Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 320. (Read 2145059 times)
+1 for a linux miner
still drops cards randomly in multicard rigs.....
2*r9 280x + 5770
06/05/14-10:55:53 - New job received
Speed: 578 h/s, TotalHashes: 218K, DevHashes: 10K Mining time: 00:06
06/05/14-10:55:59 - SHARE FOUND! - (GPU 0)
06/05/14-10:55:53 - New job received
Speed: 578 h/s, TotalHashes: 218K, DevHashes: 10K Mining time: 00:06
06/05/14-10:55:59 - SHARE FOUND! - (GPU 0)
80% faster than my single core i7, 4 cores (OC-ed). 3 high-end VGA card combined <> 1 single core i7 CPU, 4 cores
Another comparison (excluding pool/exchange fees/taxes):
Processor: 4820k, 4 cores w/ AES accel, 126w resting, 171w mining, 45w used for mining. Delivers 180 hash/sec. 4 hash/watt.
Edit: Forgot to mention this is on windows, you probably see much better numbers for at least the CPU on linux
My core i5 2500k delivers 230 H/s in Ubuntu 14.04, which is higher than 1 single R9 270 (190 - 210 H/s) on Windows
I don't see how MRO is better than QCN 
QCN is a Monero clone which bring the following "advantages":
+ Incompetent dev: see commits from QCN devs in github
+ Weak network: orphan blocks all the time (too many, too frequent). Find them in any QC pool
+ Weak community
Also Monero is a Bytecoin clone which:
Had an unfair launch
Has a too steep emission curve
Yup, Bytecoin is 83% premined before launch. I will not call it "unfair launch" but "scammy launch". If you search for "bytecoin" in bitcointalk, you will find that "bytecoin" and "scam" looks like synonyms.
Also, what is your definition of "too steep"? How is "not too steep"?
Still no quazarcoin pool ready?
i know the deserves a % of or some form of donation for this miner, but its really annoying the way it drops for his share....
...failed to connect?
it gives timeout
is there a pool that we can we mine QCN with a gpu ?
1324H on 4x R9 280x
I don't see how MRO is better than QCN
QCN is a Monero clone which bring the following "advantages":
+ Incompetent dev: see commits from QCN devs in github
+ Weak network: orphan blocks all the time (too many, too frequent). Find them in any QC pool
+ Weak community
Also Monero is a Bytecoin clone which:
Had an unfair launch
Has a too steep emission curve
any linux miner on plan?
2*r9 280x + 5770
06/05/14-10:55:53 - New job received
Speed: 578 h/s, TotalHashes: 218K, DevHashes: 10K Mining time: 00:06
06/05/14-10:55:59 - SHARE FOUND! - (GPU 0)
06/05/14-10:55:53 - New job received
Speed: 578 h/s, TotalHashes: 218K, DevHashes: 10K Mining time: 00:06
06/05/14-10:55:59 - SHARE FOUND! - (GPU 0)
80% faster than my single core i7, 4 cores (OC-ed). 3 high-end VGA card combined <> 1 single core i7 CPU, 4 cores
Another comparison (excluding pool/exchange fees/taxes):
Processor: 4820k, 4 cores w/ AES accel, 126w resting, 171w mining, 45w used for mining. Delivers 180 hash/sec. 4 hash/watt. Cost: $324 New. Hash/$ = .56 . Monthly Power cost (me): $5.185. Net @ 4.47M# = (.002532BTC/MRO * 29.18MRO/Month * $645.97/BTC) = $47.73. Net = $42.54. ROI = 7.6 months
GPU: r9 290, stock clocks, 216w used for mining (Comp w/ GPU mining - Comp w/ no GPU hooked to pwr.), 437.5 h/s. 2.02 hash/watt. Cost: ~$420 New. Hash/$ = 1.04 . Monthly Power cost (me): $24.4. Net @ 4.47M# = (.002532BTC/MRO * 70.92MRO/Month * $645.97/BTC) = $91.6. ROI = 4.6 months
GPU has about a 1.65:1 edge over the CPU for ROI
CPU has about a 1.97:1 edge over the GPU for hash/watt operating costs
GPU has about a 1.86:1 edge over the CPU for Hash/$ investment
Really interesting numbers .. too close to call it for either one at this point. Every update or optimization changes these numbers and there's been lots, for at least the CPU over the last month. Anyone know any other PoW that has such a small gap between CPU's and GPU's?
Edit: Forgot to mention this is on windows, you probably see much better numbers for at least the CPU on linux
I don't see how MRO is better than QCN
QCN is a Monero clone which bring the following "advantages":
+ Incompetent dev: see commits from QCN devs in github
+ Weak network: orphan blocks all the time (too many, too frequent). Find them in any QC pool
+ Weak community
2*r9 280x + 5770
06/05/14-10:55:53 - New job received
Speed: 578 h/s, TotalHashes: 218K, DevHashes: 10K Mining time: 00:06
06/05/14-10:55:59 - SHARE FOUND! - (GPU 0)
06/05/14-10:55:53 - New job received
Speed: 578 h/s, TotalHashes: 218K, DevHashes: 10K Mining time: 00:06
06/05/14-10:55:59 - SHARE FOUND! - (GPU 0)
80% faster than my single core i7, 4 cores (OC-ed). 3 high-end VGA card combined <> 1 single core i7 CPU, 4 cores
5870 only ~ 70 h/s.
A little bit faster than my core i5 model M, the slowest core i5 CPU. Also, if you are using Claymore GPU miner you are charging a developer fee of 5%. Actually, GPU miner may mine at loss: high developer fee + high power consumption + pool fee
2*r9 280x + 5770
06/05/14-10:55:53 - New job received
Speed: 578 h/s, TotalHashes: 218K, DevHashes: 10K Mining time: 00:06
06/05/14-10:55:59 - SHARE FOUND! - (GPU 0)
06/05/14-10:55:53 - New job received
Speed: 578 h/s, TotalHashes: 218K, DevHashes: 10K Mining time: 00:06
06/05/14-10:55:59 - SHARE FOUND! - (GPU 0)
5870 only ~ 70 h/s.
Is it possible to mine solo with this miner?
Jump to: