0nm
I win.
Topic: [CLOSED] BOUNTY: BFL SC die size (20BTC) and process node (20BTC) - page 3. (Read 8723 times)
October 25, 2012, 10:06:08 PM
October 25, 2012, 09:57:37 PM
Maybe 45nm? That could be why Josh sees these as penultimate without room for much improvement.
There is ALWAYS room for improvement, if not we would all still be living in caves eating rocks.
October 24, 2012, 11:07:57 PM
Lol - Does this qualify as a "Booty call"? 
Damn, my plans to collect the booty are foiled!
45%... do I hear 40%?
45%... do I hear 40%?
October 24, 2012, 08:38:19 PM
Damn, my plans to collect the booty are foiled!
45%... do I hear 40%?
45%... do I hear 40%?
October 24, 2012, 08:33:44 PM
Inaba, you cannot get paid for that, because...
It was very craftily formulated to not let you earn a single satoshi.
Both of these bounties become null and void if BFL releases the figures themselves.
It was very craftily formulated to not let you earn a single satoshi.
He is Inaba, not BFL_Josh.
October 24, 2012, 08:15:13 PM
Inaba, you cannot get paid for that, because...
Both of these bounties become null and void if BFL releases the figures themselves.
It was very craftily formulated to not let you earn a single satoshi. If Inaba tells me the figures but not in public then I can collect. I'll only charge 50%, how about it Inaba?
I'll undercut at 45%
Nice .....LOL
October 24, 2012, 08:05:54 PM
Damn, my plans to collect the booty are foiled!
45%... do I hear 40%?
45%... do I hear 40%?
October 24, 2012, 07:47:12 PM
Inaba, you cannot get paid for that, because...
Both of these bounties become null and void if BFL releases the figures themselves.
It was very craftily formulated to not let you earn a single satoshi. If Inaba tells me the figures but not in public then I can collect. I'll only charge 50%, how about it Inaba?
I'll undercut at 45%
October 24, 2012, 07:00:58 PM
Inaba, you cannot get paid for that, because...
Both of these bounties become null and void if BFL releases the figures themselves.
It was very craftily formulated to not let you earn a single satoshi. If Inaba tells me the figures but not in public then I can collect. I'll only charge 50%, how about it Inaba?
October 24, 2012, 06:48:33 PM
Inaba, you cannot get paid for that, because...
It was very craftily formulated to not let you earn a single satoshi.
Both of these bounties become null and void if BFL releases the figures themselves.
It was very craftily formulated to not let you earn a single satoshi.
October 24, 2012, 06:08:51 PM
Smart thinking.
I believe you are right about this, after reading BFL posts.
45 is still too expensive, even AMD is stuck at 32.
Only Intel is capable to do 22 at the moment
October 24, 2012, 05:53:54 PM
I'll tell for 40 BTC! Do I hear 50?
October 24, 2012, 01:18:11 PM
28nm! I want bounty for random guessing!
October 24, 2012, 07:47:35 AM
Maybe 45nm? That could be why Josh sees these as penultimate without room for much improvement.
October 24, 2012, 06:44:18 AM
Probably 90nm. Seems to be the most cost effective.
Prepare for the improbable.
May the force be with you.
October 24, 2012, 06:06:09 AM
Probably 90nm. Seems to be the most cost effective.
Prepare for the improbable.
October 23, 2012, 10:44:58 PM
I will offer a 20BTC bounty to anybody who posts a measurement of the size of the die used in BFL's "SC" devices. I'm assuming they all use the same chip. It's really easy to get the die measurement from a broken device -- just grind off the plastic/ceramic top using a dremel and pull out a ruler. I will be happy to escrow the bounty with a well-known forum member if you can present credible evidence that you're serious about this -- that way you can be sure you'll get paid before you totally wreck your already-broken device.
I need this figure in order to compute the η-factor for their product.
I will also offer a 20BTC bounty for knowledge of which process node BFL is using. However, I caution in advance that it's not as easy to be 100% certain about that -- you can't just measure it with a ruler -- so claiming this bounty will be more difficult and will involve more verification (which might not even be possible) than the raw die-size bounty. Please post here if you have any questions about what would be sufficient to claim this bounty; I don't want any hard feelings.
I have offered bounties like this in the past and have a history of paying promptly.
Both of these bounties become null and void if BFL releases the figures themselves.
I need this figure in order to compute the η-factor for their product.
I will also offer a 20BTC bounty for knowledge of which process node BFL is using. However, I caution in advance that it's not as easy to be 100% certain about that -- you can't just measure it with a ruler -- so claiming this bounty will be more difficult and will involve more verification (which might not even be possible) than the raw die-size bounty. Please post here if you have any questions about what would be sufficient to claim this bounty; I don't want any hard feelings.
I have offered bounties like this in the past and have a history of paying promptly.
Both of these bounties become null and void if BFL releases the figures themselves.
Hi Elden, the node and method are detailed in the upcoming issue of bitcoin magazine. (Issue #4).
It'd be funny if BFL won this bounty.
LOL Josh mails him a Jalapeno.
October 23, 2012, 10:36:47 PM
I will offer a 20BTC bounty to anybody who posts a measurement of the size of the die used in BFL's "SC" devices. I'm assuming they all use the same chip. It's really easy to get the die measurement from a broken device -- just grind off the plastic/ceramic top using a dremel and pull out a ruler. I will be happy to escrow the bounty with a well-known forum member if you can present credible evidence that you're serious about this -- that way you can be sure you'll get paid before you totally wreck your already-broken device.
I need this figure in order to compute the η-factor for their product.
I will also offer a 20BTC bounty for knowledge of which process node BFL is using. However, I caution in advance that it's not as easy to be 100% certain about that -- you can't just measure it with a ruler -- so claiming this bounty will be more difficult and will involve more verification (which might not even be possible) than the raw die-size bounty. Please post here if you have any questions about what would be sufficient to claim this bounty; I don't want any hard feelings.
I have offered bounties like this in the past and have a history of paying promptly.
Both of these bounties become null and void if BFL releases the figures themselves.
I need this figure in order to compute the η-factor for their product.
I will also offer a 20BTC bounty for knowledge of which process node BFL is using. However, I caution in advance that it's not as easy to be 100% certain about that -- you can't just measure it with a ruler -- so claiming this bounty will be more difficult and will involve more verification (which might not even be possible) than the raw die-size bounty. Please post here if you have any questions about what would be sufficient to claim this bounty; I don't want any hard feelings.
I have offered bounties like this in the past and have a history of paying promptly.
Both of these bounties become null and void if BFL releases the figures themselves.
Hi Elden, the node and method are detailed in the upcoming issue of bitcoin magazine. (Issue #4).
It'd be funny if BFL won this bounty.
October 23, 2012, 10:31:28 PM
Probably 90nm. Seems to be the most cost effective.
Prepare for the improbable.
I believe my prediction of 65nm will be shown to be right
October 23, 2012, 09:35:55 PM
Probably 90nm. Seems to be the most cost effective.
Prepare for the improbable. Wouldn't that be nice...
Jump to: