that anyone else experiences,
3. it's just a coincidence that your hash rates are lower by the same amount of degradation expected between 6.5 and 7.5.
If it was happening to me and potentially costing me 300 KH per card I'd want to get to the bottom of it.