Thanks to @The Cryptovator for taking the time to take on the role of deputy manager of the Bestchange signature campaign during the vacation period, which allowed participants to receive their rewards for the past week in a timely manner.
I have a question for the manager, who will hopefully answer it when he returns.
Here goes!
For all the time that I have been a member of the Bestchange signature campaign, which, by the way, has been for more than a year, I have consistently fulfilled the weekly maximum in terms of the number of posts. With a few exceptions, of course. This is easily verified from the data in spreadsheet. Why am I saying this? Yesterday, for the first time, I encountered the fact that 1 of my posts was not counted, and this surprised me. Therefore, I checked all the posts from the past week and found that one topic had been moved to the
off-topic section. Although I remember exactly that that topic was in
bitcoin discussion section. I want to note that I almost never conduct a discussion in the
off-topic section, and even by mistake I could not write there. I assume that the moderators moved that topic from
bitcoin discussion section to the
off-topic section.
In connection with the foregoing, I am voicing the question that I mentioned at the beginning: is it right not to count a post that was written as part of the rules of the signature campaign, but due to the decision and actions of the forum administration, which brought the post beyond the campaign conditions? I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the forum participant himself could not influence this in any way and initially acted within the framework of the campaign conditions.
In my opinion, the situation is a little controversial and I think that it is quite rare. But in the future, this may happen again, and therefore, it would be good to understand this precedent, which will allow us not to return to the search for a solution again. So to speak, to approve specific rules on this issue.
Thank you for your attention.
That topic -
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62520043My post -
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62520956Your posts should be in the appropriate section during the post count, according to the campaign rules. There should be no controversy. If your post doesn't exist in the appropriate sections for a week, you don't deserve payment for it anyway. It's useless to raise a question in such a case.
I have a question: Why do you always make 25 posts? Is it just to meet the weekly quota? Isn't that a dumb idea? It indicates that you only make posts to get paid and don't have any real interest in contributing to the forum. Why can't you make more or fewer posts? The minimum requirement to be eligible for the campaign is 10 posts, so you are free to post more than that. There's no need to limit yourself to 25. If the manager is too strict, they might remove participants who haven't been contributing to the forum. However, the Bestchange manager is friendly enough towards participants.
Please refrain from raising useless questions.
In our area, a phrase from one anecdote is popular: you either take off your cross, or put on your underpants. 
