Of the 352 registered participants of Twitter Campaign, you approved the participation of only 31 people?
Are you completely idiots?
About whiich "fake subscribers" do you write in the Spreadsheet, if I have a TwitterAudit PRO?
I check every week that there is not a single fake...
YOU ARE REAL SWINDLERS!
Throughout the whole time, we all advertised your project, and now you do not want to pay any of us?
Such scams as your Bounty-campaign, I have not met yet...
Me too I'm using an audit pro, At first I'm approved and given a week of stakes then after 2 weeks I'm tag with fake followers.
Quite dissappointing. But if thats their rule and so be it. They should have put it in the rule that the followers should interact if not it will be considered fake follower.
A certain ICO did.that but they considered it as a deduction for the supposed stakes that an account should receive. So still they paid for the work done but not full stake for the week.
Example if the stake should be 100 they deduct a certain percent for the fake followers. But still they pay.
Not sure which campaign are you mentioning, I suppose they are deducting the stakes based on the percentage of real followers from Twitteraudit? Sadly we are not fully trusting twitteraudit statistics, but it is still a good method to identify the quality of followers.
Thank you for taking your time explaining your situation, but the instruction I received is to not reward everyone who break the rules.
Of the 352 registered participants of Twitter Campaign, you approved the participation of only 31 people?
Are you completely idiots?
About whiich "fake subscribers" do you write in the Spreadsheet, if I have a TwitterAudit PRO?
I check every week that there is not a single fake...
YOU ARE REAL SWINDLERS!
Throughout the whole time, we all advertised your project, and now you do not want to pay any of us?
Such scams as your Bounty-campaign, I have not met yet...
Me too I'm using an audit pro, At first I'm approved and given a week of stakes then after 2 weeks I'm tag with fake followers.
Quite dissappointing. But if thats their rule and so be it. They should have put it in the rule that the followers should interact if not it will be considered fake follower.
A certain ICO did.that but they considered it as a deduction for the supposed stakes that an account should receive. So still they paid for the work done but not full stake for the week.
Example if the stake should be 100 they deduct a certain percent for the fake followers. But still they pay.
I am very very dissappointed with this project, we have campaigned their project and at the end of the campaign they say our follower is fake
so what use twitteraudit
I would like to clarify something, this decision was made about a week ago, not at the end of the campaign.
Second, we need twitteraudit as one of the method to identify the identity of your followers, as seen above, I have gave an evidence for someone to prove that their followers didn't meet our expectation.
I would like to say thank you to everyone who helped us to promote the project, but the rules are there, those who broke them are not eligible to get the reward.