280x is better to, 384bits
My 280x and 480 have about the same speed on ZEC, but the 480 uses much less power. So figure out yourself which is more profitable.
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 434. (Read 3839163 times)
My 280x and 480 have about the same speed on ZEC, but the 480 uses much less power. So figure out yourself which is more profitable.
Transistors rx480-5,700 million vs 390x-6,200 million
Bus Width 256 bit vs 512 bit
so your 480 is approximately equal to the 280x and will never reach the level of 390
Bus Width 256 bit vs 512 bit
so your 480 is approximately equal to the 280x and will never reach the level of 390
280x is better to, 384bits
Transistors rx480-5,700 million vs 390x-6,200 million
Bus Width 256 bit vs 512 bit
so your 480 is approximately equal to the 280x and will never reach the level of 390
Bus Width 256 bit vs 512 bit
so your 480 is approximately equal to the 280x and will never reach the level of 390
I think so. If you undervolt the R9 390(x), you will get similar efficiency as the RX 480. You have to reduce the frequency below 950 MHz.
Transistors rx480-5,700 million vs 390x-6,200 million
Bus Width 256 bit vs 512 bit
so your 480 is approximately equal to the 280x and will never reach the level of 390
Bus Width 256 bit vs 512 bit
so your 480 is approximately equal to the 280x and will never reach the level of 390
We just hit and crossed 20,000 blocks so we should know be getting the full emission rate of 12.5 ZEC per block.
This should hopefully reflect in the mining rewards
after that DEV reward of Zcash is 0% This should hopefully reflect in the mining rewards
I thougt 20% dev reward is until first halvening in 4 years?
Yes. That is right.
Claymore Please let's nexw update be more RX friendly 
really please
really please Same here! Don't let these private pools get away with all the fish!
To those complaining about Dwarfpool payment scheme:
HBPPS and PPLNS are done to prevent poolhopping (switching pools base on how long they have been mining current round, increasing your own profits). This is trivial task to automate.
If they don't limit poolhopping, it is worse for you anyway, guaranteed. If they do prevent it, it is possibly bad for you certain hours, but it would also be bad if they did straight proportional. If it takes them 4 hours to find a block (bad luck), when it on average would take them 1, you are getting 1/4 avg profit, which is less than you would want anyway.
With HBPPS or PPLNS, you get better returns long run, since pool hoppers don't profit. If it is a small pool, there is more variance, but this will be the case with other schemes as well. Straight PPS pools have higher fee due to higher risk. Mining is about the longterm, so even if pool only finds 3 blocks per day, over the period of like a week or a month, it will average out, some days they find 8, some they find 1.
HBPPS and PPLNS are done to prevent poolhopping (switching pools base on how long they have been mining current round, increasing your own profits). This is trivial task to automate.
If they don't limit poolhopping, it is worse for you anyway, guaranteed. If they do prevent it, it is possibly bad for you certain hours, but it would also be bad if they did straight proportional. If it takes them 4 hours to find a block (bad luck), when it on average would take them 1, you are getting 1/4 avg profit, which is less than you would want anyway.
With HBPPS or PPLNS, you get better returns long run, since pool hoppers don't profit. If it is a small pool, there is more variance, but this will be the case with other schemes as well. Straight PPS pools have higher fee due to higher risk. Mining is about the longterm, so even if pool only finds 3 blocks per day, over the period of like a week or a month, it will average out, some days they find 8, some they find 1.
I dusted my old 7770 and put to work along with my 480 for an extra 57. Now thinking of placing the even older 6950. Anyone has any performance numbers? These cards have been paid many times over so as long as they generate revenue above electrical cost they are worth putting them back to work. Tia
HI
HD6930 1GB get 6 h/s only, it 50 times less by 390, it so small, but on XMR get 170 h/s, 4 times less 390, it normal
HD6930 1GB get 6 h/s only, it 50 times less by 390, it so small, but on XMR get 170 h/s, 4 times less 390, it normal
Did we reached the limit of 280x?
Is there still headway for the rx 470/480?
It wouldnbe great if these questions will be answered so we can invest on that gpu
Is there still headway for the rx 470/480?
It wouldnbe great if these questions will be answered so we can invest on that gpu
We just hit and crossed 20,000 blocks so we should know be getting the full emission rate of 12.5 ZEC per block.
This should hopefully reflect in the mining rewards
https://i.imgsafe.org/031f0694af.jpg
after that DEV reward of Zcash is 0% This should hopefully reflect in the mining rewards
https://i.imgsafe.org/031f0694af.jpg
I thougt 20% dev reward is until first halvening in 4 years?
Claymore Please let's nexw update be more RX friendly really please
really please We just hit and crossed 20,000 blocks so we should know be getting the full emission rate of 12.5 ZEC per block.
This should hopefully reflect in the mining rewards
after that DEV reward of Zcash is 0% This should hopefully reflect in the mining rewards
If I remember correctly for the next four years 20% of each block is given to the devs to be shared among them and the investors.
We just hit and crossed 20,000 blocks so we should know be getting the full emission rate of 12.5 ZEC per block.
This should hopefully reflect in the mining rewards
after that DEV reward of Zcash is 0% This should hopefully reflect in the mining rewards
We just hit and crossed 20,000 blocks so we should know be getting the full emission rate of 12.5 ZEC per block.
This should hopefully reflect in the mining rewards
https://i.imgsafe.org/031f0694af.jpg
This should hopefully reflect in the mining rewards
https://i.imgsafe.org/031f0694af.jpg
Please, tell me this site)
Lol even claymore said it ^^
stupid 20% fee ^
total fees could be as high as 23.5%Has anyone done any statistical analysis between Flypool and Dwarfpool?
stupid 20% fee ^
total fees could be as high as 23.5%
stupid 20% fee ^
Jump to: