Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 277. (Read 6590565 times)

https://premiumminer.com/images/advert.png

https://premiumminer.com/

0% FEE UNTIL BETA PERIOD - REAL 1% FEE AFTER BETA.
NO HIDDEN FEES
REGULAR PAYS - 2 HOURS

Claymore Dual Mining XVG-blake2s:
-o stratum+tcp://mine.premiumminer.com:5766 -dwal -dpsw c=XVG

Thanks for joining.
[/quote]

Thanks for the response, i will try and check..
Will inform you..

Try VM 32000

Hello Gents,

I would like to share my issue using claymore (new or old) versions.
My RIG consists of 3 AMD and 7 Nvidia (2x1080 and 5x1080Ti).
When i ran it for mining only Ethereum, there's a "Cuda error 11 - cannot write buffer for DAG".
I already put VM max to 16000MB , but still it will show this error.

Experiment 1 : I separate running my bat file for the 3 AMD ( -platform 1 , all are working and running ), then ran the 7 Nvidia bat file (-platform 2, 2-3 cards has this error)
Experiment 2 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3) all AMD and Nvidia Cards, results still the same 2-3 cards has the error.
Experiment 3 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3 , -di 01234567), AMD and Nvidia ( excluding 2 cards  - either AMD or Nvidia) it works fine and continuously running..

So , is there any limitation for the claymore miner in number of cards in RIG?

Thanks and much appreciated if you can clear this up..

Thanks! I'll give that a try... is it because it's simply stable or that one can overclock cards higher than when using newer drivers? (I have 1060 6GB cards)

I'm using the latest AMD Adrenalin drivers and latest Claymore miner and they work perfectly on my RX570 with custom BIOS.

Blockchain performed best for me for a long time.  But recently I tried 18.12 with 11.6 on my 12-card mixed rig and it's more stable and slightly (very slightly) higher hash rate.

I have custom bioses.

Does it work with BIOS modded cards?
I've seen conflicting info about which Adrenalin drivers do so and which don't.

That's also why Claymore's recommendation of 16.12.x made ZERO sense, as 16.11.x and up DISABLED support for BIOS modded cards while 16.9.x and 16.10.x DID work with them.

That poll was closed before your post about it was made, and the ETH dev team has already stated they will not waste time forking ETH over the E3 - but do reserve the option to do so if something more powerful shows up.

I have a problem with one of my rigs running claymore v11.6 -

- EthDcrMiner64.exe stopped working. -

The big issue is actually the stupid windows error window (the one that pops up) that "locks" my miner and it is unable to restart, or even restart my rig.

Is there any way to keep the cmd window with claymore active or to automatically close the "Error" popup window?

Much appreciated.

Tried to use it in config.txt file - got this  :

ETH: No pools specified! Specify at least one valid pool in "-epool" parameter.

Im on the same issue, random hash drops from 31 to 21mh (rx570/470) could someone give few advices?

The power draw is the same for me. Are you sure that your undervolt is properly applied?

Indeed it does work perfectly, but it also uses more power then 17.11.4

The latest Adrenalin driver works perfectly well for RX cards. It's pointless to intentionally install older drivers.

ETHEREUM ASIC-PROOF?
In order to make this debate a little bit more organized, pipermirriam have made a GitHub poll asking whether Ethereum should be hard forked in order to render Ethereum ASICs obsolete.

https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/958

Hi, How can i get admin fee like your dev fee.
sorry for my bad english.

The E3 is NOT going to "spike" the total network hashrate for Ethereum or the other ethash coins.

It will take about 2 MILLION of those units built and operating JUST TO MATCH THE EXISTING HASHRATE.

They aren't shipping 'till mid-July timeframe.

In the almost 2 YEARS since Bitmain introduced the S9 (which was a LOT more efficient than anything else available for months, and STILL is the most efficient SHA256 miner that is shipping) they might have sold a little over ONE MILLION of them (total SHA256 network hashrate says up to 2 million, but you also have to factor in the Avalon 721/741 sales, the eBang sales, sales of whatever miners with Bitfury chips have been built, however much hashrate LW.COM has on it's internally-built miners, and at least one "smaller fry" mining operation I know of that is using their own chip).

The E3 will push network hashrate - but it's NOT going to be a "spike", there is too much EXISTING hashrate from mining rigs that are the SAME OR BETTER efficiency than the E3 announced specs.


It's a lot closer to the situation in Scrypt mining when Bitmain introduced the L3 - which STILL hasn't managed to push all "older rigs" out of profitable service if you have cheap enough electric and has a LOT of competition helping it TRY to push A2/Titan/Alcheminers out of profitability.

On Windows, I'd go with either the blockchain driver or something around 17.11 (whatever the first WQHL version is after they added "large page" support to the mainline drivers).

On LINUX, 17.50 seems a lot more stable than the blockchain drivers, but you have to modify one of the driver modules to get ANY support for undervolting or underclocking the core.