Pages:
Author

Topic: CloudThink.IO removed management pictures after being caught with stealing - page 8. (Read 31947 times)

newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
uhh I see again same guys whoring for few cents, check this legendary cheap slut as example:

Type: Twitter
Link:  https://twitter.com/ajareselde/status/617939644618043393
Bitcoin Address: :  1MZvjgQFQdAUUx5n6Prxw4oGuRycVmaZYR

cheers

Standard 2 Year Investment Package
Status Active
Renew Date Jun 19, 2017

I confirm i received the package as promised.
Thanks

Username: ajareselde
Address: 1MZvjgQFQdAUUx5n6Prxw4oGuRycVmaZYR
Member Type: Legendary
Data Joined: 8th June 2015

good thing is, that cloudthink don't offer "suck my d1ck" for 0.1BTC, because this guy would be first in queue...


He should get negged, no two words about it. He has been selling out for cheap for a long time. If he could be made an example of the others will flee.

legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1414
Things could get ugly with this and there might be alot of complaint in meta later about "trust abusing" or whatsoever

why should anybody complain about this..
-snip-

because he is already spreading lie for money

You missed my point. I am actually agree with negging them (references below) . I am just stating what will happen if this is done "brutally", therefore I proposed a "second chance" after they are being negged which is a neutral trust instead of red trust after they decided to leave this scam campaign and promise not to join a this kind of campaign later in the future.

Another way is to leave a red trust for X period of time and consider this as a punishment for them because I am seeing that if you leave this red trust there forever without giving them a second chance, it is pretty much in a wild west where you shoot and hang dead people body in the middle of the town so others will be afraid of this . For me this is pretty much uncivilized though I am stating my honest opinion here ( people could have a different opinion and thats normal isnt it ) Smiley

I am more into going for a "softer" way for this because I am pretty much bored with all the drama in meta about "X abusing trust by negging me" thread then we go over and over to explain that trust isnt moderated and so on.
With this

Code:
I am not against the idea of negging people who join this but I would propose to give them a second chance after being negged



it's hard to find a solution in my opinion. you could start giving neutral trust with a remark. neg trust seems a bit over the top.

Or giving them red trust for X period of time, 1 month for example and give them the second chance afterward ( Vod did this and I think its good )
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
Time to start negging people who promote this?

Things could get ugly with this and there might be alot of complaint in meta later about "trust abusing" or whatsoever ( wasnt this thing happened before in the past? ). I am not against the idea of negging people who join this but I would propose to give them a second chance after being negged. Those who have decided to stop promoting this scam should later be given neutral instead of red trust.

I dont see why people decided to jump into this, they havent paid their avatar campaign and there is a high risk that they wont be paid at all at this new campaign

it's hard to find a solution in my opinion. you could start giving neutral trust with a remark. neg trust seems a bit over the top.
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1001
/dev/null
Things could get ugly with this and there might be alot of complaint in meta later about "trust abusing" or whatsoever

why should anybody complain about this..you would buy a car from some guy, who is shouting on town square, that mcdonalds is healthy and quality food and throwing flyers around him like crazy? no...because he is already spreading lies for money, so why you should trust him..

and this board is same..
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1414
Time to start negging people who promote this?

Things could get ugly with this and there might be alot of complaint in meta later about "trust abusing" or whatsoever ( wasnt this thing happened before in the past? ). I am not against the idea of negging people who join this but I would propose to give them a second chance after being negged. Those who have decided to stop promoting this scam should later be given neutral instead of red trust.

I dont see why people decided to jump into this, they havent paid their avatar campaign and there is a high risk that they wont be paid at all at this new campaign
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1001
/dev/null
uhh I see again same guys whoring for few cents, check this legendary cheap slut as example:

Type: Twitter
Link:  https://twitter.com/ajareselde/status/618040361689157632
Link:  https://twitter.com/ajareselde/status/618099850492661760
Bitcoin Address: :  1MZvjgQFQdAUUx5n6Prxw4oGuRycVmaZYR

cheers

Type: Twitter
Link:  https://twitter.com/ajareselde/status/617939644618043393
Bitcoin Address: :  1MZvjgQFQdAUUx5n6Prxw4oGuRycVmaZYR

cheers

Standard 2 Year Investment Package
Status Active
Renew Date Jun 19, 2017

I confirm i received the package as promised.
Thanks

Username: ajareselde
Address: 1MZvjgQFQdAUUx5n6Prxw4oGuRycVmaZYR
Member Type: Legendary
Data Joined: 8th June 2015

good thing is, that cloudthink don't offer "suck my d1ck" for 0.1BTC, because this guy would be first in queue...

edit: new evidence added
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cloudthinkio-social-campaign-24-hour-payouts-daily-bonuses-closed-1110633

Time to start negging people who promote this? Maybe others will see and value their account more then the dollar or two they are getting paid.
IMO , Promoters are also part of this ponzi , they deserved to be marked too.
I am so sad to see the fact , 15 of 18 first participants are my fellow Indonesian.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cloudthinkio-social-campaign-24-hour-payouts-daily-bonuses-closed-1110633

Time to start negging people who promote this? Maybe others will see and value their account more then the dollar or two they are getting paid.
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1001
/dev/null
It looks like they're selling their hardware now.  Are they trustworthy?

please go to first page of this thread, read it again and you will find answer by yourself. even, they are now paying lot of money for PR, they are just ponzi and it will explode sooner or later..
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
It looks like they're selling their hardware now.  Are they trustworthy?
staff
Activity: 3458
Merit: 6793
Just writing some code
I went to the link for their store, and it is selling all their miners for really cheap. Seems super scammy. Another thing I noticed, Raspberry Pi B+ normally sold for $25 is being sold for $39! What a great deal Undecided
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1001
/dev/null
I had a belief CoinTelegraph was different but I was wrong, very wrong! :-\

http://cointelegraph.com/news/114740/cloudthink (archive)

CloudThink is a cloud mining service and mining hardware developer headquartered in the UK, with a second company running their mining operations in Taiwan. Unlike other cloud mining services, some of which simply allocate hashing power to their clients without further involvement, CloudThink offers daily payouts based upon the company's trading performance and guarantees customers a minimum level of profit based on the package contract they purchase

good job MZ to post archive link, because the article is already deleted without single explanation from cointelegraph site.

this is original link: http://cointelegraph.com/news/114740/cloudthink

they also linked it from facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cloud-Think-LTD/1626622564225357

and link is indexed by google: https://www.google.cz/search?q=cointelegraph+cloudthink

anyway, article is gone, so I put cointelegraph again to list of media, which I'm reading:))
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
I had a belief CoinTelegraph was different but I was wrong, very wrong! Undecided
Did Richard Coleman "buy" Cointelegraph ?

Yes and yes.

...I had some impression, that our fight vs scam in this thread made sense, anyway, we are obviously toothless..
Every point that has been raised in this thread is a valid query that any sane investor would make before parting with money. They have been met with hostility and no attempt at engagement by Cloudthink.
In the end, people make their own decisions, you can only do what you can do.

PS
This thread has has over 12,000 hits, that article less than 1% of that.
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1001
/dev/null
I had a belief CoinTelegraph was different but I was wrong, very wrong! Undecided

http://cointelegraph.com/news/114740/cloudthink (archive)

CloudThink is a cloud mining service and mining hardware developer headquartered in the UK, with a second company running their mining operations in Taiwan. Unlike other cloud mining services, some of which simply allocate hashing power to their clients without further involvement, CloudThink offers daily payouts based upon the company's trading performance and guarantees customers a minimum level of profit based on the package contract they purchase

how the hell is possible, that so-called respectable medium as cointelegraph is not even able to insert to google "cloudthink.io scam" and briefly read first few links?



anyway, thanks for sharing. I had some impression, that our fight vs scam in this thread made sense, anyway, we are obviously toothless..
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
I had a belief CoinTelegraph was different but I was wrong, very wrong! Undecided

http://cointelegraph.com/news/114740/cloudthink (archive)

CloudThink is a cloud mining service and mining hardware developer headquartered in the UK, with a second company running their mining operations in Taiwan. Unlike other cloud mining services, some of which simply allocate hashing power to their clients without further involvement, CloudThink offers daily payouts based upon the company's trading performance and guarantees customers a minimum level of profit based on the package contract they purchase

Big movement of cloudthink and big surprise to all of us.
Did Richard Coleman "buy" Cointelegraph ?
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
I had a belief CoinTelegraph was different but I was wrong, very wrong! Undecided

http://cointelegraph.com/news/114740/cloudthink (archive)

CloudThink is a cloud mining service and mining hardware developer headquartered in the UK, with a second company running their mining operations in Taiwan. Unlike other cloud mining services, some of which simply allocate hashing power to their clients without further involvement, CloudThink offers daily payouts based upon the company's trading performance and guarantees customers a minimum level of profit based on the package contract they purchase
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1001
/dev/null
i can see that their signature and avatar campaign are dead now , i think they got free advertisements for over 1 weeks.

Seems they announced the closing of the avatar campaign a week before and it wasn't them getting free advertising unless the participants didn't read. They still are running their company though won't be for long.

ohh yeah, and our fellow friend mirjangka posted something 6 days ago, amazing "CEO" rikkie 7 days ago. considering their previous activity on the board and total silence last days, I smell some bs already..end is soon and sooner, than we all expecting..:)
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
i can see that their signature and avatar campaign are dead now , i think they got free advertisements for over 1 weeks.

Seems they announced the closing of the avatar campaign a week before and it wasn't them getting free advertising unless the participants didn't read. They still are running their company though won't be for long.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1295
DiceSites.com owner
So unfair Sad others get money offers and I only got threats Sad

I will confirm your account ban request and instruct users to give you negative feedback

Im afraid neither methods would have worked though.
Pages:
Jump to: