Pages:
Author

Topic: Claymore XPM GPU Miner discussion - page 63. (Read 142112 times)

donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
April 07, 2014, 03:14:34 AM
#98
Readme.txt is very useful:

...
IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT MINING XPM ON YPOOL

You cannot estimate your eranings until you run miner for at least 24 hours.
A lot of people start miner for 3-6 hours and then claim that they earn too small amounts.
Ypool calculates earnings based on last 160 blocks that were found by Ypool, so you need to wait
at least 5*160 blocks until you see real earnings, it is about 12 hours.
Another important thing is that Ypool gives you big share values only when you found 9ch or 10ch shares,
it takes several hours to find such shares, so to estimate your profit you need at least 24 hours of mining.

So the correct way to calculate earnings is: mine for 24 hours and then check your earning per block in pool statistics,
and multiplicate it by blocks that ypool finds per 24 hours. Or mine for 48 hours and then take earnings for last 24 hours.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
April 07, 2014, 02:44:30 AM
#97
and has to be?
the first card finds much - the second few
all cards r9 280x vapor-x

member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
April 07, 2014, 02:41:18 AM
#96
Dont know if im doing anything wrong but this thing doesnt seem profitable at all. some stats:

-gpu: r9 270
-ch/h: 31000(4ch), 25(7ch), 1,4(8ch), 0(9ch,10ch,11ch,12ch)
-Share value/h reported by ypool: 4,4
-estimated XPM/day = 0,25XPM  Cry

Any thoughts? Huh
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
April 07, 2014, 02:27:03 AM
#95
v 1.4

Nonce overflow, new timestamp << --- test on ati270x

v.1.3

not found this message

It's not a bug, as soon as nonce overflow detected new timestamp is used and mining is continued.

i use ati 270x , cpu e7300 , ram 2 gb , win8.1 , driver 13.2 is crash not over 10 minute on run claymore 1.4 and run other programs is stable example.
- sgminer
- cgminer
- claymore v1.3

not found this problem
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
April 07, 2014, 01:52:00 AM
#94
v 1.4

Nonce overflow, new timestamp << --- test on ati270x

v.1.3

not found this message

It's not a bug, as soon as nonce overflow detected new timestamp is used and mining is continued.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
April 07, 2014, 01:41:39 AM
#93
ypool has such a strange way to show statitics, I never understand it
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
April 07, 2014, 12:56:33 AM
#92
ss 2 need to slowle cards. my cards is 80% load and do not need ss 2 Smiley
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
April 07, 2014, 12:44:14 AM
#91
it is possible an example of a bat file for 280х

my 2x 280x -
 ch/h: [  44677]
 ch/h: [  41863]

and make that all cards were started from 1 bat file


1bat:NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u YourLogin.WorkerName -p YourPassword -di 0 -ss 2
2bat:NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u YourLogin.WorkerName -p YourPassword -di 1 -ss 2

-ss 2? my cards is 80% load with no ss 2

YES my cards is 96-97%
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
April 07, 2014, 12:41:24 AM
#90
Drivers from the 13.11 update to 14.3 (3X280X) 2X280X R7970 1X280X R200 system to recognize, and then run the program this tip: do not know what reason
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples:'amdil-pc-unknown-amdo
Pencl'and'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples:'amdil-pc-unknown-amdo
Pencl'and'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples:'amdil-pc-unknown-amdo
Pencl'and'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: While resolving call to function'barrier'arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function'barrier'arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function'barrier'arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function'barrier'arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function'barrier'arguments were dropped!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples:'amdil-pc-unknown-amdo
Pencl'and'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples:'amdil-pc-unknown-amdo
Pencl'and'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples:'amdil-pc-unknown-amdo
Pencl'and'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: While resolving call to function'barrier'arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function'barrier'arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function'barrier'arguments were dropped!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples:'amdil-pc-unknown-amdo
Pencl'and'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples:'amdil-pc-unknown-amdo
Pencl'and'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples:'amdil-pc-unknown-amdo
Pencl'and'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: While resolving call to function'barrier'arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function'barrier'arguments were dropped!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples:'amdil-pc-unknown-amdo
Pencl'and'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples:'amdil-pc-unknown-amdo
Pencl'and'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
April 07, 2014, 12:32:25 AM
#89
it is possible an example of a bat file for 280х

my 2x 280x -
 ch/h: [  44677]
 ch/h: [  41863]

and make that all cards were started from 1 bat file


1bat:NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u YourLogin.WorkerName -p YourPassword -di 0 -ss 2
2bat:NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u YourLogin.WorkerName -p YourPassword -di 1 -ss 2

-ss 2? my cards is 80% load with no ss 2
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
April 06, 2014, 11:51:46 PM
#88
If many words, whether can use different miners in order to enhance the speed?
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
April 06, 2014, 11:46:42 PM
#87
it is possible an example of a bat file for 280х

my 2x 280x -
 ch/h: [  44677]
 ch/h: [  41863]

and make that all cards were started from 1 bat file


1bat:NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u YourLogin.WorkerName -p YourPassword -di 0 -ss 2
2bat:NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u YourLogin.WorkerName -p YourPassword -di 1 -ss 2
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
April 06, 2014, 11:41:14 PM
#86
v 1.4

Nonce overflow, new timestamp << --- test on ati270x

v.1.3

not found this message

As soon as i run the second bat for the second gpu the system crashes. Using v1.4, 2x r9 270, 2500k, win 8.1, gtx770 as primary card.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
April 06, 2014, 11:13:29 PM
#85
v 1.4

Nonce overflow, new timestamp << --- test on ati270x

v.1.3

not found this message
sr. member
Activity: 251
Merit: 250
April 06, 2014, 10:56:35 PM
#84
If you're sad now about losing your CPU coin why not point your power at RIC?
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
April 06, 2014, 10:33:17 PM
#83
Waiting for 5970 and 5870s version

HD5000 series and HD6000 series run VLIW architecture, the miner currently only support GCN architecture that's in the HD7000 series and R series. So, unless someone wants to code it, there won't be support for the older cards for quite some time. I own 5 out of 7 cards that use VLIW.
full member
Activity: 157
Merit: 100
April 06, 2014, 08:26:11 PM
#82
Waiting for 5970 and 5870s version
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
April 06, 2014, 05:51:12 PM
#81
Testing for fun with a HD7850 2GB card and getting time=1574~1597. It works for this card, but it's slow. The R9 equivalent card is the R9 265.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
April 06, 2014, 04:05:12 PM
#80
v1.4 released, mining speed is faster by 10% now.

This information is not correct. I am seeing an increase of 16% in mining speed. My 290s now mine at 80k each.

Edit: Getting total round time of 570-580, varies a little card by card, cards running stock clocks. Using I7 4770k.

Ok I just increased the core clock to 1200 mhz, im getting 95k ch/h (4ch) and round times of around 490. The nice thing is im still using less electricity than mining scrypt on stock clocks.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
PM for journalist,typing,and data entry services.
April 06, 2014, 03:54:31 PM
#79
This no work with 7xxx series?

It works for the HD7xxx series, but ideally for 290/290x. Worked for my HD7970.

Oh okay, will test out on my 7750, and report back!
Pages:
Jump to: