Pages:
Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 50. (Read 3839203 times)

rpg
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
I think my 7950 mine better than RX 480.

As summer heats up in the southwest desert (120f 50c) I'm selling my army of 7950 on eBay. Selling one now - the best at 320 sols at 1190/1497) and the other 4 will follow. Will keep the 2 fury and one 480. Or maybe sell the fury. They cost me $150 each new and can get at least $350 each

Radeon 7950 going for $350 each on eBay? Crazy!

No fury
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
can somebody tell me how to configure the start.bat file?

because i am using slushpool, and want to mine zcash bitte!

hopefully somebody can help me out here..
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
I think my 7950 mine better than RX 480.

As summer heats up in the southwest desert (120f 50c) I'm selling my army of 7950 on eBay. Selling one now - the best at 320 sols at 1190/1497) and the other 4 will follow. Will keep the 2 fury and one 480. Or maybe sell the fury. They cost me $150 each new and can get at least $350 each

Radeon 7950 going for $350 each on eBay? Crazy!
newbie
Activity: 71
Merit: 0
what is the hashrate of RX570 and RX580?

They are about 300H/s.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
what is the hashrate of RX570 and RX580?
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1657
ok so what is the best way to dual mine ZEC & x pair with NVIDIA, does Claymore support this, or is there a better alternative ?

Is anyone actually getting good results with ZEC / DCR on Nvidia, or ZEC / anything ?..
rpg
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
I think my 7950 mine better than RX 480.

As summer heats up in the southwest desert (120f 50c) I'm selling my army of 7950 on eBay. Selling one now - the best at 320 sols at 1190/1497) and the other 4 will follow. Will keep the 2 fury and one 480. Or maybe sell the fury. They cost me $150 each new and can get at least $350 each
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Mining long on dev fee... normal?

DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'zec-eu1.nanopool.org' <185.71.66.31> port 6666
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666)
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:03:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=30%, GPU1 t=70C fan=30%, GPU2 t=68C fan=30%, GPU3 t=65C fan=30%, GPU4 t=51C fan=30%
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:04:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:04:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:04:24 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:04:33 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:04:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=30%, GPU1 t=70C fan=30%, GPU2 t=68C fan=30%, GPU3 t=65C fan=30%, GPU4 t=51C fan=30%
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:04:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'eu1-zcash.flypool.org' <94.23.60.113> port 3333
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333)
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:05:11 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=30%, GPU1 t=70C fan=30%, GPU2 t=68C fan=30%, GPU3 t=65C fan=30%, GPU4 t=50C fan=30%
ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:05:16 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:05:22 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:05:24 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:05:24 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:05:35 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'eu1-zcash.flypool.org' <45.63.119.177> port 3333
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333)
GPU0 t=68C fan=30%, GPU1 t=70C fan=30%, GPU2 t=68C fan=30%, GPU3 t=65C fan=30%, GPU4 t=50C fan=30%
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:05:55 - New job from zec.suprnova.cc:2142
ZEC - Total Speed: 217.032 H/s, Total Shares: 1460, Rejected: 0, Time: 03:20
ZEC: GPU0 40.904 H/s, GPU1 41.825 H/s, GPU2 44.806 H/s, GPU3 43.733 H/s, GPU4 45.764 H/s
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:05:59 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:06:11 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=30%, GPU1 t=70C fan=30%, GPU2 t=68C fan=30%, GPU3 t=65C fan=30%, GPU4 t=51C fan=30%
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:06:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'eu1-zcash.flypool.org' <45.63.119.177> port 3333
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333)
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:06:26 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:06:40 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=69C fan=30%, GPU1 t=70C fan=30%, GPU2 t=68C fan=30%, GPU3 t=65C fan=30%, GPU4 t=51C fan=30%
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:06:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:07:03 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:07:03 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:07:05 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:07:05 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:07:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=69C fan=30%, GPU1 t=68C fan=60%, GPU2 t=69C fan=30%, GPU3 t=65C fan=30%, GPU4 t=51C fan=30%
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'zec-eu1.nanopool.org' <185.71.66.31> port 6666
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666)
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:07:22 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:07:22 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:07:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:07:31 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=69C fan=30%, GPU1 t=67C fan=30%, GPU2 t=68C fan=30%, GPU3 t=65C fan=30%, GPU4 t=50C fan=30%
ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:08:00 - New job from zec.suprnova.cc:2142
ZEC - Total Speed: 216.748 H/s, Total Shares: 1475, Rejected: 0, Time: 03:22
ZEC: GPU0 44.842 H/s, GPU1 44.374 H/s, GPU2 42.326 H/s, GPU3 43.446 H/s, GPU4 41.759 H/s
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:08:09 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:08:14 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'eu1-zcash.flypool.org' <94.23.60.113> port 3333
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333)
ZEC: 11/04/16-21:08:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!

and still on
hero member
Activity: 525
Merit: 500
Hey I am looking for GPU for Mining, Electricty play no role

Which GPU's that are still available that have maybe more Power Costs than others are considerable?

Thanks for advices.

Greetings



280X/290/290X/390 etc
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Hey I am looking for GPU for Mining, Electricty play no role

Which GPU's that are still available that have maybe more Power Costs than others are considerable?

Thanks for advices.

Greetings

full member
Activity: 191
Merit: 100
I think my 7950 mine better than RX 480.

But 7950 uses more energy.
newbie
Activity: 95
Merit: 0
When I do -i 6 on my 7950's, it says there is not enough ram and it reduces it to 5! What SOL/s are you getting on your 7950s?
Well I have managed about 260 (-i 5) at 950/1450/1.05v, last claymore zec miner.

Hi i did the same for my R9 280 and it worked! thanks a lot it saved me some energy
legendary
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
Please could somebody help me work out how to get the most out of my R9 380s.

I used to mine ZEC using a GTX950 and got 165 sol/s. I then bought an R9 380 and with using the Claymore Zcash AMD GPU miner I got an extra 210 sol/s. I then bought a second R9 380 and swapped out the GTX950.
Initially I was getting 210 sol/s on each card but my mining pool report said I was hashing at 0 sol/s. I left it for a few hours and still nothing, despite the miner seeming to be working OK.

I restarted the miner and now I get 175 sol/s from one card and 20 sol/s from the other. I dont understand whats happening. Do I need to run two instances of the miner or change some settings? I have played with the intensity. I havent put it above 6 yet but if I lower the intensity the hash rate goes down.

Please help! I was hoping to mine at over 400 sol/s but at the moment i'm getting 200 sol/s from two R9 380s!



I think you need to use the 15.12 driver.

not much to do i run 16.x drivers   , the 380 is not good on zec  it s just a bit faster than the 270 , 270 does 185sol and 380 does 205 to 225 (depend what model you have)
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 606
my 7850 is doing 160 h/s @ 1100 core and 1300 memory i  think its rather high


My Powercolor HD 7850 does 195 -198 H/s on ZEC. Core clock 1240 Memory clock 1500.
full member
Activity: 232
Merit: 100
I think my 7950 mine better than RX 480.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Hi!

Well, I think there's no point in going into too much detail with this all configurations, as there are so many parameters and the values (the actual coin exchange, network hashrate, tdp and electricity costs, etc.) are so variable that is almost impossible to be accurate and useful... The best aproach, I think, is to resume the main cards into a table like this one:

http://proudminers.com/tools.html#performance

Simple enough to understand, and quite realistic, don't you think?

Regards.
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
When I bought my first R9 380 I tried the 15.12 driver and it yielded the same as the most recent driver. I'll try it again and report back.

EDIT: Yup, for one card the driver version made no difference... for two, the 15.12 driver now gives 210sol/s on each card and reports temps and fan utilisation for both cards (it only did it for GPU 0 last time). I should have re-read the instructions!

Thank you!
newbie
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
Please could somebody help me work out how to get the most out of my R9 380s.

I used to mine ZEC using a GTX950 and got 165 sol/s. I then bought an R9 380 and with using the Claymore Zcash AMD GPU miner I got an extra 210 sol/s. I then bought a second R9 380 and swapped out the GTX950.
Initially I was getting 210 sol/s on each card but my mining pool report said I was hashing at 0 sol/s. I left it for a few hours and still nothing, despite the miner seeming to be working OK.

I restarted the miner and now I get 175 sol/s from one card and 20 sol/s from the other. I dont understand whats happening. Do I need to run two instances of the miner or change some settings? I have played with the intensity. I havent put it above 6 yet but if I lower the intensity the hash rate goes down.

Please help! I was hoping to mine at over 400 sol/s but at the moment i'm getting 200 sol/s from two R9 380s!



I think you need to use the 15.12 driver.
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
Please could somebody help me work out how to get the most out of my R9 380s.

I used to mine ZEC using a GTX950 and got 165 sol/s. I then bought an R9 380 and with using the Claymore Zcash AMD GPU miner I got an extra 210 sol/s. I then bought a second R9 380 and swapped out the GTX950.
Initially I was getting 210 sol/s on each card but my mining pool report said I was hashing at 0 sol/s. I left it for a few hours and still nothing, despite the miner seeming to be working OK.

I restarted the miner and now I get 175 sol/s from one card and 20 sol/s from the other. I dont understand whats happening. Do I need to run two instances of the miner or change some settings? I have played with the intensity. I havent put it above 6 yet but if I lower the intensity the hash rate goes down.

Please help! I was hoping to mine at over 400 sol/s but at the moment i'm getting 200 sol/s from two R9 380s!

legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
ZEC is reliant on a lot more than just the memory bandwidth, otherwise the GTX 1070 would NOT be quite a bit faster than the RX 480/580 8GB cards (that have the SAME bus width and memory speed).

ETH on the other hand is VERY reliant on memory bandwidth AND low memory latency, which is why the old R9 290 is still one of the best ETH miner cards in existence despite having rather low clocks on memory and core (but has a very WIDE memory interface) - and it's also why the HBM based cards don't do anywhere near as well as their memory bandwidth says they should, HBM has high latency compared to GDDR.

 I dunno where "stream processors" is from - even AMD doesn't use the Stream interface any more since they got in behind and started pushing OpenCL.
 Perhaps that was supposed to be "cores" or "shaders"?


 Process is not directly a factor, though it's a major INdirect factor that affects power efficiency and clock rates and how many cores you can fit on a chip without overheating.
 Pixel pipelines do not matter at all.
 Memory capacity does not matter at all (except for ETH and spinoffs that use a DAG file, as the entire DAG file has to fit into the ram on the GPU so you need "just enough" more doesn't help).

Pages:
Jump to: