Topic: [CFNP] BestChange Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ - page 72. (Read 133465 times)

Like others my initial reservations in the beginning of the year do not stand now because Best Change has established itself.

I have yet to apply for any campaign other than Chipmixer when I was overlooked and have refused various others when they contacted me via PM but with many established users joining this campaign I am tempted to apply the next time slots open.

Well done to Best Change for maintaining its presence in the forum for a long time without any or very little controversy. I hope that continues.

Unless, of course, the campaign is over by that time, or some of us are not excluded from here, which we would not want at all.  

Hi, Best_Change. Thank you for another great week. Today I received a new Hero member rank. May I apply for a new position in the spreadsheet?

Hi, Best_Change. Thank you for another great week. Today I received a new Hero member rank. May I apply for a new position in the spreadsheet?

Hi, Best_Change. Thank you for another great week. Today I received a new Hero member rank. May I apply for a new position in the spreadsheet?

Thank you very much for merit and for your advice! 
I have written to the Manager and hope for a little indulgence for me.

Thank you.


Yes, you don't even have to go far for an example, when I was accepted into this campaign, I asked the manager to give me one more day to wear another signature in order to close the week and get paid. The Manager gave the go-ahead  

Yes, that's right, I was promoted to Senior member on September 17 and I immediately applied for a bounty Signature. And in this list, BestChange Campaign in the status is open ..

She probably did not have enough activity to apply, at least that is my presumtion. See she has 241 activity and most likely she just got it and became Senior member. No that it excuses late entry, but I kinda understand why this could've happened, so it should be taken as a factor. I feel for her

The campaign was in OPEN status for a whole week, but you decided to apply exactly after the onset of CFNP status.

I admire the desire for adapting the signature campaign to the forum needs. Not many services tent do do it.
You made some good changes like keeping the minimum required posts to 10 and paying per post which just reduced the HQ spam which gives you a better reputation.

I don't want to be pushed to post just because I'm missing 4-5 post. Ideally the signature campaigns shouldn't change the posting behavior of the participants, but this of course is almost impossible as many users are here just for the $.
Anyway, you can make it a bit more flexible if you want. Like the participant can choose to wear avatar or not, many people prefer to keep their own avatars and have only signatures on for reduced reward of course.

Sometimes you see participants from the same campaign in a discussion and it's a wall of all the same avatars and signatures and for my opinion it doesn't look very attractive, but again this is just my opinion.

The content of the posts should be more important than the number of the posts. Of course, every service wants a better exposure but the practice have shown that those who hire posters just to reach the weekly quota are not taken very seriously. So you are heading towards the right decision.

The CM campaign has put the bar very high but it's a good example how a sig. campaign can be successful in a long run.

Good luck to your business.

Accepted:

#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: lovesmayfamilis
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lovesmayfamilis-1982152
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 1336
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 180
BTC Address: 1FgCDJf8fGUPfCw3PsbF3B7xYWPMpSns9M

Accepted: