Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 238.

trimac

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: daeminium on August 29, 2014, 10:59:13 AM

10:37:34:473 848 WATCHDOG: Thread 0 hangs in OpenCL call, you need to restart miner Sad

10:37:34:473   848   watchdog - thread 1, hb time 0
10:37:34:473   848   watchdog - thread 2, hb time 27690
10:37:34:473   848   watchdog - thread 3, hb time 0
10:37:34:478   848   WATCHDOG: GPU memory error, you need to restart miner
10:37:34:478   c38   08/29/14-10:37:34 - New job received from xmr.extremehash.com:9999
10:37:34:478   c38   Speed: 1520 h/s, TotalHashes: 2366K, DevHashes: 117K Mining time:
10:37:34:483   c38   00:26
10:37:34:508   c30   Round
10:37:34:730   c2c   Job changed, drop current round
10:37:34:730   c2c   Dev round
10:37:34:740   c34   Job changed, drop current round
10:37:34:740   c34   Round
10:37:34:832   c28   Job changed, drop current round
10:37:34:832   c28   Round
10:37:35:162   848   Restarting OK, exit...

what's up?

Lol, I have same thing happening to me too. Since I know that at least one of 4 GPU's in that rig isn't in 100% good condition, I presumed that thread number equals GPU number. Does anyone know is my assumption correct? Is thread number = GPU number?

daeminium

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 252

10:37:34:473 848 WATCHDOG: Thread 0 hangs in OpenCL call, you need to restart miner Sad

10:37:34:473   848   watchdog - thread 1, hb time 0
10:37:34:473   848   watchdog - thread 2, hb time 27690
10:37:34:473   848   watchdog - thread 3, hb time 0
10:37:34:478   848   WATCHDOG: GPU memory error, you need to restart miner
10:37:34:478   c38   08/29/14-10:37:34 - New job received from xmr.extremehash.com:9999
10:37:34:478   c38   Speed: 1520 h/s, TotalHashes: 2366K, DevHashes: 117K Mining time:
10:37:34:483   c38   00:26
10:37:34:508   c30   Round
10:37:34:730   c2c   Job changed, drop current round
10:37:34:730   c2c   Dev round
10:37:34:740   c34   Job changed, drop current round
10:37:34:740   c34   Round
10:37:34:832   c28   Job changed, drop current round
10:37:34:832   c28   Round
10:37:35:162   848   Restarting OK, exit...

what's up?

dunchy

sr. member

Activity: 299

Merit: 250

My stats:

3 x R9 290 (sapphire, powercolor and gigabyte). That's without "x".
14.7 driver
12GB RAM
claymore 6.1

Surprising 1960 H/s

I run with -a 1 switch nothing else changed..

I'm using Corsair AX1200i PSU with corsair link dongle so I can report power usage as well: it's between 250 - 270 W per card. Powercolor being the most greedy one...

Temps: ~78C on all of them. They are working at room temperature with no additional fans just their own.

ans34

full member

Activity: 161

Merit: 100

Quote from: Prelude on August 29, 2014, 12:00:52 AM

Can't say I'm familiar with CPU mining Monero. How far ahead are GPUs compared to CPUs?

GPUs are about 3 times faster than CPU

Prelude

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1000

Quote from: infofront on August 28, 2014, 10:18:36 PM

Quote from: Prelude on August 28, 2014, 09:42:05 PM

Quote from: nrg_wolf on August 26, 2014, 03:10:58 AM

Iam more curious as to when we shall see some form of update with some speed boost's as that cant be all this algo can produce.... 280x with hynix does 550h/s overclocked.
7950 with hynix can do 520 h/s clocked.....

not much of a difference between cards.

Speed boosts are useless. Everyone will get the same boost, so you'll end up earning the same amount of XPM when difficulty rises but using more electricity and with hotter GPUs.

Well, it would give us an advantage against CPU miners, of which there are still many.

Can't say I'm familiar with CPU mining Monero. How far ahead are GPUs compared to CPUs?

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 2842

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: Prelude on August 28, 2014, 09:42:05 PM

Quote from: nrg_wolf on August 26, 2014, 03:10:58 AM

Iam more curious as to when we shall see some form of update with some speed boost's as that cant be all this algo can produce.... 280x with hynix does 550h/s overclocked.
7950 with hynix can do 520 h/s clocked.....

not much of a difference between cards.

Speed boosts are useless. Everyone will get the same boost, so you'll end up earning the same amount of XPM when difficulty rises but using more electricity and with hotter GPUs.

Well, it would give us an advantage against CPU miners, of which there are still many.

Prelude

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1000

Quote from: nrg_wolf on August 26, 2014, 03:10:58 AM

Iam more curious as to when we shall see some form of update with some speed boost's as that cant be all this algo can produce.... 280x with hynix does 550h/s overclocked.
7950 with hynix can do 520 h/s clocked.....

not much of a difference between cards.

Speed boosts are useless. Everyone will get the same boost, so you'll end up earning the same amount of XPM when difficulty rises but using more electricity and with hotter GPUs.

liyan4168

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

windows M7 GPU OpenCL miner

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 2842

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: bonosurgut on August 27, 2014, 09:32:31 PM

Quote from: infofront on August 27, 2014, 10:45:14 AM

I specify -a 3 in my .bat, but it always runs at -a 1
Am I doing something wrong here?

post here your bat file

After re-examining my bat, I realized I had forgot to put a 1 after -wd. This was causing the problem. Anyway, thanks for prompting me to look at my bat again!

bonosurgut

hero member

Activity: 520

Merit: 500

Quote from: infofront on August 27, 2014, 10:45:14 AM

I specify -a 3 in my .bat, but it always runs at -a 1
Am I doing something wrong here?

post here your bat file

sammy007

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1003

Quote from: Claymore on August 27, 2014, 09:56:12 AM

I will release Linux version in a few days. Also I'm working on implementing fans/temp control in the miner.

Cool, finally.

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 2842

Shitcoin Minimalist

I specify -a 3 in my .bat, but it always runs at -a 1
Am I doing something wrong here?

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

I will release Linux version in a few days. Also I'm working on implementing fans/temp control in the miner.

bigj

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 100

Quote from: infofront on August 26, 2014, 09:59:45 PM

Quote from: kov on August 25, 2014, 01:19:50 PM

Patiently awaiting *nix version

Me too!

Yes, some new/updated tool/toy would be fine/awesome!

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 2842

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: kov on August 25, 2014, 01:19:50 PM

Patiently awaiting *nix version

Me too!

ozzy1926

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

no more updates?

bensam123

sr. member

Activity: 423

Merit: 250

With scrypt there was a pretty big difference between getting a good ratio and just running whatever, which was anywhere from 1-20% difference, sometimes more.

nrg_wolf

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Iam more curious as to when we shall see some form of update with some speed boost's as that cant be all this algo can produce.... 280x with hynix does 550h/s overclocked.
7950 with hynix can do 520 h/s clocked.....

not much of a difference between cards.

sammy007

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1003

Quote from: bensam123 on August 26, 2014, 01:44:40 AM

I was about to ask if Claymore is back to what Scrypt was at. Modded bioses were big back with scrypt. Is Claymore also really sensitive to memory:core ratios? Scrypt had issues with that, but it disappeared with x11-15.

I prefer default memory and gpu clocks, just adjusted target temp to run less then 75 C. Good result so far. You can waste more shares by wasting a time in order to find some barely noticeable gain. Just let 'em mine.

bensam123

sr. member

Activity: 423

Merit: 250

I was about to ask if Claymore is back to what Scrypt was at. Modded bioses were big back with scrypt. Is Claymore also really sensitive to memory:core ratios? Scrypt had issues with that, but it disappeared with x11-15.

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 238. (Read 2145062 times)