Pages:
Author

Topic: Best demonstrated efficiency: 1290 Mhash/Joule (Read 20619 times)

hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 504
Run a Bitcoin node.
November 26, 2014, 02:16:48 AM
We just released a rev2 of our chip Smiley It would be nice to have this topic updated with latest info!

Sure, what are your Mhash/Joule numbers?

PS: sorry I have not been monitoring this thread for a while.
Can we have all the numbers also shown as J / GH?
It's a more common measurement these days.
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
We just released a rev2 of our chip Smiley It would be nice to have this topic updated with latest info!

Sure, what are your Mhash/Joule numbers?

PS: sorry I have not been monitoring this thread for a while.
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
We just released a rev2 of our chip Smiley It would be nice to have this topic updated with latest info!

Bump. Let's see some updates. Energy efficiency is starting to become a factor in profitability.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
We just released a rev2 of our chip Smiley It would be nice to have this topic updated with latest info!
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
Updated best result by bitfury's 55nm chip (1290 Mh/J at chip level!) This is roughly 65x more efficient than BFL's 40nm (Stratix II) FPGA-based Mini-Rig (20 Mh/J)!

Some people said a year ago that such then theoretical improvements would be plain absurd - well bitfury proves them wrong...
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
Thanks for the notice guys. Note that all my numbers are at the chip level. I added to the OP:

~230 Mhash/Joule (NOT FINAL) as estimated from BFL's 65nm ASIC prototype. They claim 170 Mhash/Joule at the wall. Both Avalon and Bitfountain/ASICMINER/friedcat lose ~25% of the power in AC/DC and DC/DC conversion and other elements, so if BFL experiences a comparable loss, we can infer 170/.75 = ~230 Mhash/Joule at the chip level.

I will update the thread title once the number is final.
RHA
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Wanna update BFL's numbers too? Latest is ~170MH/J.

yea, when they ship...
The thread title is "shipped efficiency" or "demonstrated efficiency"?
If "shipped", ASICminer hasn't shipped yet as well. Apart of dividends, no one received a unit yet.
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
ASICMINER's auction of a 10.75GH/s blade claims 83W, including the DC/DC conversion. That gives 130MH/J not inclusive of the AC/DC conversion to be compared with Avalon's 151MH/J. The 167MH/J is therefore most likely just the chips, which agrees with Friedcat's claim that just the chips are between 6-8J/GH depending on voltage and clock speed.

That still makes ASICMINER a little more efficient design than Avalon, as 151MH/J * (110/130)^2 is 108MH/J.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
Wanna update BFL's numbers too? Latest is ~170MH/J.

yea, when they ship...
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
Wanna update BFL's numbers too? Latest is ~170MH/J.
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
Updated OP with ASICMINER's 167 Mhash/J number.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 564
And FYI, FPGA board vendors don't talk about power consumption at the wall, but at the 12V level, after the AC/DC PSU.
BFL's FPGA power consumption figures are at the wall; you can get better-than-quoted power usage by using a more efficient PSU. As far as I know, the only vendors that measure power consumption at the 12V input are the ones which make you supply your own PSU. Icarus had both options and gave both power consumption stats:

After months of work, finally I build a FPGA mining cluster using the board "Icarus".
each board has 2 XC6SLX150 -2FGG484I on it, generates a 380MH/s hashing power. 19.2W (full load working) / 3.4W (idle) power consuming (board input, without fan). here a detail spec table:

Technology: Spartan6 -LX150 -2I (or -3C)
speed (MH/s): 380
$: 569 (1) / 469$ (multiple of 30) (-5$ if you do not need the adapter, recommend for bulk orders, they are heavy)
W: 4.5 for idle / 21 for full load. (notice this is the on wall power, include the adapter losses and fan)
Also, all FPGA vendors which reported board-level power consumption did so for the whole board including power wasted in the onboard DC-DC converters, not the chip power usage as Avalon is doing. It's not like you can really unsolder the chips and put them in your own board with more efficient power circuitry, after all!
E
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 100
One thing to keep in mind while interpreting BFL schedule performance and customer communication about schedule:

Quote
(TSMC) has equipped a state-of-the-art supply chain management system that improves both our customers' forecast processes and TSMC's delivery schedule accuracy. In 2009, the Company made 98 percent of scheduled deliveries within one day.

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1100
Alright, jgarzik measured 620 Watt at the wall.

At the UPS socket not wall, to be specific.

mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
I agree that miners should look at the consumption at the wall to calculate their real cost. But the purpose of this thread, my thread, is to compare consumption at the chip level.

And FYI, FPGA board vendors don't talk about power consumption at the wall, but at the 12V level, after the AC/DC PSU.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
Which is just idiotic.  Why is the standard now "at the chip".  We have been measuring MH/J since CPU days and never once has anything been measured "at the chip".  Is the miner going to pay "at the chip" electrical rates?

I mean say Avalon releases a version 3 with even WORSE DC/DC regulator which is only 70% efficient thus making the cost to operate 20%+ higher will that still be viewed as 151 MH/J.  FPGA custom boards were measured at the wall.  Why suddenly the change in metrics now?

mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
Alright, jgarzik measured 620 Watt at the wall. And taking into account ngzhang information, we determine that the power consumed by the chips is:

(620 (Watt at the wall) * .82 (AC/DC PSU efficiency) - 5 (Watt minimum for the fans)) * .87 (DC/DC PSU efficiency) = 438 Watt

At 66.3 Ghash/s, that is 66300/438 = 151 Mhash/Joule. So this confirms ngzhang's original claim of 6.6-6.7 Watt per Ghash/s for the chips.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1497042

OP and title need to be corrected: It's closer to 100MH/s/J. It seems that Avalon uses 620w, not the 400W they've been claiming.
See ngzhang's post here before updating.

Consider PSU efficiency etc.
That is taking into account PSU inefficiencies. But that's an excuse for false advertising.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1100
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1497042

OP and title need to be corrected: It's closer to 100MH/s/J. It seems that Avalon uses 620w, not the 400W they've been claiming.

See ngzhang's post here before updating.

Consider PSU efficiency etc.

legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1497042

OP and title need to be corrected: It's closer to 100MH/s/J. It seems that Avalon uses 620w, not the 400W they've been claiming.
Holy. That is not what I was expecting at all. Has Avalon said whether they're using a standard cell or structured ASIC?
Pages:
Jump to: