Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 916. (Read 2347659 times)

hi all ...

big update ... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12579292 ...

#crysx

If you look at the numbers in sp-mod 45, you see that many of the algorithms are much faster in release 69.
All the work I have done for small donations makes it faster.
But the miner community get spoiled because I release a new version every week. (To Djm34: 50khash * 20 = 1MHASH   )


Pentablake has been pretty much untuched since the beginning of my mod (1 year ago) So It was easy to make it 85% faster.
I have sold 4 copies now, the 5th will cost 0.3BTC (donation to my BTC adress)

Support the developers, and get a carrot back.

Who knows... it doesn't happen to me. Maybe nvidia driver crashing?
You can use a loop in the batch file as a workaround.

bensam, if "private miner" is not published, than it is not violating open source license. As soon it is published in any way, than source code should be published as well. Nobody is breaking rules here sending closed binaries over private channels. BTW, I'm also for optimized miner with fee, but devs already declared it's too much hassle doing it from scratch.

GTX970 run SP1.5.69 Quark, about 2-3 hours to exit the software I tried all versions are automatically exit 2-3 hours, which is why? Can someone help me please, WIN7 64 Thank you.

Nope, but at one point you made it seem like that was a non-argument as long as you have money before. I'm sorry for mistaking you folks for businessmen.


Oh yeah? The whole thing stopping this is a license agreement the majority of developers don't even respect as they take the code from open source miners and use it in their private ones anyway? We wouldn't want to violat the 'spirit' of open source now, especially when you're including the majority of developers that actually wrote the work. ~_~

Yeah, just looking for catchalls now.

I'm not always bashing miner developers. What do you think it means when I say I want to give you money? You say 'give us money', I say 'take my money', you say 'you no give us money', I say 'I'll give you money this way because it works for everyone and me', you reiterate 'why you a freeloader'... Apparently asking people to take your money in a different way makes you a bad person. Who knew when it's exactly what you were asking for. There is no 'trust' with a miner fee either as it's built into the program and everyone uses it.

I mentioned I'm sore because I lost a fuckton of money due to AMD developers not listing their private miners, selling them behind the scenes, only selling to certain individuals with a lot of money, AND not selling to people because they just don't like them (regardless of having money)... That actually happened, not just to me, but a lot of people. Those are allll reasons to use a miner fee. If you don't like who you are, change it. At no point did I actually call anyone a smelly ape or hurl insults (unlike people on the other side of this argument).

yes. release 69 is 70% faster than release 45 (blakecoin)

Pentablake... And blake is too?

Pentablake

80MHASH gtx 970 (OC)
30MHASH gtx 750ti (OC)

Limited edition sale



with my modded kernal your gtx 970 will be much faster than the Titanx!:

from the cryptominingblog: (penta (ccMiner 1.5.45 SP-MOD) )

Which algo?

edit..

private kernal for sale.

50% faster on the gtx 750ti
85% faster on the gtx 970.

PM for info

In central EU you would be paying with EUR and in some EU countries the solar energy is sold at .14c/kWh. Oddly enough I was fairly ok with your argumentation specifically. I still suspect you should get in touch with real world when it comes to this but at least I admit you have given an elaborated answer!

Mining on NiceHash can sometimes give you a bit more of the speed due to virtual shares being paid to you. These shares happen when our customers are using flood-a-like pools, that flood miners with extra jobs that require your miner to switch jobs constantly. If you have good enough bottom hardware (fast CPU), your mining is not so much affected, but you gain some extra speed that is not actual mining.

well, if you want to pay to make me insert that kind of logic, that would already be more interesting...   but as Pallas said, if we want to do it the right way (meaning not violating every licence terms around, then there is a lot more to do... and again most of us are more interested in kernel dev than in playing with that part of ccminer).

Now again, as said Wolf0, I don't feel obligated to sell to anyone... that's why I don't advertise (PR is clearly not my strong suit but so far it hasn't been a problem)
Also it is a question of respect and trust, you are always bashing miner devs, which shows very little respect to us, how could we trust you to not resell or even distribute for free what we would sell you privately ?
It has nothing to do with liking you or not, it is just common sense. From my point of view the risk
I would take by dealing with you, looks to me a bit too high...

  yeah... I missed that part of the fun for more than a year
two more, and I can make a coin  

Looks like you're having real fun with your troll account :-D
Now back to topic ;-)

yup... otherwise we take the risk of being trolled to death (that's why I usually troll first  )

To be perfectly honest dude, no one is going to take someone else to court over the licenses in our small little mining world. As I mentioned before, a fee could be split between the developers as they see fit. A fee schedule could even be made for it that is fair based on contributions - initial work, speed improvements, features, and bug fixes. Right there we have some initial categories. We already have people in the community who are good at some part of the above.

As far as removing the miner fee. Claymores miner worked fine with the fee. Even if someone removed it, there are tons of people who still used his program and CCminer would be no different. Just because there is a option to be evil or unlawful doesn't mean everyone chooses that option. Right now there isn't even the OPTION to mine with a fee... That's like quitting before even trying.

Continued support of the miner means continued income from the fee as well. It's the perfect system for payment. It's the whole reason pools don't require membership and instead use a fee. It's a much more powerful and robust method of compensation for the system we live in.


And yes, again and again. I am a little vexed because you have DJM that comes through and acts like everyone here who doesn't purchase his private miner or donated to him is a freeloader (even though I've purchased miners from other people and donated). Then everyone threatens to close up shop and move to private miners. You as a miner should respect the idea of a compensation. I mean that was his entire argument; yet for some reason we can't get over this hurdle of a large lump some is the only way to pay people.

Donations will never be enough because people expect them now, that's not what donations are for and why it wont work to fulfill this problem.

again and again...

developers of amd miners, many months ago, went to sell private miners because nobody was supporting their work.
some is supporting now, but it's still a drop in the ocean.
if you make a program and you can get 0.05 BTC or 5 BTC, what you'd choose?

miner with fee: if you opensource it, someone will remove the fee and everybody will use his version. it has happened with non-opensource miners as well.

Claymore: he is either using opensource software (which is breaking the license) or he's got a lot lot lot of time to redevelop the stratum client, the nonce generation, the gpu interface, etc. etc. I for sure do not want to break any license nor have enough time to do all the miner from scratch.

You don't feed me dude. That's what the money is for. That's why I keep saying to add a dev fee. It goes the opposite direction. Or is the whole reason you guys are so afraid of a equal sharing crowd funding program because you then wouldn't be able to pretend you're somehow helping people by making private miners and distributing them to the top 3% of miners who can afford them?

Here Ill put it in bold because your eyes always seem to gloss over when I mentioned it: MINER FEE.

Do I need to commission someone to add a optional miner fee to CCminer? Literally paying someone to have you guys take my money? (Funny this almost sounds the complete opposite of what you were arguing) I can't afford to buy a 5-6 BTC miner as I'm a small miner especially after my initial investment with AMD was lost due to the aforementioned bullshit that was traded under the tables, but if you use a fee, we all chip in and make it work. It's proportional and you'll make a hell of a lot more then trading to a handful of people that make more money then you'll ever see.

Here lets add a bit more, has anyone asked Claymore how well he did with his Cryptonote miner? A shining example of how well this works.

You don't even advertise your private miners or their cost. I've purchased every private miner I've heard of that was lucrative so far and I could afford. You wont even give me a offer because you don't like me. Just shows how corrupt and fucked up your logic is.