Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 430. (Read 3839163 times)
anyone mining with r9 390? how many h/s per card? thanks
I wondered what wallet now it's safest to store zcash
Freewallet.org just had an attack/probs for an houre, i still have my coins but i'm a little bit scared now
Freewallet.org just had an attack/probs for an houre, i still have my coins but i'm a little bit scared now
Linux version will be available in 1-2 days.
what ever happened to this?
Network Hashrate increase = lower profit for miners???
Let's see if ZEC recovers but it's trending down.
Where do you get those graphs from?
They are from the silent army thread. a user over there coded them for himself to check profitability.
Network Hashrate increase = lower profit for miners???
Let's see if ZEC recovers but it's trending down.
Where do you get those graphs from?
Having an issue with the miner restarting while running under another user account. I have a mining user account that I use and then switch to another user account on the computer so it can still be used. Once and a while the driver will crash and recover, miner restarts as it should but it then it gets to where it is supposed to get work from the pool and stops until you log back into the account.
Any fixes for this other than building a dedicated rig that doesn't get used for anything else?
I'm not using 15.12 anymore, I wonder if that's causing this? I remember this working properly before..
Any fixes for this other than building a dedicated rig that doesn't get used for anything else?
I'm not using 15.12 anymore, I wonder if that's causing this? I remember this working properly before..
when can you release the v9 version ?
Claymore said it would take a couple of days to release the next version as it will take more effort to get more speed.
when can you release the v9 version ?
Earning a little less everyday, added a brand new RX 480 8 GB $249 . Payrate jumped up for about 30 minutes now it is lower than before I added the new card. Went from 1kH/s to 1.2kH/s but now earning less. Is it just down hill from here?
with the slow start now being over I think more people will be switching over. It was mentioned yesterday I believe that the DAG for ETH has got too big now for those using 2GB cards so they will be now moving across to the next most profitable which I do believe is ZEC.
Network Hashrate increase = lower profit for miners???
Don't worry, think long term and don't cash your coins now. Once the Z address problem is fixed zcash will be the primary coin for ransomware and other black market transactions. Think of drug money beeing transferred to south america. Soon zcash will make a run at bitcoin
Network Hashrate increase = lower profit for miners???
Let's see if ZEC recovers but it's trending down.
Hello Claymore,
Thank you first for your miner.
I am having a bit of a difficulty setting up fan speed.
6 Cards in total:
In config.txt I set this:
Is there something wrong I did?
Thank you.
Thank you first for your miner.
I am having a bit of a difficulty setting up fan speed.
6 Cards in total:
Quote
GPU #0: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
In config.txt I set this:
Quote
-fanmin 50,50,45,45,45,45
-tt 75
-ttli 85
-tstop 90
-i 0
And I get this:-tt 75
-ttli 85
-tstop 90
-i 0
Quote
GPU0 t=59C fan=50%, GPU1 t=50C fan=50%, GPU2 t=57C fan=60%, GPU3 t=53C fan=58%, GPU4 t=54C fan=58%, GPU5 t=53C fan=59%
Is there something wrong I did?
Thank you.
Bus width is only part of the equation. Bandwidth is a better representation.
RX480 vs R9 390 vs R9 Fury
Frequency: 2000 MHz 6000 MHz 500 MHz
Interface: 256-bit 512-bit 4096-bit
Bandwidth: 256 GB/s 384 GB/s 512 GB/s
Being that equihash is specifically designed to bottleneck on bandwidth I wouldn't hold my breath for major increases on the RX series...
RX480 vs R9 390 vs R9 Fury
Frequency: 2000 MHz 6000 MHz 500 MHz
Interface: 256-bit 512-bit 4096-bit
Bandwidth: 256 GB/s 384 GB/s 512 GB/s
Being that equihash is specifically designed to bottleneck on bandwidth I wouldn't hold my breath for major increases on the RX series...
Setting memclk to 1100 instead 2100 on RX 480 causes only 20% hashrate drop.
Bandwidth is not a boottleneck at all.
Zcash is not like bandwidth-hungry ETH. There's no 100% memory controller load.
Earning a little less everyday, added a brand new RX 480 8 GB $249 . Payrate jumped up for about 30 minutes now it is lower than before I added the new card. Went from 1kH/s to 1.2kH/s but now earning less. Is it just down hill from here?
with the slow start now being over I think more people will be switching over. It was mentioned yesterday I believe that the DAG for ETH has got too big now for those using 2GB cards so they will be now moving across to the next most profitable which I do believe is ZEC.
Network Hashrate increase = lower profit for miners???
The higher the hashrate the more mining power is being aimed at that coin. This will in turn increase the difficulty which will mean less income.
Transistors rx480-5,700 million vs 390x-6,200 million
Bus Width 256 bit vs 512 bit
so your 480 is approximately equal to the 280x and will never reach the level of 390
Bus Width 256 bit vs 512 bit
so your 480 is approximately equal to the 280x and will never reach the level of 390
So what ?
Pitcairn have 256 bit bus too, but only 100-120 H/s
Fiji have 4096 bit bus, but it does even less than Havaii.
Bus width is only part of the equation. Bandwidth is a better representation.
RX480 vs R9 390 vs R9 Fury
Frequency: 2000 MHz 6000 MHz 500 MHz
Interface: 256-bit 512-bit 4096-bit
Bandwidth: 256 GB/s 384 GB/s 512 GB/s
Being that equihash is specifically designed to bottleneck on bandwidth I wouldn't hold my breath for major increases on the RX series...
Earning a little less everyday, added a brand new RX 480 8 GB $249 . Payrate jumped up for about 30 minutes now it is lower than before I added the new card. Went from 1kH/s to 1.2kH/s but now earning less. Is it just down hill from here?
with the slow start now being over I think more people will be switching over. It was mentioned yesterday I believe that the DAG for ETH has got too big now for those using 2GB cards so they will be now moving across to the next most profitable which I do believe is ZEC.
Network Hashrate increase = lower profit for miners???
Earning a little less everyday, added a brand new RX 480 8 GB $249 . Payrate jumped up for about 30 minutes now it is lower than before I added the new card. Went from 1kH/s to 1.2kH/s but now earning less. Is it just down hill from here?
with the slow start now being over I think more people will be switching over. It was mentioned yesterday I believe that the DAG for ETH has got too big now for those using 2GB cards so they will be now moving across to the next most profitable which I do believe is ZEC.
Earning a little less everyday, added a brand new RX 480 8 GB $249 . Payrate jumped up for about 30 minutes now it is lower than before I added the new card. Went from 1kH/s to 1.2kH/s but now earning less. Is it just down hill from here?
Transistors rx480-5,700 million vs 390x-6,200 million
Bus Width 256 bit vs 512 bit
so your 480 is approximately equal to the 280x and will never reach the level of 390
Bus Width 256 bit vs 512 bit
so your 480 is approximately equal to the 280x and will never reach the level of 390
So what ?
Pitcairn have 256 bit bus too, but only 100-120 H/s
Fiji have 4096 bit bus, but it does even less than Havaii.
Bus width is only part of the equation. Bandwidth is a better representation.
RX480 vs R9 390 vs R9 Fury
Frequency: 2000 MHz 6000 MHz 500 MHz
Interface: 256-bit 512-bit 4096-bit
Bandwidth: 256 GB/s 384 GB/s 512 GB/s
Being that equihash is specifically designed to bottleneck on bandwidth I wouldn't hold my breath for major increases on the RX series...
guys, need some guidance to setup the nicehash zcash mining with BTC payouts.
Kinda confused, claymore works with it or not?
I have to give there dual adresses, like zcash adres and as worker BTC adress?
Or i have to dowload theyr nicehash miner and use the BTC adress?
Sorry for disturbing...
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool stratum+tcp://equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -wal 1EMPUNuKhgxqoqxxu1D18sKvrcqW36bpXH -psw x -i 6Kinda confused, claymore works with it or not?
I have to give there dual adresses, like zcash adres and as worker BTC adress?
Or i have to dowload theyr nicehash miner and use the BTC adress?
Sorry for disturbing...
edit epools txt with POOL: zpool stratum+tcp://equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357, WALLET: 1EMPUNuKhgxqoqxxu1D18sKvrcqW36bpXH, PSW: x, ALLPOOLS: 1
thats my wallet address by the way so change it to yours
nicehash miner also now includes claymores miner runs about the same speed so use either
thank you very much, working for now... lets see what it brings....
In case you guys want to save some fees, i've got a Pink Motorboat 0% fee special on https://zec.suprnova.cc
BTW is there a Linux version yet ?
BTW is there a Linux version yet ?
This site can’t be reached
zec.suprnova.cc refused to connect.
Try:
Checking the connection
Checking the proxy and the firewall
ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED
Works fine here.. https://zec.suprnova.cc
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/zec.suprnova.cc
Works
Weird, for some reason I keep getting that error and can't connect.
https://xzc.suprnova.cc/ seems to work however.
Jump to: