The bonus went to:
- Darker45
- The Cryptovator
- GeorgeJohn
- m2017
- LogitechMouse
Thank you, everyone!
Topic: [CFNP] BestChange Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ - page 19. (Read 130653 times)
Payment for week 186 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/60a8b03012e2279e08b7e86c4c4d8225681893168906290d1e8a8aa7ff60b16a
The bonus went to:
Thank you, everyone!
The bonus went to:
Thank you, everyone!
Payment for week 185 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/970bdd4cea52f36adf9be193c5c704262e5d4b0abf8db27f188271a81238a191
Bonus went to:
Cheers!
Bonus went to:
- cryptoaddictchie
- hugeblack
- lovesmayfamilis
- zasad@
- Mpamaegbu
Cheers!
Payment for week 184 was sent yesterday: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/5493d057ab7d749e4a23d80c0659129363b6314ea71ea925c74f7ce2d2712561
Bonus went to:
Thank you, guys!
Bonus went to:
- GreatArkansas
- Mpamaegbu
- GeorgeJohn
- Adbitco
- Husires
Thank you, guys!
Thank you for your question, m2017. It has been replied to by other campaign participants, and we would just reiterate their message.
Even after Best_Change himself addressed this matter some folks are still stretching it. To what end if I may ask. I now perceive hypocrisy.
Our manager here is a very friendly one like @The Cryptovator said.
He is lucky Best_change is not a harsh manager. One uncounted post is not what anyone should fight over. Those in this campaign are lucky to have this type of kind manager. Some other managers would have seen it as an insult to their authority and removed him from the campaign quickly for making trouble with that post. He should have sent the post as a pm and complained inbox and the whole thing settled easily in private. Good everything is finally settled.
~snip
I'm glad you're back and with us again.Thank you Best_Change manager for not leaving my post without attention. Now I have received the answer to my question and in the future, I will take this into account.
Thanks to everyone who didn't remain indifferent in solving one of my useless questions. It always pleases how selflessly forum members are ready to answer them and generously share their wisdom. I appreciate it and will take note of the advice given to me. I sincerely thank you.
By the way, I'm a little bit stupid and therefore, I don't understand the hints from the forum members with paid signatures on their accounts.
In our area, a phrase from one anecdote is popular: you either take off your cross, or put on your underpants. 
Its just a merely 1 post, I dont think that would hurt you. Like others said, you could contribute to forum without even looking at your weekly post count.
I don't even see it as something too bad for one not to let go, sometimes I myself may think my post are completed but during payment I may not get complete payment, and that just happened either ones or twice. What just happened is that we should take posting as something we are using to contribute to the forum and post without attaching any feelings of pay back. I know that yes we are spending our time to read and create constructive post but that shouldn't weigh us down due to the value we achieve at the end, to be at the safer sides and to avoid this dream next why not they creates above the required number of post per week than just giving an exact number because sometimes your post might got deleted by modes which I know managers do not counts those posts since is deleted. This hasn't come to my attention yet till I was mentioned here.
In my opinion, the situation is a little controversial and I think that it is quite rare. But in the future, this may happen again, and therefore, it would be good to understand this precedent, which will allow us not to return to the search for a solution again. So to speak, to approve specific rules on this issue.
I believe thats not an issue mate. You have said that you are longer than 1 year but more of us here are stayed longer than you and as far as I can remember, theres none who complain about a post is not counted. Its just a merely 1 post, I dont think that would hurt you. Like others said, you could contribute to forum without even looking at your weekly post count. I myself didnt bother sometimes I even make more 40 post its because I am sometimes engage with topics that really interesting for me. You are good poster share your thoughts without thinking of the paychecks of this campaign.Indeed you received the bonus this week means you are quality poster. You should be grateful with that instead. Our manager here is a very friendly one like @The Cryptovator said.
Payment for week 183 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/b9cd01ff24ad0aa1528ea574121ec6db8eeaa7f5d0412db24a57c02a161ddabf
The bonus went to:
Thank you for your question, m2017. It has been replied to by other campaign participants, and we would just reiterate their message.
It can so happen that moderators remove the post or move it to another section, which section may or may not be paid for by our campaign. If you aim to receive the max payout for the week, it may be a good idea, as others have said, to write more than the weekly maximum, i.e. over 25 posts, just to be on the safe side.
Cheers!
The bonus went to:
- hugeblack
- adaseb
- zasad@
- m2017
- Adbitco
~snip~
Thank you for your question, m2017. It has been replied to by other campaign participants, and we would just reiterate their message.
It can so happen that moderators remove the post or move it to another section, which section may or may not be paid for by our campaign. If you aim to receive the max payout for the week, it may be a good idea, as others have said, to write more than the weekly maximum, i.e. over 25 posts, just to be on the safe side.
Cheers!
I have a question for the manager, who will hopefully answer it when he returns.
Here goes!
When someone posts for the sole purpose of meeting their weekly post quota, it's not uncommon for questions like this to arise. If you have a complaint about the post count, you can ask the manager through a personal message, there is no point in creating a bad impression by posting this question here. The manager did nothing wrong here, your post was off topic when it counted. So it was totally your mistake. Change your posting habits to meet the weekly maximum post quota, then from next week you won't need to blame the manager again asking why my post isn't counted.Here goes!
Thanks to @The Cryptovator for taking the time to take on the role of deputy manager of the Bestchange signature campaign during the vacation period, which allowed participants to receive their rewards for the past week in a timely manner.
I have a question for the manager, who will hopefully answer it when he returns.
Here goes!
For all the time that I have been a member of the Bestchange signature campaign, which, by the way, has been for more than a year, I have consistently fulfilled the weekly maximum in terms of the number of posts. With a few exceptions, of course. This is easily verified from the data in spreadsheet. Why am I saying this? Yesterday, for the first time, I encountered the fact that 1 of my posts was not counted, and this surprised me. Therefore, I checked all the posts from the past week and found that one topic had been moved to the off-topic section. Although I remember exactly that that topic was in bitcoin discussion section. I want to note that I almost never conduct a discussion in the off-topic section, and even by mistake I could not write there. I assume that the moderators moved that topic from bitcoin discussion section to the off-topic section.
In connection with the foregoing, I am voicing the question that I mentioned at the beginning: is it right not to count a post that was written as part of the rules of the signature campaign, but due to the decision and actions of the forum administration, which brought the post beyond the campaign conditions? I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the forum participant himself could not influence this in any way and initially acted within the framework of the campaign conditions.
In my opinion, the situation is a little controversial and I think that it is quite rare. But in the future, this may happen again, and therefore, it would be good to understand this precedent, which will allow us not to return to the search for a solution again. So to speak, to approve specific rules on this issue.
Thank you for your attention.
That topic - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62520043
My post - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62520956
I have a question for the manager, who will hopefully answer it when he returns.
Here goes!
For all the time that I have been a member of the Bestchange signature campaign, which, by the way, has been for more than a year, I have consistently fulfilled the weekly maximum in terms of the number of posts. With a few exceptions, of course. This is easily verified from the data in spreadsheet. Why am I saying this? Yesterday, for the first time, I encountered the fact that 1 of my posts was not counted, and this surprised me. Therefore, I checked all the posts from the past week and found that one topic had been moved to the off-topic section. Although I remember exactly that that topic was in bitcoin discussion section. I want to note that I almost never conduct a discussion in the off-topic section, and even by mistake I could not write there. I assume that the moderators moved that topic from bitcoin discussion section to the off-topic section.
In connection with the foregoing, I am voicing the question that I mentioned at the beginning: is it right not to count a post that was written as part of the rules of the signature campaign, but due to the decision and actions of the forum administration, which brought the post beyond the campaign conditions? I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the forum participant himself could not influence this in any way and initially acted within the framework of the campaign conditions.
In my opinion, the situation is a little controversial and I think that it is quite rare. But in the future, this may happen again, and therefore, it would be good to understand this precedent, which will allow us not to return to the search for a solution again. So to speak, to approve specific rules on this issue.
Thank you for your attention.
That topic - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62520043
My post - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62520956
Your posts should be in the appropriate section during the post count, according to the campaign rules. There should be no controversy. If your post doesn't exist in the appropriate sections for a week, you don't deserve payment for it anyway. It's useless to raise a question in such a case.
I have a question: Why do you always make 25 posts? Is it just to meet the weekly quota? Isn't that a dumb idea? It indicates that you only make posts to get paid and don't have any real interest in contributing to the forum. Why can't you make more or fewer posts? The minimum requirement to be eligible for the campaign is 10 posts, so you are free to post more than that. There's no need to limit yourself to 25. If the manager is too strict, they might remove participants who haven't been contributing to the forum. However, the Bestchange manager is friendly enough towards participants.
Please refrain from raising useless questions.
In connection with the foregoing, I am voicing the question that I mentioned at the beginning: is it right not to count a post that was written as part of the rules of the signature campaign, but due to the decision and actions of the forum administration, which brought the post beyond the campaign conditions? I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the forum participant himself could not influence this in any way and initially acted within the framework of the campaign conditions.
How would the manager know if a post was moved or originally was made in off-topic? Manually check every post? That would be very time-consuming. The only way to make it efficient is through automation, but that means the development of a custom script.
But also, at the core I think it's the responsibility of participants to not post in low-quality topics if they don't want their posts moved together with the topic.
m2017 "experience is the best teacher", it is not only you that have experienced such incident. So next time as others have said, make sure you check your posts a day to the deadline for payment or the very day of the payment but before the time elapsed so that if there is any deletion, or movement of posts to off topic then you can quickly complete the number again. And as Charles-Tim said, always post more than the required number so that you will not have this kind of issue again. Or to avoid that, you personally count your post before the pay day.
There are some posts we think is good or has quality but for other people, we are talking out of point from the topic so they would report the post to be deleted or moved to the appropriate board.
Therefore, from what you said, the management only counted the posts in their accepted boards. So the mistake is not from them. Thanks for your understanding.
There are some posts we think is good or has quality but for other people, we are talking out of point from the topic so they would report the post to be deleted or moved to the appropriate board.
Therefore, from what you said, the management only counted the posts in their accepted boards. So the mistake is not from them. Thanks for your understanding.
If I may;
It's rather common to have such events occur on the forum and I don't know if its your first to have necessitate the out burst. Don't know how many of your posts that got moved but, I feel it's something you can sock it up easily in a campaign that pays per post.
If it were to be in a campaign that priorities on post quota, you might have as well lost all payment for the week and that would be a lesson not to make 25 in exact.
Campaigns are about exposure and the campaign has designated certain boards to be where they are most likely to get patronage from and it doesn't just span through the week but the entire time the post would continue to exists on the forum and board of interest.
Hence, not having your post on boards of interest especially within the week in which the counting is been done already sets the project at a disadvantage. Its not your fault that a post got moved but, it places you at a position to evaluate as well the possibility of posts your commenting in not to have been in its right place to either report or prepare for the inevitable whenever it happens.
That's my the on this.
It's rather common to have such events occur on the forum and I don't know if its your first to have necessitate the out burst. Don't know how many of your posts that got moved but, I feel it's something you can sock it up easily in a campaign that pays per post.
If it were to be in a campaign that priorities on post quota, you might have as well lost all payment for the week and that would be a lesson not to make 25 in exact.
Campaigns are about exposure and the campaign has designated certain boards to be where they are most likely to get patronage from and it doesn't just span through the week but the entire time the post would continue to exists on the forum and board of interest.
Hence, not having your post on boards of interest especially within the week in which the counting is been done already sets the project at a disadvantage. Its not your fault that a post got moved but, it places you at a position to evaluate as well the possibility of posts your commenting in not to have been in its right place to either report or prepare for the inevitable whenever it happens.
That's my the on this.
In my opinion, the situation is a little controversial and I think that it is quite rare. But in the future, this may happen again, and therefore, it would be good to understand this precedent, which will allow us not to return to the search for a solution again. So to speak, to approve specific rules on this issue.
Not at all. The situation is the most common, and you are indignant in vain. I can say that I often send reports to moderators and requests to move the topic to the appropriate section. And quite often, topics have an off-topic place, which is where they go if someone reports them.
What's wrong with checking your posts? And also, what's the problem with writing a little more? When such conversations arise, many get the impression that some are here for only one purpose. I think you understand what I'm talking about.
A Russian proverb says that sometimes words are worth their weight in gold, but let them be here on the forum for communication.
In my opinion, the situation is a little controversial and I think that it is quite rare. But in the future, this may happen again, and therefore, it would be good to understand this precedent, which will allow us not to return to the search for a solution again. So to speak, to approve specific rules on this issue.
There is no precedent here, this rule always applies in all campaigns. If there are predetermined places on the forum where posts are not counted, it doesn't matter if the post was moved or the poster wrote in the "irrelevant" section. It's the same with deleted posts, and there can be various reasons for that. The owner of the campaign set such rules and it means nothing to him if the post was in the white zone for campaign counting for one day.
As Charles-Tim said, don't stay at exactly 25 posts and you won't have this problem.
@m2017
Bestchange requires 25 posts every week but you posted only 25. You should be expecting that one or two of the posts can be moved to off-topic. No matter how good you are to avoid off-topic posts, some topics that you have replies can be moved to off-topic board. To avoid this, make more than 25 posts every week.
I remember when I was in Bestchange and the present campaign that I am now, I hardly even check the spreadsheet, but I am paid fully because I post more than required. I am not comparing myself to you, but just pointing out the reason I am always fully paid.
Another thing you can do is to check your weekly posts a day and some hours to weekly post end. If you see some or two posts moved to off-topic, you can be able to complete the weekly posts. But I do not like the idea of making exactly the same posts required by campaign manager.
Else, if nothing is done by you, expect this to happen again. The rules are easy to follow.
Bestchange requires 25 posts every week but you posted only 25. You should be expecting that one or two of the posts can be moved to off-topic. No matter how good you are to avoid off-topic posts, some topics that you have replies can be moved to off-topic board. To avoid this, make more than 25 posts every week.
I remember when I was in Bestchange and the present campaign that I am now, I hardly even check the spreadsheet, but I am paid fully because I post more than required. I am not comparing myself to you, but just pointing out the reason I am always fully paid.
Another thing you can do is to check your weekly posts a day and some hours to weekly post end. If you see some or two posts moved to off-topic, you can be able to complete the weekly posts. But I do not like the idea of making exactly the same posts required by campaign manager.
Else, if nothing is done by you, expect this to happen again. The rules are easy to follow.
Thanks to @The Cryptovator for taking the time to take on the role of deputy manager of the Bestchange signature campaign during the vacation period, which allowed participants to receive their rewards for the past week in a timely manner.
I have a question for the manager, who will hopefully answer it when he returns.
Here goes!
For all the time that I have been a member of the Bestchange signature campaign, which, by the way, has been for more than a year, I have consistently fulfilled the weekly maximum in terms of the number of posts. With a few exceptions, of course. This is easily verified from the data in spreadsheet. Why am I saying this? Yesterday, for the first time, I encountered the fact that 1 of my posts was not counted, and this surprised me. Therefore, I checked all the posts from the past week and found that one topic had been moved to the off-topic section. Although I remember exactly that that topic was in bitcoin discussion section. I want to note that I almost never conduct a discussion in the off-topic section, and even by mistake I could not write there. I assume that the moderators moved that topic from bitcoin discussion section to the off-topic section.
In connection with the foregoing, I am voicing the question that I mentioned at the beginning: is it right not to count a post that was written as part of the rules of the signature campaign, but due to the decision and actions of the forum administration, which brought the post beyond the campaign conditions? I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the forum participant himself could not influence this in any way and initially acted within the framework of the campaign conditions.
In my opinion, the situation is a little controversial and I think that it is quite rare. But in the future, this may happen again, and therefore, it would be good to understand this precedent, which will allow us not to return to the search for a solution again. So to speak, to approve specific rules on this issue.
Thank you for your attention.
That topic - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62520043
My post - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62520956
I have a question for the manager, who will hopefully answer it when he returns.
Here goes!
For all the time that I have been a member of the Bestchange signature campaign, which, by the way, has been for more than a year, I have consistently fulfilled the weekly maximum in terms of the number of posts. With a few exceptions, of course. This is easily verified from the data in spreadsheet. Why am I saying this? Yesterday, for the first time, I encountered the fact that 1 of my posts was not counted, and this surprised me. Therefore, I checked all the posts from the past week and found that one topic had been moved to the off-topic section. Although I remember exactly that that topic was in bitcoin discussion section. I want to note that I almost never conduct a discussion in the off-topic section, and even by mistake I could not write there. I assume that the moderators moved that topic from bitcoin discussion section to the off-topic section.
In connection with the foregoing, I am voicing the question that I mentioned at the beginning: is it right not to count a post that was written as part of the rules of the signature campaign, but due to the decision and actions of the forum administration, which brought the post beyond the campaign conditions? I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the forum participant himself could not influence this in any way and initially acted within the framework of the campaign conditions.
In my opinion, the situation is a little controversial and I think that it is quite rare. But in the future, this may happen again, and therefore, it would be good to understand this precedent, which will allow us not to return to the search for a solution again. So to speak, to approve specific rules on this issue.
Thank you for your attention.
That topic - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62520043
My post - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62520956
Payment has been made for week 182: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/2968cc012be54c98f1893e26990e024d192aa2a9b849d9e11f54611a20c67354
As it's customary and for those wondering why the weekly bonus part was not mentioned, the bonus for Week 182 according to the spreadsheet went to:- The Cryptovator
- hugeblack
- lovesmayfamilis
- GeorgeJohn
- Xal0lex
Payment has been made for week 182: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/2968cc012be54c98f1893e26990e024d192aa2a9b849d9e11f54611a20c67354
Payment for week 181 has been sent:
P.S. For the next week, our campaign manager is going on vacation. For week 182, The Cryptovator will kindly count the posts.
Thanks for the opportunity, its my pleasure 🙏 P.S. For the next week, our campaign manager is going on vacation. For week 182, The Cryptovator will kindly count the posts.
Jump to: