[CLOSED] Cryptomine.io - Jan Campaign - page 20.

puzzel.me

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: bitkilo on November 29, 2014, 09:40:49 PM

Quote from: puzzel.me on November 29, 2014, 11:15:39 AM

Quote from: Carra23 on November 29, 2014, 10:52:47 AM

Quote from: Eisenhower34 on November 29, 2014, 09:44:01 AM

You have not conducted enough trades, nor have enough of a trading history to be able to be sufficient trusted with 7+ BTC of a company's funds. What gave them the idea to let you manage the campaign (you also don't have any experience in managing campaigns, and barely have experience participating in signature campaigns), and what logic did they use to trust you with so much money?

The fact that you are holding the funds for the campaign should not be enough to give participants confidence that they will be paid after 30 days (or even after 10 days).

EDIT: you should use a trusted escrow provider to hold funds for the protection of the campaign.

This is how it stays for now. I have updated the OP mentioning that some members are worried about possible payouts. Anybody is free to take up the 10 day option or apply for the campaign next month.

Regarding why they trusted me, only they can answer. I offered to create signatures, escrow and run the campaign and Eric accepted (later roslinpl made the signatures).

Anyways, you will all find out in a month.

Btw, Muhammad Zakir has been included in the campaign.

why cant you tansfer funds to an established escrow? Send the funds to a real escrow and then after a month carra can handle the campaign. That should be good

How do you think the established escrow guys got there trust, do u think they started out with good trust, no, they earn't it just like everybody else.
I have trust in carra, and am sure he will pay out.

None of the escrow held 7BTC in their first time. Thats the difference. Things are not right somewhere. You people dont get it, a new camapign cannot send funds to a new escrow. Both are not trusted + they are paying out too much.

bitkilo

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1010

https://www.bitcoin.com/

Quote from: puzzel.me on November 29, 2014, 11:15:39 AM

Quote from: Carra23 on November 29, 2014, 10:52:47 AM

Quote from: Eisenhower34 on November 29, 2014, 09:44:01 AM

You have not conducted enough trades, nor have enough of a trading history to be able to be sufficient trusted with 7+ BTC of a company's funds. What gave them the idea to let you manage the campaign (you also don't have any experience in managing campaigns, and barely have experience participating in signature campaigns), and what logic did they use to trust you with so much money?

The fact that you are holding the funds for the campaign should not be enough to give participants confidence that they will be paid after 30 days (or even after 10 days).

EDIT: you should use a trusted escrow provider to hold funds for the protection of the campaign.

This is how it stays for now. I have updated the OP mentioning that some members are worried about possible payouts. Anybody is free to take up the 10 day option or apply for the campaign next month.

Regarding why they trusted me, only they can answer. I offered to create signatures, escrow and run the campaign and Eric accepted (later roslinpl made the signatures).

Anyways, you will all find out in a month.

Btw, Muhammad Zakir has been included in the campaign.

why cant you tansfer funds to an established escrow? Send the funds to a real escrow and then after a month carra can handle the campaign. That should be good

How do you think the established escrow guys got there trust, do u think they started out with good trust, no, they earn't it just like everybody else.
I have trust in carra, and am sure he will pay out.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: Zich on November 29, 2014, 09:06:35 PM

This is simple guys

For participant, we had 3 choices:
1. Choose 10 days payment with reduction
2. Initial monthly payment
3. Leave Cryptomine.io - Signature Campaign

This is fair. Although the 10 day option would still give the OP free advertising and would not guarantee payment, plus it would likely result in them receiving lesser payment overall.

Quote from: Zich on November 29, 2014, 09:06:35 PM

For non participant:
>> Well, non participant had no right to ask for escrow.
If participant use alt account to ask, then it's their own fault. No need to argue about this.

This is not true. I would say that anyone who speaks out against the campaign manager would be looked at much more closely for potential disqualification from the campaign. Also similarly to how people will often not speak out against their "boss" participants will likely not want to speak out against the OP for fear of getting "fired" (although in most real world employment scenarios, employees are protected from this happening). The exact point of using an alt account is to voice an opinion that the person does not want associated with their "real" account.

Quote from: Zich on November 29, 2014, 09:06:35 PM

This is my first time enroll on signature campaign. I am not a gambler, i never win in gambling.
But this is not gambling, i didn't send any money for this bet. 50 required post is my normal post per month.
For fresh starter, i want to start with positive though. Yes, i had doubt before, but now the doubt is gone.

So i am willing to risk my 0.2 BTC to carra23

I would say that based on this post (and other posts in this thread) that you are almost certainly an alt of the OP and of the website. This is one major reason why it is not good to select participants in any order other then first come first serve. By handpicking participants like this the OP is making it possible that there would be accounts controlled by the OP participating which could make it look like some/most participants were paid when they were really not.

Zich

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

This is simple guys

For participant, we had 3 choices:
1. Choose 10 days payment with reduction
2. Initial monthly payment
3. Leave Cryptomine.io - Signature Campaign

For non participant:
>> Well, non participant had no right to ask for escrow.
If participant use alt account to ask, then it's their own fault. No need to argue about this.

This is my first time enroll on signature campaign. I am not a gambler, i never win in gambling.
But this is not gambling, i didn't send any money for this bet. 50 required post is my normal post per month.
For fresh starter, i want to start with positive though. Yes, i had doubt before, but now i don't care anymore.

So i am willing to risk my 0.2 BTC to carra23

cheekychap

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: melisande on November 29, 2014, 04:18:42 PM

There is one slot opened in the member position, can i apply for that?

I think, Cara said that there are users in the waiting list, who will be enrolled before any new users are accepted.

melisande

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

There is one slot opened in the member position, can i apply for that?

Magic8Ball

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Carra23 on November 27, 2014, 07:06:33 AM

Hero Member:

1. nahtnam
2. Magic8Ball
3. alani123
4. sumantso
5. Zich
6. alexrossi
7. monbux

Thanks for including me. I have included the signature.

Posts: 927
Address: 15xHVsfkkqSFH5vchCf1nHBHxvbQ6oQAnZ

cheekychap

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: Carra23 on November 28, 2014, 12:36:49 PM

Quote from: cheekychap on November 28, 2014, 12:30:20 PM

Quote from: Carra23 on November 28, 2014, 12:18:38 PM

Seriously, can I get the views of those that are actually in the campaign rather than a lot of sockpuppets and negative trust members (not you)?

I am part of the campaign. I have requested for a 10 day payout, but I am obviously not happy that I am being offered a reduced payment. I understand that you don't want to do the extra work. You won't have to do that, if you agree to a trusted member holding the funds. I would be happy to accept monthly payments, if that can be possible.

You are still getting a higher rate than other campaigns.

How about it, the funds I have cover the payments for the participants if they all achieve the maximum payout. If they do not and there is leftover, I will divide it proportionately among those with reduced pay (subject to the maximum being full pay).

Alright. Would still be great if that can be left at 10% below the campaign price. Thats almost 0.01.
Thanks

monbux

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1029

Quote from: pawel7777 on November 29, 2014, 04:20:29 AM

Quote from: Zich on November 29, 2014, 12:03:19 AM

Of course not, no one receive upfront payment Cheesy

Woo, monbux join the campaign

This is good sign right

Is it a good sign?

Notice he didn't even apply to join. You won't find his post anywhere in this thread. And yet he joins the officially closed campaign. So there are 2 options:

1) monbux is not even aware that he's enrolled, or
2) carra breaks his own rules and grants monbux a back-door entry to the CLOSED campaign.

Did carra actually explained why he don't want to escrow the funds? It may seems like he's avoiding the subject.
There is a clear demand from participants for the trusted escrow. They were willing to do the escrow in the old/original campaign thread. There is a trusted member who is willing to escrow for free. So what's the problem?

I'm not accusing anyone of scam, but something is 'not-quite-right' with this campaign.

Hi, regarding this, I actually PMed them asking if there was still a spot open (because closed signature campaigns can turn open in an instant), and they replied that there was. That's all. I PMed the actual cryptomining account, as well as carra.

monbux

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1029

Quote from: Seketsuna on November 29, 2014, 12:39:30 AM

Quote from: Zich on November 29, 2014, 12:03:19 AM

Quote from: BAGOBO on November 28, 2014, 11:39:39 PM

Quote from: Carra23 on November 28, 2014, 11:36:19 PM

Quote from: Seketsuna on November 28, 2014, 08:35:36 PM

Please remove me from the list of participants. Escrow holder has no trust and i would suggest others would do so coz you might not get paid..

OK

Quote from: panju1 on November 28, 2014, 11:29:24 PM

Quote from: Zich on November 28, 2014, 11:25:15 PM

0.35 BTC just added to wallet Shocked

From which address? Are you sure it is related to this thread?

I, for one, haven't received anything.

A Hero Member slot was added, and hence an added 0.35 BTC.

So hero member receive upfront payment ?
to show that this campaign still legit

Of course not, no one receive upfront payment Cheesy

Woo, monbux join the campaign

This is good sign right

how the hell does monbux giving it a good sign? like Dooglus promoted dicebitcoin and diceninja look what happened to them LOL

Hi guys,
Yes, I have joined this signature campaign, but please make your OWN judgement on whether to trust their company or not. I joined because well, it's high paying and I've been looking for other alternative mining sites to cex.io (fees are insane). So, I am in no way affiliated with this company, once again you must make your OWN decisions!

P.S. I am not receiving upfront payment, I am just a regular hero member in their signature campaign.

Cheers,
monbux

puzzel.me

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: Carra23 on November 29, 2014, 10:52:47 AM

Quote from: Eisenhower34 on November 29, 2014, 09:44:01 AM

You have not conducted enough trades, nor have enough of a trading history to be able to be sufficient trusted with 7+ BTC of a company's funds. What gave them the idea to let you manage the campaign (you also don't have any experience in managing campaigns, and barely have experience participating in signature campaigns), and what logic did they use to trust you with so much money?

The fact that you are holding the funds for the campaign should not be enough to give participants confidence that they will be paid after 30 days (or even after 10 days).

EDIT: you should use a trusted escrow provider to hold funds for the protection of the campaign.

This is how it stays for now. I have updated the OP mentioning that some members are worried about possible payouts. Anybody is free to take up the 10 day option or apply for the campaign next month.

Regarding why they trusted me, only they can answer. I offered to create signatures, escrow and run the campaign and Eric accepted (later roslinpl made the signatures).

Anyways, you will all find out in a month.

Btw, Muhammad Zakir has been included in the campaign.

EDIT: This is the final say from me regarding this particular matter. The campaign has not started yet, so participants can take any option they wish. For the rest, you have made your say, anybody looking at the OP or through the thread can see the concerns.

Why has the eric guy taken a backseat, and how come you are taking every final decisions? Did you just buy the website or your account got sold?

alexrossi

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1742

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: Carra23 on November 29, 2014, 10:52:47 AM

This is how it stays for now. I have updated the OP mentioning that some members are worried about possible payouts. Anybody is free to take up the 10 day option or apply for the campaign next month.

Regarding why they trusted me, only they can answer. I offered to create signatures, escrow and run the campaign and Eric accepted (later roslinpl made the signatures).

Anyways, you will all find out in a month.

Btw, Muhammad Zakir has been included in the campaign.

EDIT: This is the final say from me regarding this particular matter. The campaign has not started yet, so participants can take any option they wish. For the rest, you have made your say, anybody looking at the OP or through the thread can see the concerns.

Just my humble opinion, but personally i feel safe with Carra23 as sig manager. "Risking" 0.2-0.35 btc is an acceptable risk, i think that this is not a work, just a very nice bonus for constructive posting.

puzzel.me

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: Carra23 on November 29, 2014, 10:52:47 AM

Quote from: Eisenhower34 on November 29, 2014, 09:44:01 AM

You have not conducted enough trades, nor have enough of a trading history to be able to be sufficient trusted with 7+ BTC of a company's funds. What gave them the idea to let you manage the campaign (you also don't have any experience in managing campaigns, and barely have experience participating in signature campaigns), and what logic did they use to trust you with so much money?

The fact that you are holding the funds for the campaign should not be enough to give participants confidence that they will be paid after 30 days (or even after 10 days).

EDIT: you should use a trusted escrow provider to hold funds for the protection of the campaign.

This is how it stays for now. I have updated the OP mentioning that some members are worried about possible payouts. Anybody is free to take up the 10 day option or apply for the campaign next month.

Regarding why they trusted me, only they can answer. I offered to create signatures, escrow and run the campaign and Eric accepted (later roslinpl made the signatures).

Anyways, you will all find out in a month.

Btw, Muhammad Zakir has been included in the campaign.

why cant you tansfer funds to an established escrow? Send the funds to a real escrow and then after a month carra can handle the campaign. That should be good

Carra23

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1000

Need a campaign manager? PM me

Quote from: Eisenhower34 on November 29, 2014, 09:44:01 AM

You have not conducted enough trades, nor have enough of a trading history to be able to be sufficient trusted with 7+ BTC of a company's funds. What gave them the idea to let you manage the campaign (you also don't have any experience in managing campaigns, and barely have experience participating in signature campaigns), and what logic did they use to trust you with so much money?

The fact that you are holding the funds for the campaign should not be enough to give participants confidence that they will be paid after 30 days (or even after 10 days).

EDIT: you should use a trusted escrow provider to hold funds for the protection of the campaign.

This is how it stays for now. I have updated the OP mentioning that some members are worried about possible payouts. Anybody is free to take up the 10 day option or apply for the campaign next month.

Regarding why they trusted me, only they can answer. I offered to create signatures, escrow and run the campaign and Eric accepted (later roslinpl made the signatures).

Anyways, you will all find out in a month.

Btw, Muhammad Zakir has been included in the campaign.

EDIT: This is the final say from me regarding this particular matter. The campaign has not started yet, so participants can take any option they wish. For the rest, you have made your say, anybody looking at the OP or through the thread can see the concerns.

4ever

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

I posted in their main thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9689998
If this Cara guy is not their account, then this should be sorted out. If they say no, and continue with Cara, then I guess its clear, Cara is their account. Too bad for them, no one will invest a penny in them. All their work will be wasted.

puzzel.me

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: Eisenhower34 on November 29, 2014, 09:44:01 AM

Quote from: Carra23 on November 27, 2014, 07:06:33 AM

-snip-
I have received the funds in this wallet 1FpLaKLmnC3mxCMeBiDiZRCRUdHd3yHnz4
The amount I have is enough to cover the total pay in BTC only if all the Full Members and higher makes 100+ constructive posts. In case the company runs into trouble and/or they do not provide the mining power for some reason, you will get the BTC amount only (not the 20% higher mining power).

---------------Message------------------
Funds for Cryptomine December campaign
---------------Signature-----------------
HCJh81VW0WD0C7WNQnsTZxJnlDgtyJkpOmM4Ty7E8bd3hzkQxXHHjj8japugrZqOvhN06D6zpQ82c/gWLEY/oYk=
------------------------------------------
--snip--

You have not conducted enough trades, nor have enough of a trading history to be able to be sufficient trusted with 7+ BTC of a company's funds. What gave them the idea to let you manage the campaign (you also don't have any experience in managing campaigns, and barely have experience participating in signature campaigns), and what logic did they use to trust you with so much money?

The fact that you are holding the funds for the campaign should not be enough to give participants confidence that they will be paid after 30 days (or even after 10 days).

EDIT: you should use a trusted escrow provider to hold funds for the protection of the campaign.

thats what all of us are saying since yesterday! But this carra guy(a farmed account) wont give a shit. He LL just ignore everyone. People should stop advertising them! They are a scam!

Muhammed Zakir

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 509

I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!

Quote from: redsn0w on November 29, 2014, 10:06:13 AM

I think this : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcointalk-escrows-trade-safely-855778 ( it is updated).

Thanks! Small list when compared to earlier lists. Roll Eyes

Needs a little update though.

~~MZ~~

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on November 29, 2014, 10:04:31 AM

Quote from: Jimmy Wales on November 29, 2014, 09:54:06 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on November 29, 2014, 09:46:38 AM

Quote from: Eisenhower34 on November 29, 2014, 09:44:01 AM

Quote from: Carra23 on November 27, 2014, 07:06:33 AM

-snip-
I have received the funds in this wallet 1FpLaKLmnC3mxCMeBiDiZRCRUdHd3yHnz4
The amount I have is enough to cover the total pay in BTC only if all the Full Members and higher makes 100+ constructive posts. In case the company runs into trouble and/or they do not provide the mining power for some reason, you will get the BTC amount only (not the 20% higher mining power).

---------------Message------------------
Funds for Cryptomine December campaign
---------------Signature-----------------
HCJh81VW0WD0C7WNQnsTZxJnlDgtyJkpOmM4Ty7E8bd3hzkQxXHHjj8japugrZqOvhN06D6zpQ82c/gWLEY/oYk=
------------------------------------------
--snip--

You have not conducted enough trades, nor have enough of a trading history to be able to be sufficient trusted with 7+ BTC of a company's funds. What gave them the idea to let you manage the campaign (you also don't have any experience in managing campaigns, and barely have experience participating in signature campaigns), and what logic did they use to trust you with so much money?

The fact that you are holding the funds for the campaign should not be enough to give participants confidence that they will be paid after 30 days (or even after 10 days).

Awesome reply Wink

, now Carra23 doesn't has any excuse Roll Eyes

. Choose a reputable escrow : tomatocage, monbux, dooglus , etc....

tomatocage or dooglus will be great, but monbux is a strict no no. He is not on DefaultTrust and has probably the highest -ve on BitcoinTalk++. I think DannyHamilton would be great as escrow as well => https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dannyhamiltons-escrow-service-254369

Earlier people can vote more than once, so a scammer made it, I think. You can check trust feedback he got. He is a good escrower.

P.S. I earlier found 2 escrowers' lists but both were discontinued. Is there any up-to-date escrowers' list?

~~MZ~~

I think this : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcointalk-escrows-trade-safely-855778 ( it is updated).

Muhammed Zakir

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 509

I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!

Quote from: Jimmy Wales on November 29, 2014, 09:54:06 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on November 29, 2014, 09:46:38 AM

Quote from: Eisenhower34 on November 29, 2014, 09:44:01 AM

Quote from: Carra23 on November 27, 2014, 07:06:33 AM

-snip-
I have received the funds in this wallet 1FpLaKLmnC3mxCMeBiDiZRCRUdHd3yHnz4
The amount I have is enough to cover the total pay in BTC only if all the Full Members and higher makes 100+ constructive posts. In case the company runs into trouble and/or they do not provide the mining power for some reason, you will get the BTC amount only (not the 20% higher mining power).

---------------Message------------------
Funds for Cryptomine December campaign
---------------Signature-----------------
HCJh81VW0WD0C7WNQnsTZxJnlDgtyJkpOmM4Ty7E8bd3hzkQxXHHjj8japugrZqOvhN06D6zpQ82c/gWLEY/oYk=
------------------------------------------
--snip--

You have not conducted enough trades, nor have enough of a trading history to be able to be sufficient trusted with 7+ BTC of a company's funds. What gave them the idea to let you manage the campaign (you also don't have any experience in managing campaigns, and barely have experience participating in signature campaigns), and what logic did they use to trust you with so much money?

The fact that you are holding the funds for the campaign should not be enough to give participants confidence that they will be paid after 30 days (or even after 10 days).

Awesome reply Wink

, now Carra23 doesn't has any excuse Roll Eyes

. Choose a reputable escrow : tomatocage, monbux, dooglus , etc....

tomatocage or dooglus will be great, but monbux is a strict no no. He is not on DefaultTrust and has probably the highest -ve on BitcoinTalk++. I think DannyHamilton would be great as escrow as well => https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dannyhamiltons-escrow-service-254369

Earlier people can vote more than once, so a scammer made it, I think. You can check trust feedback he got. He is a good escrower.

P.S. I earlier found 2 escrowers' lists but both were discontinued. Is there any up-to-date escrowers' list?

~~MZ~~

Jimmy Wales

member

Activity: 144

Merit: 17

Quote from: redsn0w on November 29, 2014, 09:46:38 AM

Quote from: Eisenhower34 on November 29, 2014, 09:44:01 AM

Quote from: Carra23 on November 27, 2014, 07:06:33 AM

-snip-
I have received the funds in this wallet 1FpLaKLmnC3mxCMeBiDiZRCRUdHd3yHnz4
The amount I have is enough to cover the total pay in BTC only if all the Full Members and higher makes 100+ constructive posts. In case the company runs into trouble and/or they do not provide the mining power for some reason, you will get the BTC amount only (not the 20% higher mining power).

---------------Message------------------
Funds for Cryptomine December campaign
---------------Signature-----------------
HCJh81VW0WD0C7WNQnsTZxJnlDgtyJkpOmM4Ty7E8bd3hzkQxXHHjj8japugrZqOvhN06D6zpQ82c/gWLEY/oYk=
------------------------------------------
--snip--

You have not conducted enough trades, nor have enough of a trading history to be able to be sufficient trusted with 7+ BTC of a company's funds. What gave them the idea to let you manage the campaign (you also don't have any experience in managing campaigns, and barely have experience participating in signature campaigns), and what logic did they use to trust you with so much money?

The fact that you are holding the funds for the campaign should not be enough to give participants confidence that they will be paid after 30 days (or even after 10 days).

Awesome reply Wink

, now Carra23 doesn't has any excuse Roll Eyes

. Choose a reputable escrow : tomatocage, monbux, dooglus , etc....

tomatocage or dooglus will be great, but monbux is a strict no no. He is not on DefaultTrust and has probably the highest -ve on BitcoinTalk++. I think DannyHamilton would be great as escrow as well => https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dannyhamiltons-escrow-service-254369

Topic: [CLOSED] Cryptomine.io - Jan Campaign - page 20. (Read 31967 times)