Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 236.

FFI2013

hero member

Activity: 906

Merit: 507

Quote from: suggsy89 on January 11, 2017, 03:04:02 PM

Quote from: FFI2013 on January 11, 2017, 02:32:32 PM

Quote from: restless on January 11, 2017, 01:49:52 PM

Someone who can explain whats wrong? Driver is 15.12

Quote

20:47:24:310   ab4   GPU #0: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 28 compute units
20:47:24:312   ab4   GPU #1: Pitcairn, 2048 MB available, 16 compute units
20:47:24:315   ab4   POOL version
20:47:24:315   ab4   b331
20:47:24:316   ab4   Platform: Windows
20:47:24:438   ab4   start building OpenCL program for GPU 0...
20:47:24:443   ab4   done
20:47:24:544   ab4   Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
20:47:24:545   ab4   16x binary failed, try 15x
20:47:24:567   ab4   start building OpenCL program for GPU 0...
20:47:29:620   ab4   done
20:47:29:864   ab4   start building OpenCL program for GPU 1...
20:47:29:871   ab4   done
20:47:29:972   ab4   Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
20:47:29:974   ab4   16x binary failed, try 15x
20:47:30:005   ab4   start building OpenCL program for GPU 1...
20:47:35:032   ab4   done
20:47:35:287   ab4   GPU #0 algorithm 2, intensity 6
20:47:35:322   ab4   GPU #1 algorithm 1, intensity 6

I have the same errors and asked twice about them I never got a response so if you figure them out could you post it please thank you

What motherboard? Do you have 16GB of virtual memory set?

I think this is a memory or driver issue.

Asus m5a97 I have virtual memory set 18gb win 10 pro 16.9.2 drivers but I have trouble installing drivers everytime I think asus has a bios update maybe I'll try that also I think Im going to reinstall fresh copy of win than put in one card install drivers than each card one by one

MCWey8

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 10

[ Poor Miner ]

maybe i have something configured wrong, but I am seeing a slight DECREASE on my rx470s .. only like 1-2 sol/s less .. but a little less

again .. might be my bad.

kotarius

sr. member

Activity: 340

Merit: 250

No linux version?

zzzzzzzzzz

full member

Activity: 150

Merit: 100

Quote from: Lucky - Luciano on January 11, 2017, 06:33:55 PM

Quote from: zzzzzzzzzz on January 11, 2017, 05:58:28 PM

Wow! That's it for v11? Those new numbers still aren't even close to Optiminer v1.3. I'm getting over 400 Sols/s on my Nanos, stock clocks, with optiminer - after the devfee.

What do you say? With Optiminer on Windows 10 I have only 262 Sol / s with SAPPHIRE RX480 8 Gb OC+ (1342 MHz GPU and 2100 MHz RAM). With Claymore 10 I have 275 Sol / s.

Is that 275 S/s after deducting CM's devfee? Did you read optiminer's README that says pointedly that the best performance for RX GPUs is on linux, for now? Anyway, we each make our own choices. For me, with all Nanos, opti-v1.3 is much faster, at this point, than CM v11.

PPOC

hero member

Activity: 575

Merit: 500

Tested v11 on 295x2, v10 had 300 per GPU, so 600-605 on the card which has 2 GPU's. V11 is getting me get 310 per GPU, so 620-625 per card. I'd say 4-5% improvement. But I had to downgrade driver to 15.12. Was running 16.11 before.

Lucky - Luciano

hero member

Activity: 711

Merit: 500

Quote from: zzzzzzzzzz on January 11, 2017, 05:58:28 PM

Wow! That's it for v11? Those new numbers still aren't even close to Optiminer v1.3. I'm getting over 400 Sols/s on my Nanos, stock clocks, with optiminer - after the devfee.

What do you say? With Optiminer on Windows 10 I have only 262 Sol / s with SAPPHIRE RX480 8 Gb OC+ (1342 MHz GPU and 2100 MHz RAM). With Claymore 10 I have 275 Sol / s.

hhdllhflower

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

fury x 410+
nano 497+
both overclock
nice job Grin

mamboOo

member

Activity: 76

Merit: 10

ASM is good for 390x. 20-30 h/s more..

jstefanop

legendary

Activity: 2188

Merit: 1401

Quote from: tkredmond on January 11, 2017, 06:22:06 PM

No difference for me.
6 RX 470 4 GB, same results with version 10

You guys read anything? He clearly mentioned increasing speed with an ASM kernel for Hawaii, Fury, Tahiti and Pitcairn cards. There was no speedup for polaris, and sounds like he's working on Polaris ASM next.

Stealth8368

sr. member

Activity: 347

Merit: 255

Fury running same speed for me as v10 as on latest drivers and all my other cards are Rx400 series, with v11 same speeds as previous v10 miner so Claymore where is the speed increases you posted of with RX series? Seems like I should have used Optiminer days ago but waited for this reported speed increases, big let down same with v10

tkredmond

newbie

Activity: 68

Merit: 0

No difference for me.
6 RX 470 4 GB, same results with version 10

gaah

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

ZEC - Total Speed: 704.949 H/s, Total Shares: 7, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 This is what i get with 2x rx 470 4gig 1x rx 480 nitro 8gig bad or good?
ZEC: GPU0 254.609 H/s, GPU1 228.714 H/s, GPU2 221.626 H/s

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: fr4nkthetank on January 11, 2017, 06:13:35 PM

ok clay, tried that, works. I have 16.11.4. guess its the drivers, I wont downgrade the drivers, maybe someone else can try, my only fury is on my main gaming computer. rest of the cards work fine other than this fury. works but speed = 360 vs 390 v10

That is definitely driver version issue, 15.12 is required currently. If you use different drivers version, miner will fail until you set "-asm 0" but in this case you will get performance of v10.

th00ber

hero member

Activity: 789

Merit: 501

Quote from: Claymore on January 11, 2017, 06:08:50 PM

Quote from: fr4nkthetank on January 11, 2017, 05:59:15 PM

yeah fury doesnt work properly. Can only do algo 1, and no asm, which results in slower speeds than v10. any other options gets 0 h/s

Use "-asm 0", miner will select "-a 3" automatically. What drivers version do you use?

Same here R9 Fury don't hash with asm 1
driver 16.30.2511

fr4nkthetank

legendary

Activity: 2294

Merit: 1182

Now the money is free, and so the people will be

ok clay, tried that, works. I have 16.11.4. guess its the drivers, I wont downgrade the drivers, maybe someone else can try, my only fury is on my main gaming computer. rest of the cards work fine other than this fury. works but speed = 360 vs 390 v10

cracker666

member

Activity: 79

Merit: 10

think ill stay with optiminer at the moment geting 200h/s with my r9 380 and its stable so if claymore can match or better it ill start using claymore again its stable with overclock at gpu 1090 mem 1585 using watman and latest amd drivers not worried about power as free

texv

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 106

For RX 4x0 V10.0 is better

Holyblood89

newbie

Activity: 38

Merit: 0

the same rate 290(290x)

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: fr4nkthetank on January 11, 2017, 05:59:15 PM

yeah fury doesnt work properly. Can only do algo 1, and no asm, which results in slower speeds than v10. any other options gets 0 h/s

Use "-asm 0", miner will select "-a 3" automatically. What drivers version do you use?

jstefanop

legendary

Activity: 2188

Merit: 1401

Quote from: zzzzzzzzzz on January 11, 2017, 05:58:28 PM

Wow! That's it for v11? Those new numbers still aren't even close to Optiminer v1.3. I'm getting over 400 Sols/s on my Nanos, stock clocks, with optiminer - after the devfee.

Seems like Tahiti is the new king card...getting 280h/s on mine with moded bios (and clock under 1ghz...could prob get over 300 if I really pushed them). Not bad for a 5 year old $90 card Wink

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 236. (Read 3839398 times)