Things could get ugly with this and there might be alot of complaint in meta later about "trust abusing" or whatsoever
why should anybody complain about this..
-snip-
because he is already spreading lie for money
You missed my point.
I am actually agree with negging them (references below) . I am just stating what will happen if this is done "brutally", therefore I proposed a "second chance" after they are being negged which is a neutral trust instead of red trust after they decided to leave this scam campaign and promise not to join a this kind of campaign later in the future.
Another way is to leave a red trust for X period of time and consider this as a punishment for them because I am seeing that if you leave this red trust there forever without giving them a second chance, it is pretty much in a wild west where you shoot and hang dead people body in the middle of the town so others will be afraid of this . For me this is pretty much uncivilized though I am stating my honest opinion here ( people could have a different opinion and thats normal isnt it )
I am more into going for a "softer" way for this because I am pretty much bored with all the drama in meta about "X abusing trust by negging me" thread then we go over and over to explain that trust isnt moderated and so on.
With this
I am not against the idea of negging people who join this but I would propose to give them a second chance after being negged
it's hard to find a solution in my opinion. you could start giving neutral trust with a remark. neg trust seems a bit over the top.
Or giving them red trust for X period of time, 1 month for example and give them the second chance afterward ( Vod did this and I think its good )