Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1259.

osnwt

sr. member

Activity: 353

Merit: 251

Quote from: Claymore on June 28, 2016, 06:36:06 AM

v4.7:

- improved stability of Linux version.

Yes, I should confirm that since 4.6beta3 there is no more resource leakage in Linux version.

Also just received a report that there were recently another issues with DwarfPool so it rejected a lot of shares in a raw. But this time it was not CDM, but another miner. So I tend to think that my issue with 4.6 was not a miner fault. All I needed was to have an option to restart miner not after some percent of rejects, but after some percent per time interval or sliding window.

citronick

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1080

---- winter*juvia -----

Quote from: Claymore on June 28, 2016, 06:36:06 AM

v4.7:

- improved stability of Linux version.
- fixed issue with possible crash if pool sends several jobs at once.
- added "-li" option.
- bug fixes.
- EthMan: added more options for sound notification.
- EthMan: added option to adjust hashrate warning threshold.

Also I'm working on v5 with some new coin for dual mining.

wow.... new coin?

ETH and ??

Give us a hint Claymore Shocked

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

v4.7:

- improved stability of Linux version.
- fixed issue with possible crash if pool sends several jobs at once.
- added "-li" option.
- bug fixes.
- EthMan: added more options for sound notification.
- EthMan: added option to adjust hashrate warning threshold.

Also I'm working on v5 with some new coin for dual mining.

GH

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 10

LOL, I should really have checked this before myself... Undecided

No clue why it was enabled on only these three, but of course you are right - deactivating CrossFire was the (logical) solution.

Thanks for your help and your miner, have a nice day!

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: GH on June 28, 2016, 04:18:36 AM

Hello,

I know that there is a problem ordering the GPUs via OpenCL/ADL, but we have a slightly different issue here: OpenCL detects 2 of 2 GPUs, but the temperature is only shown for one of the two. OHM and own monitoring script show both cards.
The problem occurs on only 3 of 10 identical or very similar rigs (HW+Windows version). The result is that I can not use the built in clock/temperature control of the miner.
Any ideas?

Thanks!

1. Disable CrossFire.
2. You have dual card like 7990. Unfortunately, I don't have such cards to test.

GH

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 10

Hello,

I know that there is a problem ordering the GPUs via OpenCL/ADL, but we have a slightly different issue here: OpenCL detects 2 of 2 GPUs, but the temperature is only shown for one of the two. OHM and own monitoring script show both cards.
The problem occurs on only 3 of 10 identical or very similar rigs (HW+Windows version). The result is that I can not use the built in clock/temperature control of the miner.
Any ideas?

Thanks!

tolazy

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: CoRpO on June 28, 2016, 01:28:10 AM

Quote from: tolazy on June 28, 2016, 01:15:52 AM

anyone have a link for catalyst 15.12 driver.

think i've seen someone talking about driver dll's they put in the claymore miner or have i missunderstand that

There you go : http://www.techpowerup.com/218461/amd-releases-radeon-software-crimson-edition-15-12-whql

thx.

CoRpO

full member

Activity: 185

Merit: 100

Quote from: tolazy on June 28, 2016, 01:15:52 AM

anyone have a link for catalyst 15.12 driver.

think i've seen someone talking about driver dll's they put in the claymore miner or have i missunderstand that

There you go : http://www.techpowerup.com/218461/amd-releases-radeon-software-crimson-edition-15-12-whql

tolazy

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

anyone have a link for catalyst 15.12 driver.

think i've seen someone talking about driver dll's they put in the claymore miner or have i missunderstand that

almond

sr. member

Activity: 407

Merit: 254

Quote from: merc84 on June 27, 2016, 04:49:00 PM

Quote from: osnwt on June 27, 2016, 10:21:10 AM

Quote from: citronick on June 27, 2016, 10:08:11 AM

suprnova closes their ETH pool... Sad

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15383242

And strictly speaking, they're right. Any fork breaks the main idea of blockchain, making Ethereum NOT that declared on their main page.

The worst thing is that so called hacker may be wrong in general, but strictly complied with the terms of TheDAO contract. Any fork means that a 3rd-party changes the rules of the game on the fly in favor of someone just because some business made something wrong and lost some investments. Any investment is a risk, and they should learn the lesson, fix it and move on. Instead, due to conflict of interests being in both Ethereum foundation and TheDAO curators, they decided to prove the world that they are right to break own rules just because they lost some money due to own fault. Be that a smaller project that failed, no one would ever thought about any forks. But this one just "too big to fail", and that's sad.

No any polls and votes should be treated as the network consensus - they just mean that people trust to the founders without own investigation. If one said 'theft', they do not do own judgement. And just led by a false goal. Killing the whole Ethereum thing as a result.

I don't agree with the premise "people just trust the founders", I dare say there are enough intelligent individuals who can make up their own mind on the subject. A soft-fork is a change of the rules using the existing code that requires consensus, it really does not get more democratic or decentralized than that. If you don't agree with the soft fork u have various avenues to express that so that ur vote is counted. I would agree with Suprnova in case of a hard fork but not for this soft fork.

If there had been a cryptographic gap, in other words a transaction were erased or created that altered the blockchain, I would be in OC's camp. But this soft fork is simply a change in the protocol. Just like the soft fork for Homestead, so there's already been a softfork.

If there is a hard fork, I would probably continue with my eth investment program, but OC would be correct and his argument unassailable at that point.

I respect OC's current decision, nonetheless. I've spent much mining time at Suprnova and one of the things that makes the site reliable and comfortable are OC's well considered ethics.

merc84

hero member

Activity: 799

Merit: 1000

Quote from: osnwt on June 27, 2016, 10:21:10 AM

Quote from: citronick on June 27, 2016, 10:08:11 AM

suprnova closes their ETH pool... Sad

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15383242

And strictly speaking, they're right. Any fork breaks the main idea of blockchain, making Ethereum NOT that declared on their main page.

The worst thing is that so called hacker may be wrong in general, but strictly complied with the terms of TheDAO contract. Any fork means that a 3rd-party changes the rules of the game on the fly in favor of someone just because some business made something wrong and lost some investments. Any investment is a risk, and they should learn the lesson, fix it and move on. Instead, due to conflict of interests being in both Ethereum foundation and TheDAO curators, they decided to prove the world that they are right to break own rules just because they lost some money due to own fault. Be that a smaller project that failed, no one would ever thought about any forks. But this one just "too big to fail", and that's sad.

No any polls and votes should be treated as the network consensus - they just mean that people trust to the founders without own investigation. If one said 'theft', they do not do own judgement. And just led by a false goal. Killing the whole Ethereum thing as a result.

I don't agree with the premise "people just trust the founders", I dare say there are enough intelligent individuals who can make up their own mind on the subject. A soft-fork is a change of the rules using the existing code that requires consensus, it really does not get more democratic or decentralized than that. If you don't agree with the soft fork u have various avenues to express that so that ur vote is counted. I would agree with Suprnova in case of a hard fork but not for this soft fork.

hawkfish007

hero member

Activity: 895

Merit: 504

Quote from: Longsnowsm on June 27, 2016, 04:15:28 PM

Just a heads up on some of the leaked tests have indicated some heat issues. So I thought I might mention it. I would like to see more tests in the wild before I want to go crazy buying cards, or wait until the aftermarket manufacturers cards start to appear in the market. Maybe you could post some results of your tests once you get your cards Hawkfish007?

Sure I should get enough to build 2 6 card rigs at release depending on B&H, and planning to preorder more from Newegg when available with BTC. My Nanos maintained 74C even when my garage ambient was 115F. These cards supposedly use less wattage than Nano. You may be waiting a good month or two for aftermarket designs but who knows.

Longsnowsm

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 517

Just a heads up on some of the leaked tests have indicated some heat issues. So I thought I might mention it. I would like to see more tests in the wild before I want to go crazy buying cards, or wait until the aftermarket manufacturers cards start to appear in the market. Maybe you could post some results of your tests once you get your cards Hawkfish007?

hawkfish007

hero member

Activity: 895

Merit: 504

Quote from: Longsnowsm on June 27, 2016, 03:30:17 PM

Any idea if these cards on B&H are reference cards or if they will include the better cooling options like the normal aftermarket manufacturers cards?

They are most probably reference design, after market ones should be available at a later date. My reference Nanos stays at 74C no matter what the ambient is without any external fan, so I am not worried much.

Longsnowsm

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 517

Any idea if these cards on B&H are reference cards or if they will include the better cooling options like the normal aftermarket manufacturers cards?

hawkfish007

hero member

Activity: 895

Merit: 504

Quote from: madmartyk on June 27, 2016, 10:33:15 AM

Quote from: Trimegistus on June 27, 2016, 10:29:16 AM

Quote from: madmartyk on June 27, 2016, 10:23:50 AM

Quote from: Trimegistus on June 27, 2016, 10:17:32 AM

Quote from: madmartyk on June 27, 2016, 10:11:47 AM

anyone got any lines on who is taking pre-orders for the AMD RX 480s yet?

B&H but the prices are outrageous... Grin

Check it out:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1261505-REG/index.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1261970-REG/msi_radeon_rx_480_8g_rdn_rx_480_gddr5.html

$10 over retail, but I don't like the July delivery date!!

I don't think $284 is $10 over retail...

2nd link says $239, I'm actually hoping for a gigabyte version

That's actually MSI brand, preordered a dozen hoping they will ship as soon as they are available.

gollygosh

full member

Activity: 160

Merit: 100

http://hexus.net/tech/news/graphics/93998-amd-radeon-wattman-overclocking-tool-details-leak/

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: adamvp on June 27, 2016, 01:47:15 PM

so I should modify
-ethi parameter to -4196 or sth??

10% of rejects on ETH means that you have bad internet connection, or use bad pool, it is not related to miner settings.

adamvp

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 708

so I should modify
-ethi parameter to -4196 or sth??

Balbec

newbie

Activity: 45

Merit: 0

Quote from: adamvp on June 27, 2016, 12:37:33 PM

What is good invalid rate for eth mining? Sometimes i have almost 10% invalids per round Sad

If pool is well operated and tuned you'll got 0% bad shares, because they become stale and good pools accept them too. If pool reject your share it means someone who have faster ping to pool's node have made the same right hash just before you or mined block just solve and becomes outdated. That is why 8x intensity better than 16x even with lower hashrate.

By the way, pool mining makes your hashrate obsolete. Sharerate is the thing.)

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1259. (Read 6590757 times)