Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 53.

Yatsida

newbie

Activity: 67

Merit: 0

Quote from: oldisoft on June 09, 2017, 11:20:34 PM

Quote from: Jake_Shake on June 09, 2017, 11:16:12 AM

Hash rate jumped on zec. Guess miners aren't liking the zentrash/zclassic replay attack. Don't forget to bring your hardfork to dinner if you're still mining that crap.

Btw 12.5 been solid some release. 280x and nano. Thank up claymore.

sorry, do any miners have to do for hardfork? any vote? or missed smth?

Cheers

I think the 12.5 is as solid as the 12.4.

smitushka

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

Quote from: 1234xm on June 09, 2017, 06:27:02 PM

i have new mobo, asrock h270 fatality performance. I cannot start more than one GPU. only main slot (16x with monitor) is working. bios not recognized other 3 card.
what can i do? it is very frustating... Sad

i did updated bios. After update, i enable 4g decoding, also i saw to change speed ling to gen 1...and so on...nothing helped.

any idea?

Reinstall your windows in UEFI, not BIOS. Set mobo to default. Set your 4 cards. Enjoy.

oldisoft

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

https://iota.org/

Quote from: Jake_Shake on June 09, 2017, 11:16:12 AM

Hash rate jumped on zec. Guess miners aren't liking the zentrash/zclassic replay attack. Don't forget to bring your hardfork to dinner if you're still mining that crap.

Btw 12.5 been solid some release. 280x and nano. Thank up claymore.

sorry, do any miners have to do for hardfork? any vote? or missed smth?

Cheers

1234xm

member

Activity: 75

Merit: 10

i have new mobo, asrock h270 fatality performance. I cannot start more than one GPU. only main slot (16x with monitor) is working. bios not recognized other 3 card.
what can i do? it is very frustating... Sad

i did updated bios. After update, i enable 4g decoding, also i saw to change speed ling to gen 1...and so on...nothing helped.

any idea?

hurr1cane

full member

Activity: 235

Merit: 100

hi all best pool for zec is http://zcash.flypool.org/ -----ignore the rest-----

ive tried some pools and the best payout zec mining pool ive come across is flypool, ignore the rest use flypool. I use the US1 server because it has the lowest ping.
I wasn't satisfied with f2pool the fee is too high,

if you use the encrypt feature on claymore zec miner, then claymores fee is lower then non-encrypted , read the text file in claymores folder

Go Tongue

http://zcash.flypool.org/ Tongue

CHUCK NORRIS DOESNT DO PUSHUPS HE PUSHES THE EARTH DOWN Shocked

majorlee

full member

Activity: 134

Merit: 100

First DJ to play gigs for Bitcoin & Crypto Guru

what is best 1080Ti Card to use now?

AKRO

member

Activity: 83

Merit: 10

Just for kicks, does anyone know what an APU would do? like an A10-7850k or A8-7670k?

Jake_Shake

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Hash rate jumped on zec. Guess miners aren't liking the zentrash/zclassic replay attack. Don't forget to bring your hardfork to dinner if you're still mining that crap.

Btw 12.5 been solid some release. 280x and nano. Thank up claymore.

dumada

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: Vaslime on June 09, 2017, 07:31:55 AM

Quote from: maxpowerzz92 on June 08, 2017, 02:41:56 PM

New release seems to be working fine for me. Not getting much of a performance improvement but stability seems fine for my rigs. Running R9 290 and 290x's.

edit: NVM wrong thread. My 280x's are using this version for ZEC mining. Stability is fine also.

Do you mean there is some speed improvement?

I compared 12.4 and 12.5, there is no difference.

Vaslime

member

Activity: 141

Merit: 10

Cryptotalk.org

Quote from: maxpowerzz92 on June 08, 2017, 02:41:56 PM

New release seems to be working fine for me. Not getting much of a performance improvement but stability seems fine for my rigs. Running R9 290 and 290x's.

edit: NVM wrong thread. My 280x's are using this version for ZEC mining. Stability is fine also.

Do you mean there is some speed improvement?

maxpowerzz92

sr. member

Activity: 249

Merit: 250

New release seems to be working fine for me. Not getting much of a performance improvement but stability seems fine for my rigs. Running R9 290 and 290x's.

edit: NVM wrong thread. My 280x's are using this version for ZEC mining. Stability is fine also.

huynhdat1989

member

Activity: 101

Merit: 10

Dear,

All my rigs got the error:
Unhandled signal in divisionErrorHandler()
So all my rig is stopped hashing. Could you please tell me what is wrong with the rigs?

Regards,

Stanko25

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Hi, I have a card I've been scrambling with Gigabyte R9 280 3GB.
I had 280 H/s constantly for a month ... now I was hit 160 H/s.
Temp and Fan have fallen for a couple of degrees...
As if the card does not give 100%
What happened Huh

delle54

sr. member

Activity: 307

Merit: 250

Quote from: zehyr on June 07, 2017, 12:55:20 PM

Does anyone knows why Claymore 9.4 shows statistics randomly (as I see) somehow without pressing "S" button?

Wrong thread.

jddebug

sr. member

Activity: 446

Merit: 250

I was having the same issue but updating all my rigs to 12.5 fixed it and no more rejects on Nicehash. Before on 12.4 there were MANY rejects.

Quote from: Claymore on June 06, 2017, 03:47:58 PM

Quote from: fredeq on June 06, 2017, 03:44:06 PM

Quote from: Valgar on June 06, 2017, 03:26:48 PM

I'm getting a lot of issues with the Claymore miner within NiceHash in the past week, anyone else getting this?

This happens on 3 separate rigs running different cards, Furys, 280 and 390.

What often happens is periods of rejected shares even though the cards are rock solid stable and periods of disconnects/timeouts, I've tried switching regions but the same issue. If I switch miners I get no issues, but of course Claymore is the best performing.

Getting the same.
My idea is there is a new coin out there that is not properly supported by CM miner, hence the rejects.
Hush? Zencash?

Please PM me the log file so I can check the reason.

smaxz

sr. member

Activity: 430

Merit: 253

VeganAcademy

Quote from: blksith0 on June 07, 2017, 02:01:28 PM

Haha! I would much rather I lose 2.5% of my income rather than involuntarily give you 2% of it Kiss

I think there's a psych study done showing how people usually distribute money in a situation like that.

there are also considerations like closed source software vs open source which one may audit themselves.

may be useful to look up the definitions of "Claymore" (:

blksith0

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

Haha! I would much rather I lose 2.5% of my income rather than involuntarily give you 2% of it Kiss

I think there's a psych study done showing how people usually distribute money in a situation like that.

zehyr

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Quote from: th00ber on June 07, 2017, 10:06:24 AM

Quote from: Hallmader on June 07, 2017, 07:19:22 AM

Quote from: ramor14 on June 07, 2017, 04:52:50 AM

Hi everyone,

I've few rigs using Claymore miner (9.4 , windows 10, crimson 16.9.1), I observed both stability and performances are much higher when only one GPU (GB rx 470 4g) is plugged on the rig. I achieved to get 27mhs/500mhs (eth/sc) with one gpu over hours, then I decided to keep these settings which seemed stable enough for the whole rig. However the performances of the 6 gpus are actually much lower, around 22mhs/300mhs per gpu, and the rig crashes often (wattman error). Is there something I can do to fix this issue?

Thanks

I do not see difference with multiple GPU. So you may reduce the frequnecy to make them more stable.

How is your CPU ?
Maybe it is at 100% handling all the GPU mining

CPU is not a matter. Power draw is not enough or drivers messed up.

zehyr

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Does anyone knows why Claymore 9.4 shows statistics randomly (as I see) somehow without pressing "S" button?

th00ber

hero member

Activity: 789

Merit: 501

Quote from: Hallmader on June 07, 2017, 07:19:22 AM

Quote from: ramor14 on June 07, 2017, 04:52:50 AM

Hi everyone,

I've few rigs using Claymore miner (9.4 , windows 10, crimson 16.9.1), I observed both stability and performances are much higher when only one GPU (GB rx 470 4g) is plugged on the rig. I achieved to get 27mhs/500mhs (eth/sc) with one gpu over hours, then I decided to keep these settings which seemed stable enough for the whole rig. However the performances of the 6 gpus are actually much lower, around 22mhs/300mhs per gpu, and the rig crashes often (wattman error). Is there something I can do to fix this issue?

Thanks

I do not see difference with multiple GPU. So you may reduce the frequnecy to make them more stable.

How is your CPU ?
Maybe it is at 100% handling all the GPU mining

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 53. (Read 3839203 times)