10.0 -> 11.0
370 1150/1500 155 -> 169
280 1000/1500 210 -> 250
290 1000/1250 300 -> 320
Very good work with Pitcairn & Tahiti kernels Mr C!
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 234. (Read 3839163 times)
Driver 16.12.2,
10.0 -> 11.0
370 1150/1500 155 -> 169
280 1000/1500 210 -> 250
290 1000/1250 300 -> 320
Very good work with Pitcairn & Tahiti kernels Mr C!
10.0 -> 11.0
370 1150/1500 155 -> 169
280 1000/1500 210 -> 250
290 1000/1250 300 -> 320
Very good work with Pitcairn & Tahiti kernels Mr C!
will their be a speed up for the R8 380 tonga
@Claymore
The older cards are optimized well at the last update
but I dont see any improvement for the RX versions
when will we get a update for the new cards?
The older cards are optimized well at the last update
but I dont see any improvement for the RX versions
when will we get a update for the new cards?
Why would you remove support for thousands of loyal Customers? The PiMPs deserve to have Claymore, and you deserve to earn the dev fee that you get from us. Please release linux support. Thank you very much.
+1And please add more stability for Remote manager.
It is crashing some times.
v11.0
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
i am getting 398 and 401 with Fury's using version 10 with 16.11 at intensity of 6
These were my results for v10.0, intensity 8.
R9 Nano a1 350h/s
R9 Fury a2 375h/s
RX 480 a2 260h/s
All my card are stock, no mods.
Hmm, it seems I have slower Nano card, I see only 370H/s instead of 393H/s. Can you please share your Nano card details? Manufacturer, model.
Claymore, the r9 pro duos are not compatible with 15.12!!!!!!!
@Claymore
Was it not possible to make v11 and ASM compatible for 16.11.XX drivers?
I don't think many people are using the 15.12.XX drivers.
Do you think newer versions will be compatible with 16.11.XX drivers?
I have 270X and 280X. Latest 16.12.2 drivers installed. v.11 and ASM algorythm is work perfect.Was it not possible to make v11 and ASM compatible for 16.11.XX drivers?
I don't think many people are using the 15.12.XX drivers.
Do you think newer versions will be compatible with 16.11.XX drivers?
My 280X with modded bios and overclocked memory gives 290-300 H/s
R9 Nano and Fury wont work on the 16.11.5 drivers. I'll try the new 16.12 drivers and see if it works.
Just tested: R9 Nano and Fury, aka Fiji cards will not work on 16.11.5 nor 16.12.2 drivers.
R9 390 1120/1500, stock bios ~340 H/s
Thx claymore, much better than v10.
Thx claymore, much better than v10.
R 9 380 (3 CARDS) ZEC - Total Speed: 575.656 H/s, Total Shares: 16, Rejected: 0,
ZEC: GPU0 192.428 H/s, GPU1 191.068 H/s, GPU2 192.131 H/s
ZEC: GPU0 192.428 H/s, GPU1 191.068 H/s, GPU2 192.131 H/s
4 x R380 - 720H/s (180 per card).
Hi. What about Linux version 
R 9 380 (3 CARDS) ZEC - Total Speed: 575.656 H/s, Total Shares: 16, Rejected: 0,
ZEC: GPU0 192.428 H/s, GPU1 191.068 H/s, GPU2 192.131 H/s
ZEC: GPU0 192.428 H/s, GPU1 191.068 H/s, GPU2 192.131 H/s
As I said before, assembler has good speed but very bad compatibility. If you use 15.12 drivers and it does not work for you - please report, I will check these issues.
If you don't want to install 15.12 drivers - use "-asm 0" option. In next update I will add version check and display warning or set "-asm 0" automatically for incompatible drivers.
If you don't want to install 15.12 drivers - use "-asm 0" option. In next update I will add version check and display warning or set "-asm 0" automatically for incompatible drivers.
ok so the asm is no faster on 16.x drivers on 290/x i was getting 355 on 9.3 which is still fastest 4 me now on another rig with a 7970 and a 290 the 7970 starts out at 286+ hangs there for a min then slowly goes into 270 range up then down for about 1 min then after that it decrements 1 sol every sec from 270+ range till it hits 0 this is on 15.12 asm so far ver 10 with -a 1-2 does ~265 on it
14.12 drivers get the 265 15.12 have the 7970 at 260 miner v11 doesnt like 14.12 freezes pc off and on
v11.0
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
i am getting 398 and 401 with Fury's using version 10 with 16.11 at intensity of 6
These were my results for v10.0, intensity 8.
R9 Nano a1 350h/s
R9 Fury a2 375h/s
RX 480 a2 260h/s
All my card are stock, no mods.
v11.0
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
i got the same issues
my desktop with r9 290 ,fury x ,fury nano it works fine (8G memory set Virtual Memory size 16 GB)
but my miner with 6* fury nano it doesn't work (16G memory SAME set Virtual Memory size 16 GB) intensity is automatically reduce to 7
v11.0
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
i am getting 398 and 401 with Fury's using version 10 with 16.11 at intensity of 6
v11.0
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s
*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner
Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s
No Linux version planned anymore.
Why would you remove support for thousands of loyal Customers? The PiMPs deserve to have Claymore, and you deserve to earn the dev fee that you get from us. Please release linux support. Thank you very much.
I'm having issues with Fiji cards, the miner shows 0.00H/s on them while it works fine with Hawaiis.
update: seems to work okay with -asm 0, but I'm observing the exact same speeds as 10.0.
update: seems to work okay with -asm 0, but I'm observing the exact same speeds as 10.0.
@Claymore
Was it not possible to make v11 and ASM compatible for 16.11.XX drivers?
I don't think many people are using the 15.12.XX drivers.
Do you think newer versions will be compatible with 16.11.XX drivers?
I have 270X and 280X. Latest 16.12.2 drivers installed. v.11 and ASM algorythm is work perfect.Was it not possible to make v11 and ASM compatible for 16.11.XX drivers?
I don't think many people are using the 15.12.XX drivers.
Do you think newer versions will be compatible with 16.11.XX drivers?
My 280X with modded bios and overclocked memory gives 290-300 H/s
R9 Nano and Fury wont work on the 16.11.5 drivers. I'll try the new 16.12 drivers and see if it works.
Just tested: R9 Nano and Fury, aka Fiji cards will not work on 16.11.5 nor 16.12.2 drivers.
Jump to: