Topic: ▁ ▂ ▄ ▅ ▆ Cloudmining 101 (ponzi risk assessment) ▆ ▅ ▄ ▂ ▁ - page 57. (Read 361551 times)

You should start your own thread. A good title would be "flyingplows misinformation and baseless ratings thread".

btw i even liked hashie and i listen to their goodbye song once in a while, i dont blame them - i got tranfered to amhash, all i blame is you 

Your own posting history shows that while you had doubts and asked the right questions, you were far from certain if PBmining, Hashie and many of the other oh so obvious scams where at all scams.
[/quote]

of course i was... just wanted some other opinions  and wanted to become a hero member and start my own rating thread

not that i would believe a word you say, but i was talking about the state of the companies at the time of being ''rated''. btw i dont get how a vanish of ceo can be a life changing event for a BIG company, well unless its 10 person company. either way i am tired and i'll go to sleep now, i just wanted to say - i hate you guys (well not sure if thats not the same person but...) because of promoting scams.  

p.s. the way you defend this puppet, makes your rating irrelevant - if what you say is even supposed to be true then your rating is of no value, you should rename it to scam rating not ponzi rating and include very different and deeper criteria...

Your own posting history shows that while you had doubts and asked the right questions, you were far from certain if PBmining, Hashie and many of the other oh so obvious scams where at all scams.

Asicminer has been around much longer than Bitmain (around 1 year longer), and has been a "legit company" producing miners and shipping them all over the world for ~2.5 years now. They've sold millions of dollars worth of hardware and scammed absolutely nobody before this debacle.

Bitmain/hashnest just as easily could have had their hardware stolen and/or CEO disappear and you'd be left holding the bag just like AM/AMhash holders are today.

Puppets guide doesn't guarantee you won't get scammed (even the most legit businesses can turn in to scams), it just helps you pick out the obvious scams (like Kryptologika which you seem to be seriously considering).

pbmining? come on man 

and i will tell you how hashnest is more legit - maybe because bitmain is a legit company producing miners and shipping all over the world and rockminer is a dead company (read rockminer announcement about themselves out of business if you haven't) , not even talking about asicminer which is not a company at all, it seems asicminer is just some mistreated cat or smth. what a scam have they forged before going bankrupt... amazing isn't it? 

So you knew hashie, pbmining etc where ponzi's all along? Good on you, but let me tell you precious few people believed me at the time. And its those people I tried reaching with this 101.

As for nobody doubting hashnest, tell me, how is it more legit than amhash was?

you just dont include enough because if you did you could claim you were right on 100 out of 101, but the thing is that on the only one that was important YOU WERE WRONG. nobody doubts hashnest is legit and all those other are so obvious its even funny to rate them.  
of course you can write what you want, not that its relevant, but you voice your opinion in other threads so i decided to voice in yours.

As for this:


I hereby give permission to the mods to publish any and all PMs between me and amhash. The only thing I ever discussed with them was prior to hashie's collapse, how they could guarantee the hashrate purchased through hashie, since I knew hashie was a scam and would run off. Thats it.

My list is no substitute for your own due diligence and risk analysis, nor did I ever claim it was. You should have tried reading the disclaimer:


Amhash did provide the reasonable evidence and the score I gave was fully warranted based on the criteria as I defined them. If you interpreted that somehow as meaning zero risk, you have yourself to blame for that. I couldnt have foreseen what happened any more than I could have foreseen a meteorite striking their building.

But I will say this: I offered to take bets on each of the 6-7 point scams that they would scam their customers, and each of the 0-1 points that they would not. Had anyone taken me up on those bets, I would so far have won 20 out of 21 bets.  Who's got a better average?

Well Pup.... someone is shitting in your nest

NOW LISTEN TO THIS:
i feel i also have the right to tell what i think about puppet''s rating, and i think it is corrupted or at least biased.
amhash should be rated:

1. o.5 points (no user selectable pool)
2. 1 (rockminer has no equipment and asicminer is laughable - is it even a company lol, it is rather a person of semi-anonymous identity)
3. 1 (i did not see any picture that holds a note it belongs to amhash - it can be pictures of any farm) - plz correct me if i am wrong on this one
4. 1 (lol, it is beyond stupidity, its not even a criteria, like, of course, if you sell in batches or if you claim huge hashrate at once in the first place - you are more legit  , so its 1 cause you give it for everyone else.)
6. 1 (real amhash operators ARE anonymous)
7. 1 (unless puppet tells me how to exit now)
8. 1 (is a blatant lie by puppet - just take a look at the 1st page on amhash thread - friedcat says "3. Guaranteed profit".)

so amhash should score 6.5 = ponzi/scam, and i lost money because of you puppet, not a big amount but your rating causes more damage than it helps, especially if people trust you.
what i wanted to say - if people are to trust puppet - you people keep in mind that one incorrect rating causes 100x more damage than all the correct ones will save you, because you'll not need an advice on the obvious either way and you may be misled on the ones that really matter...
puppet i trusted you without much research and i was burnt because of your corrupt rating, i will never trust you anymore.
p.s. if you dont mind disclosing private communications with you from cloudmining operator - please disclose communications between you and amhash, i think everybody would be interested now.

How is AMPonziHash not downgraded yet? I see it as 0-7 still...regardless of situation they have been a Ponzi for months.

No it is not best for my business. Not at this stage, I do not need to be verified by Puppet and the likes any more.
Besides you do not understand how it works, ask Puppet he was privy to this information.

Keep an eye on our thread if you are truly interested.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10692155
At this stage however you can buy our overpriced shares on the free market only or in packages of 200, 500 and 1,000 for EUR. Or perhaps just wait for the prices to collapse following Puppets FUD! Fingers crossed

You do what you think it's best for your business. But don't be surprised if the market decides what's best for the customers. You have to compete with ponzis which offer very good profit rates, you can only do that in time.

As a potential customer, I see no reason for you not to disclose your hashrate constantly to your actual customers. You could mine on p2pool style pools, tell them the btcguild or other pool username (split hashrate to maintain security), pay them with fresh coins, show them monitoring facilities, a tour of the mine, etc. There are so many options to offer, even case by case for each client that asks.

Puppet, we trust you, prove this man's hashrate privately!

From the start of this operation I was declaring limited transparency. Why? Because that's actually serves best our customers. I regret I disclosed anything to Puppet  then and I learned my lesson. If I start showing the hashrate I will be asked to do so every couple of days and if I refuse people like yourself will start shouting that kryptologika is a ponzi. For example I can buy large amount of hashrate on the market, show it to you sell shortly afterwards and go back to ponzi. Control of the hashrate is such an arbitrary thing... It tells you nothing.

So sorry but I must refuse to you and to all the others who no doubt will be asking for it in the future.

Some time ago I was pressed by someone who had the same arguments. I tried to explain that because of dropping diff dynamics running ponzi is not possible any more. And some week later we had this massive amount of collapses like lunamine, hashfast and others. So I believe an intelligent person understood that kryptologika wss reliable simply from the fact that it was on the market and we were reducing our prices at the time. Not much changed since.

Therefore I simply do not care. Fortunately this thread is not the most influential on the internet when it comes to bitcoin mining.

Actually it's your choice. And you have chosen badly. I have to side with Puppet here, you can't be trusted until you publicly demonstrate you control your hashrate. It's so simple too, just check this page: https://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=rankings§ion=teams

I can demonstrate my hashrate for days, this doesn't necessarily make it sure fact that I control that hashrate or that they're my miners or that I can remain solvent, but it's more than you have done so far, and it only took us 15 minutes to set up. No need to write soap operas on the forum or accuse people of wrongdoing.

Absolutely not. There is no need for it. We are trading as normal as our exposure to amhash is not detrimental.
Silver will be used when the shares loose profitability and users can choose: either to settle in BTC based on COMEX prices or request delivery.

Should you be interested further in Puppet's personal crusade against kryptologika please read more here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10690028

Should AMHash not come back, will you sell those silver coins in your possession to buy hashrate at another provider in order to cover your losses?