ckpool.org CLOSED - page 111. | Bitcointalksearch.org

crypto_curious

full member

Activity: 933

Merit: 175

Quote from: BadgerHobbs on March 19, 2018, 10:46:38 AM

Quote from: SmurfBerry on March 19, 2018, 10:29:22 AM

I have approx 1PH. Would it be easy to configure my Avalon’s to point to this pool? I e tried to read through as much as possible, but it seems different than other pools I’ve used. (slush and NiceHash)

Mining on this pool is as easy as any other. Point your miners to pool.ckpool.org:3333, with your username as the wallet address you want to send your earned BTC too, and with password x.

Rewards will be larger but less often at this pool due to the lower hashrate. And getting in the top 100 for being paid each time a block is found shouldn't be an issue of you have 1PH rate.

Yeah, and in the longterm, you will have much more than on Nicehash, which doesn't pay for Tx fees.
I pointed 2x Antminer S9 here so far, along with Antminer U3 (little UFO) Grin

BadgerHobbs

jr. member

Activity: 77

Merit: 3

Join CKPool!

Quote from: SmurfBerry on March 19, 2018, 10:29:22 AM

I have approx 1PH. Would it be easy to configure my Avalon’s to point to this pool? I e tried to read through as much as possible, but it seems different than other pools I’ve used. (slush and NiceHash)

Mining on this pool is as easy as any other. Point your miners to pool.ckpool.org:3333, with your username as the wallet address you want to send your earned BTC too, and with password x.

Rewards will be larger but less often at this pool due to the lower hashrate. And getting in the top 100 for being paid each time a block is found shouldn't be an issue of you have 1PH rate.

SmurfBerry

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

I have approx 1PH. Would it be easy to configure my Avalon’s to point to this pool? I e tried to read through as much as possible, but it seems different than other pools I’ve used. (slush and NiceHash)

flippintwit

member

Activity: 62

Merit: 10

Ahhhhh... That would also explain how/why the derp does the two steps forward, one step back thing.... Duh!

BSGMiner

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 16

1xA921 + 1xA741 + Backup-->1xA6 ;)

Quote from: ComputerGenie on March 16, 2018, 11:54:02 AM

Quote from: BSGMiner on March 16, 2018, 10:50:29 AM

Quote from: ComputerGenie on March 16, 2018, 09:30:09 AM

Quote from: -ck on April 19, 2017, 01:40:41 AM

...The pool's HERP is simply added until it reaches 5 * network difficulty. After that it is biased every minute by scaling existing HERP down to add the latest minute's HERP and all users' HERP is adjusted by the same scale the pool's was...

Cool. Thanks for the clarifying quote.

NP, I find it's always useful to requote the OP to people that seem to have not bothered to read it.

Ouch...

Actually, I previously read all 1,068 words--yep, I counted 'em--of both the Home page and the first post here; however, I must've forgot that it specifically stated that the users' HERP also adheres to the 5Nd.

Maybe what threw me off was how the "[r]ewards accumulate from blocks worked on even if miners are not scheduled for a payout". Hopefully I'm not missing where it specifically states that those accumulated rewards are also diminished along with the rest of the HERP, but I'll just consider that to be the case unless told otherwise. Thanks again!

ComputerGenie

hero member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 552

Retired IRCX God

Quote from: BSGMiner on March 16, 2018, 10:50:29 AM

Quote from: ComputerGenie on March 16, 2018, 09:30:09 AM

Quote from: -ck on April 19, 2017, 01:40:41 AM

...The pool's Herp is simply added until it reaches 5 * network difficulty. After that it is biased every minute by scaling existing herp down to add the latest minute's herp and all users' herp is adjusted by the same scale the pool's was...

Cool. Thanks for the clarifying quote.

NP, I find it's always useful to requote the OP to people that seem to have not bothered to read it.

BSGMiner

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 16

1xA921 + 1xA741 + Backup-->1xA6 ;)

Quote from: ComputerGenie on March 16, 2018, 09:30:09 AM

Quote from: -ck on April 19, 2017, 01:40:41 AM

...The pool's Herp is simply added until it reaches 5 * network difficulty. After that it is biased every minute by scaling existing herp down to add the latest minute's herp and all users' herp is adjusted by the same scale the pool's was...

Cool. Thanks for the clarifying quote.

ComputerGenie

hero member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 552

Retired IRCX God

Quote from: BSGMiner on March 16, 2018, 08:55:00 AM

Just out of curiosity--since my contributions have started to be very intermittent--how long will I keep getting credit for the work I've done so far?

I'm in the mid-400s with HERP in the 60 millions.

Quote from: -ck on April 19, 2017, 01:40:41 AM

...The pool's Herp is simply added until it reaches 5 * network difficulty. After that it is biased every minute by scaling existing herp down to add the latest minute's herp and all users' herp is adjusted by the same scale the pool's was...

BSGMiner

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 16

1xA921 + 1xA741 + Backup-->1xA6 ;)

Just out of curiosity--since my contributions have started to be very intermittent--how long will I keep getting credit for the work I've done so far?

I'm in the mid-400s with HERP in the 60 millions.

ZedZedNova

sr. member

Activity: 475

Merit: 265

Ooh La La, C'est Zoom!

Quote from: gabriel0 on March 14, 2018, 03:31:22 PM

... "Funny to see newer generation device is like 230x times faster than previous one." ...

Because technology waits for nobody. The BM1382 in the U3 looks like it is Bitmain's first 28nm ASIC from 2014 according to their data sheet.

gabriel0

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Quote from: ComputerGenie on March 14, 2018, 12:21:28 PM

For a given hashrate, the U3 uses 6.1458333 times more power(electric) than the S9.
(S9 Electric usage per hash) * (6.145833333333333) = (U3 Electric usage per hash)
Because, math.
Comparing "overall" is like saying a jet uses more fuel than a moped. Roll Eyes

Right, I simply commented his(/her) moped<->jet comparison: "Funny to see newer generation device is like 230x times faster than previous one."
I was saying 230x hashrate because it uses more power, not that it uses 230x more power..

ComputerGenie

hero member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 552

Retired IRCX God

Quote from: gabriel0 on March 14, 2018, 07:30:31 AM

Quote from: ComputerGenie on March 13, 2018, 06:09:11 PM

I'm not sure that the U3 at 590 w/TH (0.59w/GH) is less power than the S9 96 w/TH is "using less power", but ok

If you have one U3 and one S9, I'm pretty sure that although the S9 mines more, it uses significantly more power than the U3, but ok

For a given hashrate, the U3 uses 6.1458333 times more power(electric) than the S9.
(S9 Electric usage per hash) * (6.145833333333333) = (U3 Electric usage per hash)
Because, math.
Comparing "overall" is like saying a jet uses more fuel than a moped. Roll Eyes

gabriel0

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Quote from: ComputerGenie on March 13, 2018, 06:09:11 PM

I'm not sure that the U3 at 590 w/TH (0.59w/GH) is less power than the S9 96 w/TH is "using less power", but ok

If you have one U3 and one S9, I'm pretty sure that although the S9 mines more, it uses significantly more power than the U3, but ok

crypto_curious

full member

Activity: 933

Merit: 175

Quote from: gabriel0 on March 13, 2018, 04:43:26 PM

Quote from: crypto_curious on March 13, 2018, 02:09:27 AM

Hi guys,
I've just added Antminer S9 to the pool: http://ckpool.org/users/bc1qetqswmpvh58hf5059djv9z2qlsa4d448h6we32

Now, mining with Antminer U3 (59 GH/s) and Antminer S9 (13.5 TH/s). Funny to see newer generation device is like 230x times faster than previous one.

Fingers crossed for the block Cheesy

To the old miner's defense, the S9 has about 50x more chips and uses much more power than a U3

That's weak defense:D 50x more chips, but 230x more hashrate Cheesy

ComputerGenie

hero member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 552

Retired IRCX God

Quote from: gabriel0 on March 13, 2018, 04:43:26 PM

To the old miner's defense, the S9 has about 50x more chips and uses much more power than a U3

I'm not sure that the U3 at 590 w/TH (0.59w/GH) is less power than the S9 96 w/TH is "using less power", but ok

gabriel0

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Quote from: crypto_curious on March 13, 2018, 02:09:27 AM

Hi guys,
I've just added Antminer S9 to the pool: http://ckpool.org/users/bc1qetqswmpvh58hf5059djv9z2qlsa4d448h6we32

Now, mining with Antminer U3 (59 GH/s) and Antminer S9 (13.5 TH/s). Funny to see newer generation device is like 230x times faster than previous one.

Fingers crossed for the block Cheesy

To the old miner's defense, the S9 has about 50x more chips and uses much more power than a U3

EarthWide

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: aldoyh on March 13, 2018, 12:11:23 PM

Hello, my herp is 532,529.6888275245
how much is that in satoshi? and how long do I need to reach a payout que/5460 satoshi?

I'm mining now at avg 27Gh/s

See http://ckpool.org/#/user and look at DERP. Expect to wait a good long while at only 27GH/s before you see a payout. But once you start getting payments it's worth it!

aldoyh

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Hello, my herp is 532,529.6888275245
how much is that in satoshi? and how long do I need to reach a payout que/5460 satoshi?

I'm mining now at avg 27Gh/s

crypto_curious

full member

Activity: 933

Merit: 175

Hi guys,
I've just added Antminer S9 to the pool: http://ckpool.org/users/bc1qetqswmpvh58hf5059djv9z2qlsa4d448h6we32

Now, mining with Antminer U3 (59 GH/s) and Antminer S9 (13.5 TH/s). Funny to see newer generation device is like 230x times faster than previous one.

Fingers crossed for the block Cheesy

gabriel0

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Quote from: GatoMinero on March 12, 2018, 07:03:20 AM

Port 3333.

Hi, I work with good number of accepted using cgminer in Windows 7 connecting to port 3333, but in a Rapberry I cant use this port, only 4334, without good results.

May the differents internet networks affects?

How can I test the pool and ports in Debian?

What mining hardware are you using?...

Topic: ckpool.org CLOSED - page 111. (Read 162894 times)