#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: Restmand
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/restmand-791590
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 918
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 3
BTC Address: 3CN6moBxz9vNXkirtDkMsMgNsrGV7NCp3Y
Topic: [CFNP] BestChange Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ - page 68. (Read 133492 times)
Hi everyone,
TXID: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/b87a83ee846200d6d207b1edfef91724de77edcbce8e8525be3ec8a26998f24b
This week the bonus goes to:
Cheers and take care!
TXID: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/b87a83ee846200d6d207b1edfef91724de77edcbce8e8525be3ec8a26998f24b
This week the bonus goes to:
- 20kevin20
- Coolcryptovator
- CryptopreneurBrainboss
- Upgrade00
- adaseb
Cheers and take care!
Just for you to know: CFNP, as you see in topic title, means "currently full for new participants".
#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: MagicByt3
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/dacryptoraccoon-2269783
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 977
BTC Address: 3JjsGHYQH8yVJA5G4mgPNHuoX4DHmU5fis
Hope to make the cut this time!
Bitcointalk Name: MagicByt3
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/dacryptoraccoon-2269783
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 977
BTC Address: 3JjsGHYQH8yVJA5G4mgPNHuoX4DHmU5fis
Hope to make the cut this time!
Quote
. Post made after page 5 we usually consider as a spam.
What does it mean? (I am writing about page number 5)?
You should make a post within 5 pages in a certain thread, beyond that it could be considered as spam, that was the rule added in the OP to reduce the spam of the campaign and I think they are still implementing it until now.
yes, but he doesn't have to worry about that. he is not in this campaign.
Quote
. Post made after page 5 we usually consider as a spam.
What does it mean? (I am writing about page number 5)?
You should make a post within 5 pages in a certain thread, beyond that it could be considered as spam, that was the rule added in the OP to reduce the spam of the campaign and I think they are still implementing it until now.
Quote
. Post made after page 5 we usually consider as a spam.
What does it mean? (I am writing about page number 5)?
Hi everyone,
TXID: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/8c01252f00a449a5c24df4e4df8a6a76a85e5154b357246682e2fa231aebd950
This week the bonus goes to:
Thanks for the counting posts, Coolcryptovator!
TXID: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/8c01252f00a449a5c24df4e4df8a6a76a85e5154b357246682e2fa231aebd950
This week the bonus goes to:
- Rikafip
- nutildah
- Royse777
- tranthidung
- adaseb
Thanks for the counting posts, Coolcryptovator!
Thanks for the payment. I saw the TXID and saw that bitcoin fee was over 230sats/byte and then I was like "holy, why use such a large fee" and then I checked the unconfirmed transaction browser and seems that there are over 140000 unconfirmed transactions. Seems like a repeat of late 2017 again.
Feel bad for you guys having to pay almost $40 in transaction fees alone. Thanks for the great service.
Hi everyone,
TXID: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/8c01252f00a449a5c24df4e4df8a6a76a85e5154b357246682e2fa231aebd950
This week the bonus goes to:
Thanks for the counting posts, Coolcryptovator!
TXID: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/8c01252f00a449a5c24df4e4df8a6a76a85e5154b357246682e2fa231aebd950
This week the bonus goes to:
- Rikafip
- nutildah
- Royse777
- tranthidung
- adaseb
Thanks for the counting posts, Coolcryptovator!
#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: NeuroticFish
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/neuroticfish-257071
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 8439
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 128
BTC Address: 3KpAg8N2xhv5JAHMeiu4GCr8pVWbYnBV8N
Bitcointalk Name: NeuroticFish
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/neuroticfish-257071
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 8439
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 128
BTC Address: 3KpAg8N2xhv5JAHMeiu4GCr8pVWbYnBV8N
Accepted. When you change your signature and avatar, please PM me. Thanks.
#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: Twentyonepaylots
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/twentyonepaylots-1075222
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 1889
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 23
BTC Address: bc1qme0j0hxrxyghzgxfrdd7sat5eehuyatugak2th
Bitcointalk Name: Twentyonepaylots
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/twentyonepaylots-1075222
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 1889
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 23
BTC Address: bc1qme0j0hxrxyghzgxfrdd7sat5eehuyatugak2th
#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: Bagiira
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bagiira-1273026
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 288
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 128
BTC Address: 1CcpcCLDyo66Qmjj7VfquVfBDdQASpxU6W
Bitcointalk Name: Bagiira
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bagiira-1273026
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 288
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 128
BTC Address: 1CcpcCLDyo66Qmjj7VfquVfBDdQASpxU6W
_snip_
When you say "can accept no more", you mean that you will simply not count such posts, or do you mean you will punish the participant ?
I have no intention of spamming, however I participate in some long running threads, would posts made in these be excluded from being counted (like posts in local, etc.) or would they be seen as a bad thing to avoid ?
When you say "can accept no more", you mean that you will simply not count such posts, or do you mean you will punish the participant ?
I have no intention of spamming, however I participate in some long running threads, would posts made in these be excluded from being counted (like posts in local, etc.) or would they be seen as a bad thing to avoid ?
This issue has been discussed before, please start following from this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55161311
maybe you will find the answer.
When you say "can accept no more", you mean that you will simply not count such posts, or do you mean you will punish the participant ?
In my opinion, it means the manager would accept no more than 10% of posts in those boards for the weekly quota, I doubt there would be any other punishment as long as the user meets the minimum post number for the week in boards/threads that counts (10 posts). 
Hello again.
#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: Timelord2067
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131361
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 6,480
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 70 https://loyce.club/120days/index.html#611
BTC Address: 34nS7nYZKB2KvkVfWsAsJFWvCpexZ4zj69
Code:
#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: Timelord2067
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131361
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 6,480
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 70 https://loyce.club/120days/index.html#611
BTC Address: 34nS7nYZKB2KvkVfWsAsJFWvCpexZ4zj69
#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: aesma
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/aesma-216310
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 1698
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 67
BTC Address: 39v7Mcr9ZY1TtFL35mcimZQgRSFovzA4Sf
I will wear signature and avatar if accepted.
I'd like some clarification on this rule :
When you say "can accept no more", you mean that you will simply not count such posts, or do you mean you will punish the participant ?
I have no intention of spamming, however I participate in some long running threads, would posts made in these be excluded from being counted (like posts in local, etc.) or would they be seen as a bad thing to avoid ?
Thanks
Bitcointalk Name: aesma
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/aesma-216310
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 1698
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 67
BTC Address: 39v7Mcr9ZY1TtFL35mcimZQgRSFovzA4Sf
I will wear signature and avatar if accepted.
I'd like some clarification on this rule :
Quote
- Don't spam. Post made after page 5 we usually consider as a spam. We can accept no more than 10% posts of weekly post quota (for example 2-3 of 25), if posts are written after page 5.
When you say "can accept no more", you mean that you will simply not count such posts, or do you mean you will punish the participant ?
I have no intention of spamming, however I participate in some long running threads, would posts made in these be excluded from being counted (like posts in local, etc.) or would they be seen as a bad thing to avoid ?
Thanks
Guys, can we please avoid off-topic discussion on this thread that isn't related to the Best_Change Signature campaign? Only the application of participants and discussion about post count, avatar, signature, and payment issue discussion would be admirable.
The manager should report off-topic discussion to the moderators.
The manager should report off-topic discussion to the moderators.
It has all become a trendy form of derailing a thread from its motive and talking nonsense (though sensical) things which are considered off-topic. I think there must be a punishment for these derailing posts except the posts like those which give evidence about a user and their alt, or a negative received in their account and significantly, posts that are found to be plagiarized. It is not advisable to make any off-topic posts in signature campaign threads as it harms the reputation of the campaign and the users who make off-topic posts.
A popular campaign usually has a lot of people posting, for example, Chipmixer, when they announce an opening, the thread was full of discussion, so I think while OP should temporarily lock the thread while reviewing the applications.
Guys, can we please avoid off-topic discussion on this thread that isn't related to the Best_Change Signature campaign? Only the application of participants and discussion about post count, avatar, signature, and payment issue discussion would be admirable.
The manager should report off-topic discussion to the moderators.
The manager should report off-topic discussion to the moderators.
It has all become a trendy form of derailing a thread from its motive and talking nonsense (though sensical) things which are considered off-topic. I think there must be a punishment for these derailing posts except the posts like those which give evidence about a user and their alt, or a negative received in their account and significantly, posts that are found to be plagiarized and the user is of the same campaign where another user reports. It is not advisable to make any off-topic posts in signature campaign threads as it harms the reputation of the campaign and the users who make off-topic posts.
Guys, can we please avoid off-topic discussion on this thread that isn't related to the Best_Change Signature campaign? Only the application of participants and discussion about post count, avatar, signature, and payment issue discussion would be admirable.
The manager should report off-topic discussion to the moderators.
The manager should report off-topic discussion to the moderators.
Reapplying
#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: Daltonik
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/daltonik-215813
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 1884
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 115
BTC Address: 1LR6qvXonvcMKzeZttnSbLcLZBmsg3EaPx
#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: Daltonik
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/daltonik-215813
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 1884
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 115
BTC Address: 1LR6qvXonvcMKzeZttnSbLcLZBmsg3EaPx
Jump to: