Hopefully it shall help us crack this elusive block. . .
In ck's [BETA] pool, elusive block cracks the pool!- sorry ck, I couldn't resist
.earl
Topic: ckpool.org CLOSED - page 155. (Read 162858 times)
- sorry ck, I couldn't resist
.earl
Good luck to those who find it acceptable, it seems everyone did
I'm here for several reasons, and know that there will be growing pains, and this is an acceptable situation for me.
Things like this happen when you move the bar forward, and though I only have 2TH, it'll be here for the foreseeable future.
That's why it is still a BETA pool
Ok, so we did find a higher share than neccessary to find a block but we didn't crack it. Not even because of an orphan, but because "code exploded".
Damn, I was liking the pool. Enjoyed the low fee and block generation payout, but seems I will have to go back to kano then.
Good luck to those who find it acceptable, it seems everyone did
Damn, I was liking the pool. Enjoyed the low fee and block generation payout, but seems I will have to go back to kano then.
Good luck to those who find it acceptable, it seems everyone did
Ive got a friday feeling we will get one today. Things are going well for once 
You're all my heroes and you shall be nicely rewarded for your dedication in time. 
Taking the pool down yet again, sorry I'm unhappy with how it's running. 
Hopefully the downtime won't be too long.
Hopefully the downtime won't be too long.
I still have hope we will find that block!
Good luck ck fixing the pool!
Pool is back online and I'm doing a lot of regression testing in the meantime still...
Wetsuit's rental is a very substantial contribution to the pool and greatly appreciated. Hopefully it shall help us crack this elusive block and put this behind us.
Taking the pool down yet again, sorry I'm unhappy with how it's running.
Hopefully the downtime won't be too long.
Hopefully the downtime won't be too long.
I still have hope we will find that block!
Good luck ck fixing the pool!
Taking the pool down yet again, sorry I'm unhappy with how it's running.
Hopefully the downtime won't be too long.
Hopefully the downtime won't be too long.
I think we all need to wait for -ck to tell us what actually happened before we start jumping to conclusions... and that's all anyone can say at this point.
Code exploded with that and didn't find a block so I'm gonna take the pool down for a bit to resuscitate it.
None of your share counts will be lost.
None of your share counts will be lost.
Code exploded with that and didn't find a block so I'm gonna take the pool down for a bit to resuscitate it.
None of your share counts will be lost.
Sorry, but what do you mean? None of your share counts will be lost.
Nicehash recently implemented a minimum difficulty for all algo's the list is at https://new.nicehash.com/pool-operators sha256 is currently minimum difficulty of 16384. Just personal opinion but it seems like a cash grab on their part.
Code exploded with that and didn't find a block so I'm gonna take the pool down for a bit to resuscitate it.
None of your share counts will be lost.
EDIT: Back online with fixes, and changed minimum diff to 16k to appease NH.
None of your share counts will be lost.
EDIT: Back online with fixes, and changed minimum diff to 16k to appease NH.
http://ckpool.org/users/176sh81PQupUsFyX6hNL2PTYydSuL7Wu73
"hashrate1m": "3.84P",
"hashrate5m": "5.64P",
"hashrate1hr": "2P",
"hashrate1d": "645T",
"hashrate7d": "408T",
"lastshare": 1499971613,
"workers": 64,
"shares": 97198635892,
"bestshare": 1544840111559.0,
"lns": 97198635892.10001
Wow, and that wasn't a block find?
Am very curious to know what happened"hashrate1m": "3.84P",
"hashrate5m": "5.64P",
"hashrate1hr": "2P",
"hashrate1d": "645T",
"hashrate7d": "408T",
"lastshare": 1499971613,
"workers": 64,
"shares": 97198635892,
"bestshare": 1544840111559.0,
"lns": 97198635892.10001
Wow, and that wasn't a block find?
A high share does not guarantee a block find but man, that would have been nice if that was the first block.
http://ckpool.org/users/176sh81PQupUsFyX6hNL2PTYydSuL7Wu73
"hashrate1m": "3.84P",
"hashrate5m": "5.64P",
"hashrate1hr": "2P",
"hashrate1d": "645T",
"hashrate7d": "408T",
"lastshare": 1499971613,
"workers": 64,
"shares": 97198635892,
"bestshare": 1544840111559.0,
"lns": 97198635892.10001
Wow, and that wasn't a block find?
Am very curious to know what happened "hashrate1m": "3.84P",
"hashrate5m": "5.64P",
"hashrate1hr": "2P",
"hashrate1d": "645T",
"hashrate7d": "408T",
"lastshare": 1499971613,
"workers": 64,
"shares": 97198635892,
"bestshare": 1544840111559.0,
"lns": 97198635892.10001
Wow, and that wasn't a block find?
http://ckpool.org/users/176sh81PQupUsFyX6hNL2PTYydSuL7Wu73
"hashrate1m": "3.84P",
"hashrate5m": "5.64P",
"hashrate1hr": "2P",
"hashrate1d": "645T",
"hashrate7d": "408T",
"lastshare": 1499971613,
"workers": 64,
"shares": 97198635892,
"bestshare": 1544840111559.0,
"lns": 97198635892.10001
Wow, and that wasn't a block find?
"hashrate1m": "3.84P",
"hashrate5m": "5.64P",
"hashrate1hr": "2P",
"hashrate1d": "645T",
"hashrate7d": "408T",
"lastshare": 1499971613,
"workers": 64,
"shares": 97198635892,
"bestshare": 1544840111559.0,
"lns": 97198635892.10001
Wow, and that wasn't a block find?
hmmm
Can't see how that wasn't a block, unless it got orphaned?
Looks like someone got a rental working.
Yup, lets get this block!
Looks like someone got a rental working.
I spent way more than I should have on nh rentals and never had a diff issue, must be something new on their end.
Nicehash shows the order as dead and status as "Disconnected. Pool difficulty too low." but they haven't refunded me the remaining money for the order and are also not sending any hash to ckpool. Made another deposit to try it out but waiting for confirmations for over an hour now.
Jump to: