Author

Topic: CoinTerra announces its first ASIC - Hash-Rate greater than 500 GH/s - page 116. (Read 231002 times)

legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1026
In Cryptocoins I Trust
At this rate the only way CoinTerra is going to be worth is if they produce a 1TH/s machine and price it so good that nobody will even think of KnC. It has to be the same sort of difference like when you see BFLs 500GH/s machine sold for $22k when KnC is offer 400GH/s for $7k - it's a no brainer. Cointerra is going to have to pull off something like this. They openly stated that they want to make it more efficient with smaller chips etc, but with Bitcoin and where the difficulty is headed, that won't matter. Right now being first counts, because at the rate the difficulty is set, by the time the CoinTerra machines arrive, they are just going to be too late and overpriced.

To be honest, ASIC manufacturers should really be talking about 750GH~1TH/s at this point in time.

Yes, we plan to have > 1TH/s rigs, and Yes, the prices will be much lower than the competition. Our product lineup, specs, and prices are coming out by end of this month.

Can't wait for that.

Good luck from a fellow Texan.  Smiley
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
At this rate the only way CoinTerra is going to be worth is if they produce a 1TH/s machine and price it so good that nobody will even think of KnC. It has to be the same sort of difference like when you see BFLs 500GH/s machine sold for $22k when KnC is offer 400GH/s for $7k - it's a no brainer. Cointerra is going to have to pull off something like this. They openly stated that they want to make it more efficient with smaller chips etc, but with Bitcoin and where the difficulty is headed, that won't matter. Right now being first counts, because at the rate the difficulty is set, by the time the CoinTerra machines arrive, they are just going to be too late and overpriced.

To be honest, ASIC manufacturers should really be talking about 750GH~1TH/s at this point in time.

Yes, we plan to have > 1TH/s rigs, and Yes, the prices will be much lower than the competition. Our product lineup, specs, and prices are coming out by end of this month.
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
At this rate the only way CoinTerra is going to be worth is if they produce a 1TH/s machine and price it so good that nobody will even think of KnC. It has to be the same sort of difference like when you see BFLs 500GH/s machine sold for $22k when KnC is offer 400GH/s for $7k - it's a no brainer. Cointerra is going to have to pull off something like this. They openly stated that they want to make it more efficient with smaller chips etc, but with Bitcoin and where the difficulty is headed, that won't matter. Right now being first counts, because at the rate the difficulty is set, by the time the CoinTerra machines arrive, they are just going to be too late and overpriced.

To be honest, ASIC manufacturers should really be talking about 750GH~1TH/s at this point in time.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
♫ A wave came crashing like a fist to the jaw ♫
investomers  .... Love this FH
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1756
Verified Bernie Bro - Feel The Bern!
Remember initially they were going to have their NRE all paid for up-front. So what changed? I imagine their investor(s) looked at where the market and difficulty was going and decided it was way too much risk for however many million and backed out and Cointerra decided to offload risk to pre-order customers and continue with the venture.

That was HashFast, I think. Cointerra said they were going to do pre-orders but had spent like 1.5m already...
Someone showed a photo of their original presentation, I think to investors? somewhere earlier in this thread where they'd been planning to do upfront NRE themselves and sell finished products. That then changed and they affirmed the pre-order model.

Why would any company risk their own, or investors money when they can risk your money for nothing? 

Economics 101 people:

Business model A, fund entire business with owner/investor capital.  Company is successful and owners/investor make a killing.  Company flops, goes bankrupt etc owners/investors lose all/majority of investment

Business model B, fund as little of the start up as possible while still retaining all/majority ownership, round up investomers to pre-order and bare majority of risk.  Company is successful and owners make a killing, investomers simply get a product they paid for that they will be lucky to break even on and WILL be obsolete in a few months. Company flops, delays delivery, goes bankrupt etc and owners are out only initial funding (at worst, possible owners actually profit off bankrupting/delaying delivery LOL) while investomers lose EVERYTHING/majority of +ROI. 

There is a reason why the majority of ASIC manufacture's want you to shoulder the risk FOR them instead of WITH them, look at BFL and Avalon for two big reasons why (SHIT HAPPENS when you don't control every single solitary process and even sometimes when you do!)
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Remember initially they were going to have their NRE all paid for up-front. So what changed? I imagine their investor(s) looked at where the market and difficulty was going and decided it was way too much risk for however many million and backed out and Cointerra decided to offload risk to pre-order customers and continue with the venture.

That was HashFast, I think. Cointerra said they were going to do pre-orders but had spent like 1.5m already...
Someone showed a photo of their original presentation, I think to investors? somewhere earlier in this thread where they'd been planning to do upfront NRE themselves and sell finished products. That then changed and they affirmed the pre-order model.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Remember initially they were going to have their NRE all paid for up-front. So what changed? I imagine their investor(s) looked at where the market and difficulty was going and decided it was way too much risk for however many million and backed out and Cointerra decided to offload risk to pre-order customers and continue with the venture.

That was HashFast, I think. Cointerra said they were going to do pre-orders but had spent like 1.5m already...
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
The lower the prices the better.
Sure, but the rate of difficulty increase is flying so high right now that the value of X gigahash/sec is being cut in half by the month. So there's only so many more months until the difference between profit and market value is zero. I mean, this is crazy, I've never seen anything like this in any other industry. Profitability is a matter of weeks right now! We're certainly living history. Maybe this will be known as the great gigahash-crash of '13. Who knows. The market glutted with gigahash that can't pay for their purchase price and/or can't pay for their electricity costs if run, and hardware companies stuck with machines they can't sell anymore. That's bound to happen.

If Cointerra isn't careful they may be stuck with unsellable inventory.

Remember initially they were going to have their NRE all paid for up-front. So what changed? I imagine their investor(s) looked at where the market and difficulty was going and decided it was way too much risk for however many million and backed out and Cointerra decided to offload risk to pre-order customers and continue with the venture.

But despite their awesome experience and bona fides, it may simply be too late to make an impact, especially if KNC ships.

Wait too long and the only price someone will buy a Cointerra machine for is less than it costs to produce the device. Wait a bit longer and even the chip will be worth less than it costs to run it on electricity.

Well, Cointerra's chips will likely have world-class efficiency, so perhaps they'll always have chip-buys in the end, but it will be at a marginal profit at best, not BFL or Avalon profit. Those days are gone.
eve
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Round 1
Avalon, BFL, ASICMiner

Round 2
BitFury and KNC

Round 3
HashFast, XCrowd, Cointerra, Avalon v2

The pricing in round 3 is going to be cut throat.  XCrowd priced at $16k for 2.4 THs units.    So far that is the best price; right?
Round 3 is likely to crash and burn, methinks--if KNC ships there's going to be blood in the water everywhere else. Customers will melt away even at the cutthroat prices offered, and companies will be skinned to the bone on profit and not want to bother continuing for but little remuneration.

If you have a miner that's paid its hardware costs by November, you're in a pretty good position and it becomes a drawn-out efficiency game until the price of bitcoin either goes up considerably again or some new and more efficient tech comes down the pike.

The lower the prices the better.
hero member
Activity: 778
Merit: 563
Round 3 is likely to crash and burn, methinks--if KNC ships there's going to be blood in the water everywhere else. Customers will melt away even at the cutthroat prices offered, and companies will be skinned to the bone on profit and not want to bother continuing for but little remuneration.

If you have a miner that's paid its hardware costs by November, you're in a pretty good position and it becomes a drawn-out efficiency game until the price of bitcoin either goes up considerably again or some new and more efficient tech comes down the pike.

Completely agree...    god I hope KNC ships on schedule!   
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
Any options to do local pickup for warehouse or office complex ie pay on arrival at company and pay in person or maybe to do a deposit on order and then rest on collection?
Yes, such options are available. We will release the details on our website during the product launch by end of this month.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
I don't really get why people take XCrowd seriously. It seems scam-y as hell.

The issue I have with them is the high level of design.. weird, i know.  But no other company has put so much effort in design at their stage other than BFL.

The other thing keeping them talked about is the ability to escrow the funds.

Their designs make no sense at all - they look like they'd be really expensive to manufacture, compared to something like the Avalon case, anyway.

Maybe their plan is to lock up a bunch of money in escrow, then use that as an asset to get a loan from someone? Maybe they'll scam people with their multi-sig escrow for large BTC purchases. Or it's possible they really do have a ton of money and no idea what they're doing. In which case I don't see the need for escrow.
legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1001
Any options to do local pickup for warehouse or office complex ie pay on arrival at company and pay in person or maybe to do a deposit on order and then rest on collection?
hero member
Activity: 778
Merit: 563
I don't really get why people take XCrowd seriously. It seems scam-y as hell.

The issue I have with them is the high level of design.. weird, i know.  But no other company has put so much effort in design at their stage other than BFL.

The other thing keeping them talked about is the ability to escrow the funds.
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
The cost to produce silicon is far lower for us than the competition. The reasons being; we have way much better perf/mm2 and W/perf. So, yes we will be able to sell chips at a more affordable price for the low end miner.

Do you have some insider information on KnC and/or HashFast? Do you know how big their dies are going to be?

H/s/mm2 is a big deal, but at this point H/Joule isn't all that relevant at the moment.

H/Joule is relevant for us because that is what allowed us to pack more hash engines in the die without going overboard on the wattage. A better H/Joule allowed us a better overall H/mm2.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
The cost to produce silicon is far lower for us than the competition. The reasons being; we have way much better perf/mm2 and W/perf. So, yes we will be able to sell chips at a more affordable price for the low end miner.

Do you have some insider information on KnC and/or HashFast? Do you know how big their dies are going to be? Or are you just assuming that because your design is so awesome there's obviously no way your competition could be close Grin

H/s/mm2 is a big deal, but at this point H/Joule isn't all that relevant at the moment, and hopefully won't be for a while.
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
when will the price info be released?



The cost to produce silicon is far lower for us than the competition. The reasons being; we have way much better perf/mm2 and W/perf. So, yes we will be able to sell chips at a more affordable price for the low end miner.


The price info will be released before end of the month. The specs, SKUs, will all be released. We are waiting for our e-commerce platform to be ready before posting the price information. Don't want to release it prematurely when we still cannot accept orders.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
when will the price info be released?



The cost to produce silicon is far lower for us than the competition. The reasons being; we have way much better perf/mm2 and W/perf. So, yes we will be able to sell chips at a more affordable price for the low end miner.

member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
More pre-orders. Sigh, I hope we don't get another BFL or BitSynCon.

We need more specs than this. Price per GH/s is a start.

Where are the technical specs, their design team, Fab, their address and contact numbers?

Where everything else is in Bitcoin land.. In a deep dark place no one has access to.

This. So much this.

$/GH is coming soon. By end of this month it will be all out there on our website.
Design team is based in Austin, TX. Our Foundry is Global Foundries, Physical Design and Tapeout is done by Open-Silicon.
We are building our customer support team now, once we have it in place, we will give out our phone #s.
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
Actually, I think price would be more important.
Something is only a competitive advantage if your competition can't match it. KNC already announced a $5k price in November--the likely earliest ship date for Cointerra. What Cointerra might have on KNC is efficiency, maybe, we don't know exactly yet or by how much. KNC meanwhile has an earlier ship date, and that matters way more unless Cointerra wants to drop their miner's price precipitously in Nov, sub $5k, which I doubt they want to do.

Right, and unlike Cointerra, KnC has already paid for all their NRE.   That means that, unlike Cointerra and KnC at this point - they can dump the chips for any price above their fabrication/production/shipping cost and still make a profit.  

In fact, they can actually operate at a slight loss until their competition gives up.

Only way Cointerra can beat them is if their chips are far cheaper to produce then KnC's.

Hopefully they're taking lessons from what's happening with HashFast.

The cost to produce silicon is far lower for us than the competition. The reasons being; we have way much better perf/mm2 and W/perf. So, yes we will be able to sell chips at a more affordable price for the low end miner.
Jump to: