I've been mining XVG for 24hrs, started with Antmine when there's was only 33 miner and now its like 500 miners, and all throughout the 24hrs, I discovered Unimining and been jumping back and forth between the two for comparison. Never tried zpool.
So my observation, with Antmine you get bigger payment but you need to wait longer while Unimining you get payment like every 10-15mins.
I got 185mhs(ETH )and 7000mhs(XVG) on 6x rx570. And so far I got 84XVG in my wallet and I still have 13XVG in my Unimining account.
I prefer Unimining, I did not experience any problems with unimining, I've used the 5766 port and declared the c=XVG value. I'm not sure if that makes a difference.
Either way you can't go wrong, I just prefer seeing continuous payment compared to waiting for hours.
Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 430. (Read 6590718 times)
February 09, 2018, 03:33:47 PM
February 09, 2018, 03:23:10 PM
Seem unimining.net bit overloaded ?
B2S: Authorization failed
: [
21,
"Serverfull",
null
]
3-10% rejected shares. Propably due to big wave of new miners pools can't handle it . Just need some patience I think - to allocate more resources to process miners.
B2S: Authorization failed
: [
21,
"Serverfull",
null
]
3-10% rejected shares. Propably due to big wave of new miners pools can't handle it . Just need some patience I think - to allocate more resources to process miners.
antminepool 0% rejected
Confirmed, better hashrate and no rejects here. Pool Hashrate seems growing quickly
Antmine pool is now finding about 1 block/hour. Hopefully it can handle the increased stratum load.
Antmine has been good for Shield, so I am sure it will be fine for XVG. Nicehash has been hitting this pool for XSH and no problems over the last few weeks.
February 09, 2018, 02:56:50 PM
Seem unimining.net bit overloaded ?
B2S: Authorization failed
: [
21,
"Serverfull",
null
]
3-10% rejected shares. Propably due to big wave of new miners pools can't handle it . Just need some patience I think - to allocate more resources to process miners.
B2S: Authorization failed
: [
21,
"Serverfull",
null
]
3-10% rejected shares. Propably due to big wave of new miners pools can't handle it . Just need some patience I think - to allocate more resources to process miners.
antminepool 0% rejected
Confirmed, better hashrate and no rejects here. Pool Hashrate seems growing quickly
Antmine pool is now finding about 1 block/hour. Hopefully it can handle the increased stratum load.
February 09, 2018, 02:55:18 PM
I've sent out a message to Nanopool requesting that they consider offering a pool for XVG.
Nanopool would be awesome.
Nanopool would be awesome.
February 09, 2018, 02:53:14 PM
Seem unimining.net bit overloaded ?
B2S: Authorization failed
: [
21,
"Serverfull",
null
]
3-10% rejected shares. Propably due to big wave of new miners pools can't handle it . Just need some patience I think - to allocate more resources to process miners.
B2S: Authorization failed
: [
21,
"Serverfull",
null
]
3-10% rejected shares. Propably due to big wave of new miners pools can't handle it . Just need some patience I think - to allocate more resources to process miners.
antminepool 0% rejected
Confirmed, better hashrate and no rejects here. Pool Hashrate seems growing quickly
February 09, 2018, 02:49:12 PM
Ya - I'm scratching my head with Zpool and blake2s
My wallet is showing that I'm mining Shield, Ninja, verge, Blackstar when I clearly defined c=xvg in my string..
Normal?
Hopefully, a better pool will pop up cause I'm just not sure
I need a clearer definition of what this means as well
"Exclusive FlexFee™ system reduces fee's based on the pool's hashrate on select algos. Look for the green line on the hashrate graphs."
My wallet is showing that I'm mining Shield, Ninja, verge, Blackstar when I clearly defined c=xvg in my string..
Normal?
Hopefully, a better pool will pop up cause I'm just not sure
I need a clearer definition of what this means as well
"Exclusive FlexFee™ system reduces fee's based on the pool's hashrate on select algos. Look for the green line on the hashrate graphs."
February 09, 2018, 02:48:27 PM
For XVG I was on zpool for 12 hours with zero rejected shares, but they take too much and my wallet for whatever reason is set to mine all blake2s instead of just verge then autoexchange. Unimining = 10%+ rejected shares. Antminepool I've only had one rejected share so far, but hasn't been running long. Going to run for 12 hours and see the difference in currency between the two.
I have observed the same. I am more 15+ hrs with 18.5 GH/s on zpool and only got 40% of what whattomine is reporting for the hashrate. I am not sure about accuracy of whattomine on xvg-blake2s either but judging by other coins they have listed with reasonable estimate accuracy I would be suspicious on zpool.
Looking at other's response it seems,
zpool - less connectivity issues but lower payout.
Unimining - connectivity issues mainly cause of surge in mining.
Antminepool - less connectivity issue. payout is slow because it's much smaller mining pool.
Here is my report after mining XVG for over 25 hours straight on zpool with no more than 5 Rejected shares.
I have got roughly 2/3 of what whattomine says I should be getting. That's quite the cut zpool is taking!
There was one point yesterday on Zpool I noticed the "total earned" report a number, but about one hour or so later, that number was reporting about 2 or 3 XVG less than the hour earlier. That was a red flag WTF moment for me.
... Also I seem to be mining Ninja and Verge for some reason and can't figure out why. Between that and the payout fishyness, I'm going to try another pool when I have the energy to make the changes to my .bat files.
I sincerely hope that a fair and properly functioning pool for XVG comes about for us, sooner than later.
Dependin how much hash you have 25 hours might not be a big enough sample to gauge accurately but seems to line up with the zpool narrative regardless..
February 09, 2018, 02:47:38 PM
In uni pool i have 90 XVG whitin 13 hours at 15000 mhs, but now is unstable
February 09, 2018, 02:38:14 PM
For XVG I was on zpool for 12 hours with zero rejected shares, but they take too much and my wallet for whatever reason is set to mine all blake2s instead of just verge then autoexchange. Unimining = 10%+ rejected shares. Antminepool I've only had one rejected share so far, but hasn't been running long. Going to run for 12 hours and see the difference in currency between the two.
I have observed the same. I am more 15+ hrs with 18.5 GH/s on zpool and only got 40% of what whattomine is reporting for the hashrate. I am not sure about accuracy of whattomine on xvg-blake2s either but judging by other coins they have listed with reasonable estimate accuracy I would be suspicious on zpool.
Looking at other's response it seems,
zpool - less connectivity issues but lower payout.
Unimining - connectivity issues mainly cause of surge in mining.
Antminepool - less connectivity issue. payout is slow because it's much smaller mining pool.
Here is my report after mining XVG for over 25 hours straight on zpool with no more than 5 Rejected shares.
I have got roughly 2/3 of what whattomine says I should be getting. That's quite the cut zpool is taking!
There was one point yesterday on Zpool I noticed the "total earned" report a number, but about one hour or so later, that number was reporting about 2 or 3 XVG less than the hour earlier. That was a red flag WTF moment for me.
... Also I seem to be mining Ninja and Verge for some reason and can't figure out why. Between that and the payout fishyness, I'm going to try another pool when I have the energy to make the changes to my .bat files.
I sincerely hope that a fair and properly functioning pool for XVG comes about for us, sooner than later.
February 09, 2018, 02:34:44 PM
For XVG I was on zpool for 12 hours with zero rejected shares, but they take too much and my wallet for whatever reason is set to mine all blake2s instead of just verge then autoexchange. Unimining = 10%+ rejected shares. Antminepool I've only had one rejected share so far, but hasn't been running long. Going to run for 12 hours and see the difference in currency between the two.
I have observed the same. I am more 15+ hrs with 18.5 GH/s on zpool and only got 40% of what whattomine is reporting for the hashrate. I am not sure about accuracy of whattomine on xvg-blake2s either but judging by other coins they have listed with reasonable estimate accuracy I would be suspicious on zpool.
Looking at other's response it seems,
zpool - less connectivity issues but lower payout.
Unimining - connectivity issues mainly cause of surge in mining.
Antminepool - less connectivity issue. payout is slow because it's much smaller mining pool.
I'm starting to smell something a little fishy with zpool. Throwing 3.5 gh at blake2s for the last 14 hours and ya, the numbers are not adding up.. In just snooping around seems like some folks have accused them of pool theft in the past... hmmm
February 09, 2018, 02:32:38 PM
I had some gpu hangs during miner startup, seems "-gser 2" did job
February 09, 2018, 02:31:50 PM
Yes, incorrect syntax on -di parmeter: no commas between the numbers i.e: -di 012
-di 012 -cclock 1150,1150,1150 -mclock 1980,1980,1980 -cvddc 950,950,950 -mvddc 950,950,950
Still didn't work.
The commas also work, as it only selects those cards when I use those, EG; -di1,0,2 (3,4,5,6,7 - do not start)
Using AMD GPUs? If so, then check and make sure that Crossfire mode is off, that usually creates a similar issue to what you are describing.
February 09, 2018, 02:23:24 PM
For XVG I was on zpool for 12 hours with zero rejected shares, but they take too much and my wallet for whatever reason is set to mine all blake2s instead of just verge then autoexchange. Unimining = 10%+ rejected shares. Antminepool I've only had one rejected share so far, but hasn't been running long. Going to run for 12 hours and see the difference in currency between the two.
I have observed the same. I am more 15+ hrs with 18.5 GH/s on zpool and only got 40% of what whattomine is reporting for the hashrate. I am not sure about accuracy of whattomine on xvg-blake2s either but judging by other coins they have listed with reasonable estimate accuracy I would be suspicious on zpool.
Looking at other's response it seems,
zpool - less connectivity issues but lower payout.
Unimining - connectivity issues mainly cause of surge in mining.
Antminepool - less connectivity issue. payout is slow because it's much smaller mining pool.
February 09, 2018, 02:18:39 PM
I'm also experiencing high rejects and intermittent server disconnects on UniMining mining blake2s (XVG) since this morning.
I reached out to UniMining.net in their thread.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2156784.new#new
I reached out to UniMining.net in their thread.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2156784.new#new
February 09, 2018, 02:10:07 PM
For XVG I was on zpool for 12 hours with zero rejected shares, but they take too much and my wallet for whatever reason is set to mine all blake2s instead of just verge then autoexchange. Unimining = 10%+ rejected shares. Antminepool I've only had one rejected share so far, but hasn't been running long. Going to run for 12 hours and see the difference in currency between the two.
February 09, 2018, 02:08:17 PM
What clocks and voltage settings are fellow Vega64 users setting for mining ETH&blake2s?
I have only been mining Cryptonight coins with my Vega rig so far but it looks like we might now have a new contender in town...
I have only been mining Cryptonight coins with my Vega rig so far but it looks like we might now have a new contender in town...
I second that request for vega56 cards
1240 core /1100 memory with v64 bios and -dcri 45 yield 43 Mh/s + 1950 blake2s. Although I still feel mining only cryptonight is more profitable for Vega since the power consumption increases when dual mining.
Thanks a lot! Is flashing the v64 bios also advised when mining cryptonight? What's your hashrate for cryptonight? I'm at 1,8-1,9 kH with 2 vega 56.
Flashing v64 bios not really required if you plan on mining Cryptonight. I used to do 1910-1920 on stock at 1408/900-930 and similar power consumption. I am sure Vega56 can do 10w lower than v64 but I didn't want to spend time to tweak when a ppt of v64 was already available. ETH was huge boost 39 to 44 just because memory frequency was bumped.
I can not understand I started to mine XVG on nimining, I see the drop of shares on ETH.
Nobody noticed this more?
Nobody noticed this more?
I haven't. Although I am using -dcri flag of 50 or lower on RX580/RX570s.
The only problem I faced was once I start claymore and DAG gets loaded my miner used to hang and only 1 RX580 out of 6 used to show mining until eventually hanging the whole system. Turned out the default voltages/clocks was consuming lot of power with -dcri 50 (Spiked to 1600w+ Rig is a 9 GPU; 3 Nvidia + 6 AMD and perhaps I had an overdraw in my 850W psu that was powering 5 of the RX580s). Spent good 45 minutes troubleshooting this.
So I switched back to -dcri 10 and power consumption spiked to ~1500. Once OC profile from OverdriveNT is applied I increase the -dcri flag to 50. Power consumption drops to ~1350w. Need to BIOS mod with the lower voltage values to the card just to get rid of power spike when starting off the miner.
February 09, 2018, 01:58:36 PM
I can not understand I started to mine XVG on nimining, I see the drop of shares on ETH.
Nobody noticed this more?
Nobody noticed this more?
February 09, 2018, 01:41:08 PM
Unimining pool is now totaly down with XVG. Anybody has the same experience? 
looks like the have server issues, getting server full error on claymore and socket disconnect, if you leave the claymore miner it might reconnect but they need to get their severs up to the task on the ammount of traffic they are getting now.
Also anyone see difference in mining to mine to port 5766 and 5770 for XVG ? 5770 is only for XVG and the other includes other coins but than you get paid in XVG.
Any differences ?
February 09, 2018, 01:36:32 PM
Tested this. Version 9.7 works fine. Upgraded to 11.0 and my 1080 Ti works, my R280X works, but my r380 crashes immediately after allocating memory, and hashing never gets above 0.
I have the same 380 card working fine in Zcash, or older Claymore.
I have the same 380 card working fine in Zcash, or older Claymore.
February 09, 2018, 01:26:30 PM
Unimining pool is now totaly down with XVG. Anybody has the same experience?
Jump to: