Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 880. (Read 2347659 times)
Need to hit 150 blocks a day to make a profit.
Hashrate for bastion - i7 [email protected] 80kH...
I have sendt version 3 of the pentablake miner to the donators.
Happy hashing
Happy hashing
Im going to give it a try.....where did you get the difficulties ?
From the blockchain..
Whirlcoin is similar but more complex than whirlpoolx. More interations, more tweaking needed.
I optimised it for AMD and it now runs at 5x the public one.
Maybe, if there is interest, I can have a look at the cuda implementation.
I optimised it for AMD and it now runs at 5x the public one.
Maybe, if there is interest, I can have a look at the cuda implementation.
That would be nice. I will donate 0.1BTC in support if you make any progress. Please take a look at Whirlpool in x15 as well.
Whirlcoin is similar but more complex than whirlpoolx. More interations, more tweaking needed.
I optimised it for AMD and it now runs at 5x the public one.
Maybe, if there is interest, I can have a look at the cuda implementation.
I optimised it for AMD and it now runs at 5x the public one.
Maybe, if there is interest, I can have a look at the cuda implementation.
Im going to give it a try.....where did you get the difficulties ?
From the blockchain..
I have one by kbomba.........but needs adjustments.
Should integrate into miner control, and release a NVIDIA joincoin miner (profit switcher). (always mine the most profitable algo)
Sp is whirlpool and whirlpoolX the same algo?
Whirlpoolx is almost the same algo, so I think I can optimize it to be faster than today. But the algo name in ccminer is
-a whirl
(included in release 71)
I have one by kbomba.........but needs adjustments.
Should integrate into miner control, and release a NVIDIA joincoin miner (profit switcher). (always mine the most profitable algo)
Sp is whirlpool and whirlpoolX the same algo?
Whirlpoolx is almost the same algo, so I think I can optimize it to be faster than today. But the algo name in ccminer is
-a whirl
(included in release 71)
I've got the 8th donation now, so I will send out Pentablake miner version 3 with a few extra MHASH'es for the compute 5.2 cards. To all the pentablake donators.
its old whirlpool. so
-a whirl
Bastion is the most profitable now.. I might make a kernal just for fun
-a whirl
Bastion is the most profitable now.. I might make a kernal just for fun
tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal 5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I
will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit.
I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu.
Is it ccminer.exe -a pentablake -d 0 - benchmark
run with -a penta
Here are the current difficulties for joincoin.
Sha256 953402
keccak 492
penta 281.3
luffa 237.5
nist5 137
whirlpool 34.8
quark 26,7
x13 18.38
x15 8.8
Bastion 1.3
+ some others (scrypt? )
We should make profit calculator.. So hard to follow.
Sp is whirlpool and whirlpoolX the same algo?
tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal 5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I
will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit.
I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu.
Is it ccminer.exe -a pentablake -d 0 - benchmark
run with -a penta
Here are the current difficulties for joincoin.
Sha256 953402
keccak 492
penta 281.3
luffa 237.5
nist5 137
whirlpool 34.8
quark 26,7
x13 18.38
x15 8.8
Bastion 1.3
+ some others (scrypt? )
We should make profit calculator.. So hard to follow.
tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal 5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I
will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit.
I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu.
Is it ccminer.exe -a pentablake -d 0 - benchmark
With the current diff at around 100 Penta is highly profitable, but only with my fast private kernal and few miners.
run with -a penta
Penta's diff is usually higher. Keccak, Luffa, Whirl and probably even Quark is more profitable than Penta for a while now (on 750 Ti rigs).
profits:
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
Now the diff is at 231.30 and the profit is not the same anymore...
But here is r71 vs r72 quark
R71
R72 Quark
You have to let it run more than 17 accepts.
Yes sorry. New one. And I updated the other pics.
tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal 5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I
will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit.
I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu.
Is it ccminer.exe -a pentablake -d 0 - benchmark
With the current diff at around 100 Penta is highly profitable, but only with my fast private kernal and few miners.
run with -a penta
Penta's diff is usually higher. Keccak, Luffa, Whirl and probably even Quark is more profitable than Penta for a while now (on 750 Ti rigs).
profits:
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
Now the diff is at 231.30 and the profit is not the same anymore...
But here is r71 vs r72 quark
R71
R72 Quark
You have to let it run more than 17 accepts.
profits:
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
Now the diff is at 231.30 and the profit is not the same anymore...
But here is r71 vs r72 quark
R71
R72 Quark
profits:
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
Now the diff is at 231.30 and the profit is not the same anymore...
With my optimized code, the junior gtx 970 with 1600 shaders will outperform the gtx 980ti. I can push it up to 90MHASH with heavy overclocking, but 85 is more stable. I haven't tested the latest kernal on the 980ti yet, I but would love to see it running. The pentablake sp-mod 3 is unreleased..
Your Average hashrate in the benchmarkmode is around 60MHASH, so I believe the private miner will do around 120 or more on your card. Hopefully 140MHASH with spmod release 3
Then if implemented the 980ti should do 160 mh 2816 cuda cores Your Average hashrate in the benchmarkmode is around 60MHASH, so I believe the private miner will do around 120 or more on your card. Hopefully 140MHASH with spmod release 3
Jump to: