Pages:
Author

Topic: [CLOSED] Cryptomine.io - Jan Campaign - page 25. (Read 31967 times)

legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
November 28, 2014, 05:38:21 AM
This one does not count Grin

I will check through later today and quote all those who have already added the signature.

I think all the posts here should not be count. .
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Need a campaign manager? PM me
November 28, 2014, 05:36:18 AM
I was just reading through the OP. Seems like we can also receive the payment in mining power. Can we have more details on that?

I am not sure about that. I will find out. The amount I have is enough to cover the total pay in BTC only if all the Full Members and higher makes 100+ constructive posts. So in case the company runs into trouble and/or they do not provide the mining power for some reason, you will get the BTC amount only (not the 20% higher mining power).

..........

Then good luck with the signature campaign I hope he will not miss any your post.


I will pray  Cheesy

This one does not count Grin

I will check through later today and quote all those who have already added the signature.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
November 28, 2014, 05:29:43 AM
..........

Then good luck with the signature campaign I hope he will not miss any your post.


I will pray  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
November 28, 2014, 05:26:20 AM
..........

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking Wink.

The count start when we put  the signature  Smiley

Yes , I understand but the sig. campaign will start officially the 1st December so I think now the post that you make  will not be counted.


Hi Carra23, post count will start from Monday, 1st of December right?


It will start as soon as somebody puts a signature in. So somebody can start ahead of Dec 1st and their counter will start.

Then good luck with the signature campaign I hope he will not miss any your post.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
November 28, 2014, 05:22:42 AM
..........

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking Wink.

The count start when we put  the signature  Smiley

Yes , I understand but the sig. campaign will start officially the 1st December so I think now the post that you make  will not be counted.


Hi Carra23, post count will start from Monday, 1st of December right?


It will start as soon as somebody puts a signature in. So somebody can start ahead of Dec 1st and their counter will start.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
November 28, 2014, 05:15:42 AM
 Cry Cry Cry CAN  Cry Cry Cry SOMEBODY  Cry Cry Cry EXPLAIN  Cry Cry Cry TO  Cry Cry Cry ME  Cry Cry Cry HOW  Cry Cry CryCry Cry Cry MISSED  Cry Cry Cry THIS  Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry
Pm me a slot or someone should give me his or her own. LOL
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
November 28, 2014, 05:10:37 AM
what if Carra23 and Cryptomine.Gabriel (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9300969) is only one person? Huh

i mean, is Carra23 really an escrow or thats is the main BCT forum account of the Crytomine owner? Huh

what do you think guys?
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
November 28, 2014, 04:51:23 AM
Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ



Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?

Have you read at least post #2 ?

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking Wink.

The count start when we put  the signature  Smiley

Yes , I understand but the sig. campaign will start officially the 1st December so I think now the post that you make  will not be counted.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
GreenCoin
November 28, 2014, 04:49:35 AM
Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ



Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?

Have you read at least post #2 ?

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking Wink.

I think users are allowed to update their signatures, but are free to change it by December 1st as well. If they change it now, they can be evaluated before the end of December. I think Op should confirm this as well, and make a record of the starting posts for differrent users.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
November 28, 2014, 04:46:28 AM
Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ



Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?

Have you read at least post #2 ?

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking Wink.

The count start when we put  the signature  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
November 28, 2014, 04:42:45 AM
Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ



Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?

Have you read at least post #2 ?

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking Wink.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 256
November 28, 2014, 04:27:48 AM
Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ



Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?

Have you read at least post #2 ?
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 504
November 28, 2014, 04:19:33 AM

If I get enough participants doubting the funds, I will get some other escrow. To me it looks redundant as if I can be trusted to hand back the amount, I can be trusted to pay out; but nevertheless I would not want this to cause participants worry.

I see lot of participants requesting it now. Common Cara, get another escrow. You can manage the campaign. I see no reason now, why you won't .

Actually none of the participant request escrow yet.

You just did above. Do you want to risk getting not paid? Or a better escrow for this campaign?

I just answer allcoinminer, that not count  Roll Eyes
Half of me want escrow, but the other half had faith on carra23. So it's still undecided.


That's an invalid faith. There is no material reason for that trust.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
November 28, 2014, 04:15:49 AM
Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ



Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 256
November 28, 2014, 04:11:50 AM
Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
November 28, 2014, 03:44:24 AM
What is going on? Escrow War?

I suppose no spots are open for me.


I told to carra23 and also to the owner of the site  : I can make as escrow for free.


At the end carra23 replied me " this is not necessary an escrow I will make it"  and he added "if it is necessary I will search another trusted escrow and not you ".


However I think I'm trusted check my thread  and all my feedbacks.

You have a green trust and I can look that

Maybe Carra23 prefer someone green from default trust
Who knows  Tongue

It is not question of the greenTrust , he is not an escrow .

Yep. Green trust does not matter.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
November 28, 2014, 03:41:49 AM

If I get enough participants doubting the funds, I will get some other escrow. To me it looks redundant as if I can be trusted to hand back the amount, I can be trusted to pay out; but nevertheless I would not want this to cause participants worry.

I see lot of participants requesting it now. Common Cara, get another escrow. You can manage the campaign. I see no reason now, why you won't .

Actually none of the participant request escrow yet.

You just did above. Do you want to risk getting not paid? Or a better escrow for this campaign?

I just answer allcoinminer, that not count  Roll Eyes
Half of me want escrow, but the other half had faith on carra23. So it's still undecided.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
November 28, 2014, 03:35:03 AM
I told to carra23 and also to the owner of the site  : I can make as escrow for free.


At the end carra23 replied me " this is not necessary an escrow I will make it"  and he added "if it is necessary I will search another trusted escrow and not you ".


However I think I'm trusted check my thread  and all my feedbacks.

You have a green trust and I can look that

Maybe Carra23 prefer someone green from default trust
Who knows  Tongue

It is not question of the greenTrust , he is not an escrow .

redsn0w is better than Carra23 but not the best. But for this amount,
If op is looking for the escrow then should opt for a highly experienced and trustworthy escrow providers like, John (John K., escrow.ms, etc.

Thanks for the opinion , in the past I've   made as escrow for a signature campaign (barwick cloud mining)  so for me it is not a problem do it this time.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
November 28, 2014, 03:33:55 AM

If I get enough participants doubting the funds, I will get some other escrow. To me it looks redundant as if I can be trusted to hand back the amount, I can be trusted to pay out; but nevertheless I would not want this to cause participants worry.

I see lot of participants requesting it now. Common Cara, get another escrow. You can manage the campaign. I see no reason now, why you won't .

Actually none of the participant request escrow yet.

You just did above. Do you want to risk getting not paid? Or a better escrow for this campaign?
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
November 28, 2014, 03:30:01 AM

If I get enough participants doubting the funds, I will get some other escrow. To me it looks redundant as if I can be trusted to hand back the amount, I can be trusted to pay out; but nevertheless I would not want this to cause participants worry.

I see lot of participants requesting it now. Common Cara, get another escrow. You can manage the campaign. I see no reason now, why you won't .

Actually none of the participant request escrow yet.
Pages:
Jump to: