[...]
The only reason why we’re going around in circles is because you and PMALEK have turned this into a witch hunt and shifted this entire post into an attack on my decisions and gambling mistakes, rather than focusing on the issues I highlighted. This is why I came to the conclusion that your judgement and language has an element of spite towards gambling in itself or the amount of money that was lost.
[...]
Umm... sorry, but... who goes to a witch hunt, again? Let's trace it back.
Your first thread is about
how Cloudbet "exploited" your weakness, of which, within your opening post, you argued that they should void your loses since you're betting on prohibited jurisdiction.
And later, you also accuse CasinoGuru, an arbitrator, as a platform that's
on Cloudbet's payroll because they're taking referral [of which the purpose had been made clear to you over and over]. The reason behind this? Because CG ruled your complaint as rejected, for the reason that's more or less as described on your previous thread [above] and this thread. Being asked why were you OK with AG to take the same "payroll" [i.e. referral], and was it just because they accepted your negative review so you're ok with that, the thread suddenly not attended anymore.
On your first thread too, I
serve my findings of your accusation [from the thread about CG] that there are 70+ cases against Cloudbet, where, 35 out of 36 of it were solved, and the other 1 is inconclusive. I asked you to give the rest so I can take another look and gained better perspective of Cloudbet's situation.
Your answer? None. You didn't address that query at all. Nor that it ever being mentioned again. I guess we can assume it's another straw failed to be grasped.
Instead, you made another thread, this thread, under a reason that there is a development for your case. Though up to this day, I can't see why the need of another thread while you can simply edited the opening post with the development [you edited the first post on that thread earlier, so it's pretty much safe to assume you know how to edit a post].
Now, if your intention is simply and purely to raise an awareness about cloudbet and deter their bad behaviour, IMO, from my perspective, you can also move that topic about 70+ cases [I've told you that I am waiting for the second batch] here too. But no, the topic does not goes any further. Probably because with half of it turns out to be solved, it didn't serve as a good basis for your case, so you leave it.
So, who does a witch hunt, again?
While we're at it, if I may give voice to my opinion, I think your initial attempt is truly to peer pressuring them into paying your lost bet by voiding it, and when the story didn't work as you planned, you changed the narrative, just now, by saying that it's not in your intention at all to ask for the refund and instead, you simply tried to warn them.
But sure, let's put all those behind us, let's address what your heart truly desire. You care about the community from cloudbet's deceptive behaviour? Compile me that list, and see where the forum goes from that.
Just to make it clear, again, I couldn't care less with proving Cloudbet is the right one here, I am not on their payroll, not their staff, not affiliated by them by any degree. This is why I ask you to provide me with the list, to see if they're indeed proven to have bad reputation.