I just noticed that the payment for week 173 has been sent since May 10th, but unfortunately it hasn't been confirmed even though it was broadcast 4 days ago.
~snip
I just noticed that the transaction has already been confirmed. After only 5 days, and no one even left from Best_Change signature campaign without waiting for it.
All participants can breathe a sigh of relief.
I mean you should be patient.
Why? Because the manager decided to save on transactions and pay 12 sat at a time when the commission was 300-400 sat per 1 byte? Not a single forum campaign puts such commissions on payment to its participants, everyone is trying to find compromises.
The campaign is one of the best and longest on the forum, but the manager cannot afford to pay an extra 20-30 bucks for a transaction? This somehow does not fit with the status of an elite campaign, which is attributed to this campaign.
I see that participants from other campaigns are really worried about what is happening in this thread and are worried about our payouts. How nice, thank you .
In general, Ratimov's statements are very accurate and compromises would be the best solution.
BestChange signature campaign seems to be having a series of minor troubles lately, which I am sure will be eliminated and will not affect their future fate. The status of an elite campaign is impossible if don't keep at a certain high level.
I remember in the past that their wallet did not support bc1 while most wallets was supporting those addresses.
I think it will be appropriate at a time like this for BestChange to mandate its signature participants to have a wallet change to SegWit. I'm all for anything that will make this Blockchain nightmare go away.
Participants themselves should think about it after this week and it should not be difficult to change the address to bc1-format. 5 of the 25 participants didn't have any difficulty, right.
P.S. Best_Change manager, forgive us that we made a mix of a discussion with a delay in transaction confirmation (as well as related issues) and users applications for a place in the BestChange signature campaign. This created a bit of extra hassle for you.
It seems to me that most of the participants were sympathetic to what happened (Is it so?), but it was necessary to speak out. Otherwise, why do we need a forum, if not for discussion.