Pages:
Author

Topic: Confession - Zapo=aTriz. (Read 14028 times)

legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 12, 2023, 11:40:54 AM
#95
I've just seen in my notes there was also a connected UID TeamJamal [B.o] who was Last Active:    April 09, 2018, 03:07:25 PM [a.t] [w.a.o]

while Zapo [B.o] [a.t] [w.a.o] was created Date Registered:    April 08, 2018, 09:42:24 PM some 18 hours earlier.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
November 12, 2023, 03:20:34 AM
#94
I knew aTriz and Zapo were owned by the same person, but I don't recall that person owning the jamalaezaz account
I don't think aTriz and jamalaezaz were originally controlled by the same person, but after aTriz got tagged, at some point he gave his account access to someone else for signature earnings. So by now, it could be anyone controlling it.
Not that it matters, the account is properly tagged and anyone trusting him now should be well aware of the risks.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
November 11, 2023, 08:19:19 PM
#93
Some highly respected members seem to think that aTriZ = Zapo and I know Jamal owns the aTriZ account so 1 could conclude they are all 3 owned by the same person IMO.
I knew aTriz and Zapo were owned by the same person, but I don't recall that person owning the jamalaezaz account--and the link between the first two was made a few years ago, so my memory might be fuzzy on the matter.  However, I long suspected jamalaezaz of being shady, even before I tagged him but there was a time when aTriz was working his way up to being a respected campaign manager. 

I'll take a look at the trust pages for aTriz and jamalaezaz, but was that connection made a long time ago or more recently?  It could be a memory issue on my part, but I'm finding myself a little surprised that all three of these accounts are connected.  Then again, there shouldn't be anything on bitcointalk capable of even making me blink after being here so long.  Master-P, anyone?
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 11, 2023, 07:02:43 PM
#92
Some highly respected members seem to think that aTriZ = Zapo and I know Jamal owns the aTriZ account so 1 could conclude they are all 3 owned by the same person IMO.

True, but the three threads get bogged down in discussions at one point concerning when ownership transfer occurrs.

Quote
All 3 accounts are already tagged so you having yours there or not doesn't really make a huge difference. I guess to those that directly trust you I suppose. I can respect you wanting your feedbacks to be accurate though.

After consideration, I've amended my previous trust feedback to now read:

Timelord2067    2023-11-12    Reference    It would appear Zapo is jamalaezaz through their shared connection to aTriz - see ref link for clarification. (Delete)

Feel free to point out if this (or any) are wrong.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 4554
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
November 11, 2023, 06:30:35 PM
#91
Sorry to necro bump this, but the My Apology to Bitcoin Community and Request for another Chance thread started by jamalaezaz is locked and the aTriz account has most likely changed hands thread started by Cashi was last active 2018-10-04

My question is if aTriz and jamalaezaz are alts, does that mean Zapo is jamalaezaz ?  There are no Flags against Zapo and the two aforementioned threads aren't clear about the co-ownership.
Some highly respected members seem to think that aTriZ = Zapo and I know Jamal owns the aTriZ account so 1 could conclude they are all 3 owned by the same person IMO.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/confession-zapo-atriz-5043497

Does it matter?

Indirectly it does.  

I've been reviewing (yet again  Roll Eyes ) my trust feedbacks to ensure they are accurate and saw both names and noticed the two connections.
All 3 accounts are already tagged so you having yours there or not doesn't really make a huge difference. I guess to those that directly trust you I suppose. I can respect you wanting your feedbacks to be accurrate though.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 11, 2023, 06:25:35 PM
#90
Does it matter?

Indirectly it does. 

I've been reviewing (yet again  Roll Eyes ) my trust feedbacks to ensure they are accurate and saw both names and noticed the two connections.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6320
Crypto Swap Exchange
November 11, 2023, 10:36:10 AM
#89
Sorry to necro bump this, but the My Apology to Bitcoin Community and Request for another Chance thread started by jamalaezaz is locked and the aTriz account has most likely changed hands thread started by Cashi was last active 2018-10-04

My question is if aTriz and jamalaezaz are alts, does that mean Zapo is jamalaezaz ?  There are no Flags against Zapo and the two aforementioned threads aren't clear about the co-ownership.

Does it matter? https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zapo-2015835
Bunch of negative trust and has not been here in over 4 years.

Is there other drama someplace that I missed that brought this up?
If not then I would just file it in the whatever, not important pile.

-Dave
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 11, 2023, 06:51:03 AM
#88
Sorry to necro bump this, but the My Apology to Bitcoin Community and Request for another Chance thread started by jamalaezaz is locked and the aTriz account has most likely changed hands thread started by Cashi was last active 2018-10-04

My question is if aTriz and jamalaezaz are alts, does that mean Zapo is jamalaezaz ?  There are no Flags against Zapo and the two aforementioned threads aren't clear about the co-ownership.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1166
🤩Finally Married🤩
April 22, 2019, 01:23:48 AM
#87
aTriz is back, but why not Zapo?

Although he leaves us this message:
This account was my last straw,...

...

Well, for the future, I’ll continue activities on this account, and keep attempting being the person I strive to be. I won’t exit scam with escrow funds, or work with any scam ICOs, or anything shady, but I think it’s already too late for me to make a return. I’ll remain in the community, hopefully for the best, and I’ll ask for a second chance, but I’m pretty I’ll be bright red after this.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/atrizs-bounty-and-signature-campaign-managment-services-available-2232934

(I just bumped this thread for I know this is the right section to discuss it)
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 3060
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
October 13, 2018, 05:47:12 AM
#86
Shame. He was pretty much the only "new" campaign manager who came here and was doing what he should have been by checking and denying participants due to quality, but something didn't seem right because of that because it's such an anomaly. I even thought about leaving him positive trust because of it but glad I didn't now.

I think we should probably be more weary of 'new' campaign managers here because they're often trusted with a lot of money and I'm sure many of them will just be building up for some long con or siphon off money to their alts (as some have already been caught doing).
full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 166
October 12, 2018, 12:55:48 PM
#85
I still don't see connection between pinkman12345 and snakey because everything is very confusing.

These people love to keep things confusing, its pretty much part of the MO.



I simply came to see what  the lying asshole is at again...


He posted earlier that all of this is the truth in response to me; now where have we heard this before Wink

legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
October 06, 2018, 01:49:30 PM
#84
-Snip-
The team was currently flying over to dubai for a lot of meetings, so please give me and them some leeway.

Your escrow has been shit, maybe because the "team" wanted to minimize their exposure to you (because they knew), maybe because you just suck at it, maybe both..
Friday - Didn't bother asking the devs to refill the escrow upholding my obligation as a trusted escrow since I was quite busy irl, so didn't bother.
ftfy
The "escrow" is often sitting underbudget and therefore not protecting participants at all. It's not really even an "escrow", the "team" is just giving you funds to divvy out as needed, not even as needed..
It seems you had about 0.26 in "escrow" for a few days recently but the transactions are such a mess.. Coming from exchange hot wallets and using change addresses - mess..

You should have stuck with the signed escrow address in the OP to keep it TRANSPARENT and simple for all to confirm the campaign is ACTUALLY under escrow, which it is not anyway.. Use a consistent escrow address would ya? You didn't sign any of those other ones did ya? We have no idea who owns outputs to random addresses..
Currently your escrow is negative what, .25 btc? From what I can make of it..

The escrow in the OP is just a ploy to start the campaign and goes right out the window once participants sign up..
Since YOU are the "escrow" if that campaign scams right now it is YOUR fault. Money out of your pocket you owe them because you promised you were protecting the participants from the "team" via escrow.. You have placed that burden upon yourself..
I have mentioned your escrow a couple of times and I think you just don't want to admit that you aren't holding shit anyway..  

"Leeway"? Are you guys running a professional business or just winging it?

"Flying to Dubai" is more important than keeping their word? More important than paying their employees? Plane don't have wifi?
I didn't look into it but, are they really "flying to Dubai"? If they are willing to blow their commitment to you, and their employees, off - blow you all off because they are on a plane, do you really think it is a good idea for you to bear the burden of payments for them by being the "escrow" when you have no funds?

No way I would put myself in the position of "escrow" and let it ride with one party not fulfilling their obligation, risk my neck for all those funds..
No way, especially if I didn't have the funds to cover my vouch.
Much less taking out a large loan I couldn't repay and bearing the financial responcibility for some flake "team" flying to dubai, at the same time..

You must be seriously desperate for that job to risk your financial neck to them like that, or more likely risk your name AGAIN and risking the participants financials..  

I'm not incorrect. It did take a lot of planning and talking.
Sure isn't the whole truth now is it? Leaving out the exact details he was getting at weren't ya?
If you didn't want the world to know you should have PM'd him the truth..

It was a lot of months since my last lending applications.

Dude...
You just asked for a 1BTC loan less than a month prior!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.45276131
http://archive.is/1pdLo since you like deleting similar shit
September 06, 2018, 06:00:57 AM
I'll be converting the BTC into USD for the purpose of paying bills and making purchases, but I will be paid a set BTC amount by my employers, so this is why I'm asking for this loan tied to BTC.

I'm more than happy to re-negotiate loan terms, making everyone happy.
Negotiate HIGHER than 33.333% interest?
Then you are going to pay bills and buy things.. Not very sustainable.. Very confident in your income from "employers" and ability to repay the loan..  

And now..
half me sort of desperate.

Are you desperate to buy things like some Black Friday wackjob consumer addict?
You didn't tell those lenders you were desperate did you?
That was all you just being some actor.. Some anon alias, playing the part..
You admit misrepresenting a lot in your lending applications..

Are you desperate for money to survive? Are you confident enough in your financials to spend 1BTC on a large purchase on credit? Are you that desperate to buy things?
Choose one..  

What are you going to do when you get even more desperate?
Which is likely.. You really are willing to skate on thin ice wanting a large loan to buy things while holding a negative balance "escrow"..


I ran a lending buisness
not knowing how high-interest rates are on bitcointalk


These RECENT ACTIONS are plenty for me, regardless of old Atriz drama with snakey or other, that "Kevin" is not a highly trustworthy individual..
Not to say that I think he is going to exit scam a campaign, a large loan, or both.. But his word is no good..
A person's WORD to me is more important than "have held large funds"..

The last person you should lie to, or misrepresent facts to (at best), are potential creditors.. IMO


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Lets dig into this part..

Hi Bitcointalk, I'm looking for a loan with these terms,
I found the public has access only to the following address where you held fund:
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/17wW3y8HgcRACw6e8wjB5bkuc1CFJzvRQM
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/14cJEUeGm157ok88ouskfDGwbSmzf2Kgcr
Total 1.76BTC
Hi zazarb,
I didn't bother with changing the escrow address weekly, because of the wallet I use changes addresses everytime I send a TXID. For example, here is a TXID thats not from an address listed in the OP.

Both addresses zazarb quotes held some funds from 8-8 until 8-16 and 8-18..
Which convienently coorelates with the openings of both campaigns BQT and IOU..
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/iou-true-p2p-e-commerce-loyalty-platform-on-blockchain-4845370
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ended-bqt-signature-campaign-member-hero-00007-btc-post-4862272

Like I said earlier, just a PLOY to start the campaigns and then the "escrow" goes right out the window..
They are also what he uses as reference for being so trusted.. "I held those funds I'm super trusty"

BUT, zapo's reply with...
Shit multi TX from a hot wallet for 1, he should have linked to https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/address/1AKwj14zZfGPcbXkJE7iVF8hLctrMjRhJF ..
It only held funds for 14 hours, which is NOT "escrow"..

STOP calling it "escrow", it is merely fund distribution..  Unless you are guaranteeing payment out of your own pocket, which you can't afford, and then it's still not "escrow", but a guarantee vouch..

Payment Details

Escrow Address - 17wW3y8HgcRACw6e8wjB5bkuc1CFJzvRQM

Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Zapo confirming that I am holding 0.7 BTC for the IOU signature campaign (first week). This address should be topped up weekly.
17wW3y8HgcRACw6e8wjB5bkuc1CFJzvRQM
Hxf/fLeKYzb/Zf+4PdBMwNv1oyqvgidu61j+Lx0P+CYUGTBOZQnsAEn6qkRh/D12yuohJ7wPuPhPyo+T+LQ5qzk=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Escrow Address - 14cJEUeGm157ok88ouskfDGwbSmzf2Kgcr
Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Zapo confirming that I am holding 0.7 BTC for the BQT signature campaign (first week). This address should be topped up weekly.
14cJEUeGm157ok88ouskfDGwbSmzf2Kgcr
Hz53nUWZzrzi5ICkpcWqeefToEQramEFdfpzvMWhYLPhSyucpKoW7iTyKYh0AzTy5TjGXr1KADAa2wAFtU7NE+U=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

"Topped up weekly" - lol        Didn't bother.. Should yeah if it was really an escrow, but it's not..
The signed messages are not even proof that zapo held those funds.. It is not an old known address of his..

Just as he was "forced" to continue a scam campaign because he had 2 weeks invested in it, now he is "forced" to continue as a fraudulent "escrow"..

I would tell the "team" to fulfill their escrow obligations as promised or fuck right off, but I'm not desperate to make money from Bitcointalk, and who knows what the agreement really is between zapo and the "team"..
full member
Activity: 330
Merit: 123
October 06, 2018, 01:18:08 PM
#83
I still don't see connection between pinkman12345 and snakey because everything is very confusing.


These people love to keep things confusing, its pretty much part of the MO.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
October 06, 2018, 10:56:58 AM
#82
Alright, please don't leak.
Ok. PM received and deleted.

So there is some kind of evidence that might be true or maybe not, however it doesn't show proof when aTriz bought account.

Quote
I must say I'm surprised that you ever sent along your private key to anyone. I can see why you made this extreme error in judgement considering you were making attempts to repay a defrauded investor.
Defrauded investor has tried to scam aTriz sending him fake tokens as collateral loan. I posted this somewhere in one of the topics earlier.

I still don't see connection between pinkman12345 and snakey because everything is very confusing.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 2037
October 06, 2018, 09:11:56 AM
#81
Well thanks for taking the time to fill in the gaps for me.

I must say I'm surprised that you ever sent along your private key to anyone. I can see why you made this extreme error in judgement considering you were making attempts to repay a defrauded investor.

You have the right to make your own decisions regarding repayment and what you feel is right. Taking the hurt feelings out of the equation though, despite them (assuming all connections made are accurate and true) snakey/pinkman12345 lightening your wallet for you; they did not steal above and beyond what you originally said you would pay back. Which I still feel was a big move, and owning responsibility for your lack of due diligence. *

All I can say is that I don't distrust you. I also wouldn't fully trust in anything you are apart of... there are very few people whom I would. I feel I've met your type before in that the details can get lost in the shuffle and that at times you are trying to handle to much; again maybe that's a product of how your spring turned out. Apart from the forum I don't know what you've been through, but there are definitely things that you dropped the ball on here that compounded your problems. Moving forward, try acting like the newbie you came back as for these 2 main points.

Escrow your funds - While it doesn't build your trust of holding funds and distributing them, it shows your willing to do the work with out the potential of funds missing. This could have been useful in the cases of tokens going missing, and in light of it being shown you trusted the wrong person with your private keys so recently put others at ease. Ensuring your employers provide these funds at the beginning of a round will also make it smoother if/when they want to cut payouts down, this way you can pay everyone on time and keep things transparent.

Feedback - It's tough to go back a few months and say this is how things went down when we have a system in place to document and track scams/or other untrustworthy behavior. I feel you should have done this with the whole Pinkman/Snakey. Might have even prevented others from getting ripped off as you appear to have been the first under the Pinkman banner. You could have also tied the alts together if the proof holds up to scrutiny.

Good luck, with your endeavors. I do believe you can come back from this just take your time, and when in doubt maybe think " If I post this on the forum for all to see... will I be run out of town?"



Glad to see you are providing information going forward for those trying to recoup their default loans from Pinkman.

* Adding to the above, if you do plan to move forward with reimbursement to meet the originally agreed upon total. I don't see an issue with having this hashed out between you, Snakey/Pinkam, and the 2 lenders who have outstanding defaulted loans before any distribution of funds takes place. This all assumes the proof of alts is definitive, conversation is all open and above board between the 5/4 parties. Not my money just my thoughts.

copper member
Activity: 224
Merit: 156
Stay Dangerous!
October 06, 2018, 07:17:33 AM
#80
I have, but I don't see why it's neccassary. All the money I made off Chroynos, plus an extra 3 eth is all gone.


Nothing in life is necessary.  But if you want to fix something that's broke, you have to make an effort.

You didn't earn this money the hard way, and just because you were scammed shouldn't prevent you from making right another scam.

Remember what I said earlier, ill gotten gains never go far...

Edit:
You didn't deny this in our telegram convo yesterday, Sander Patt.


Pls post screenshots of your conv so we can also see that pinkman12345 = snakey (sander patt on telegram).
Alright, I'll do it when I have time. He didn't deny or confirm it, but if you have talked to JH on tg before, it's quite obvious you are talking to the same person. I'm pissed at myself that I didn't get this earlier.

I can easily do that. Can you/suchmoon/The Pharmacist PM me? I have information which proves that, but I'd like not to be public.
Send me PM.

Quote
Had 3 ETH stuck in bread wallet, and there were issues with sending ETH at the time, so I gave my private key to JH, and asked him to help me fix it. A day later, JH says he can't fix it, and my 3 eth disappeared, into some shapeshift address. I asked JH about it, he said I couldn't access wallet, so I believed him, and since he was my friend, didn't bother any more.

Let me see if I got this right.
3 ethereum stuck in wallet, you asked someone for help, they said they can't fix it and your ethereum magically disappeared? You have to be kidding me!  Cheesy

Can you post transaction ID?

Ok, I think I have to update this topic https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/rakeshdobar1-is-alt-of-engg-chakks-3062663 with some newer information.
Alright, please don't leak.

Gonna shift through my email and try login in my bread wallet to find TXID and my angry email to bread support about getting hacked.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
October 06, 2018, 07:11:16 AM
#79
Very interesting how LoyceV find out your previous account.
I can share that story Cheesy
It started when I merited this post (with LoyceMobile).
What got my attention, is that Zapo posted a (zoomed in) screenshot of it:
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/heisenberghunter-1564795
Post Count: 295+1
Merit Count: 104
BTC Address: 15j7YNczxPnuTUYEufWTu2nKbSvK2TyMEh
Telegram Username: @Heisenberg_Hunter

All the 104 merits were received by me for the posts I made, none of them were airdropped like the spammers who own a shit ton of free airdropped merits.

Alright, looks like you are in! Smiley
I didn't expect a 4 month old fairly new Campaign Manager to know me. The use of the word "Alright" triggered me too, I've seen that used by aTriz in the same way.

Recognizing me and my alt was confirmed the next day:
Quote from: Heisenberg_Hunter
-snip
I think that's not the case there,  you we're accepted with the help of Merit from LoyceV/LoyceMobile,

As we all know LoyceV is a well known here for his/her quality posts that is beneficial to this forum and,
I think with that, it is already a proof that you have done well and it helped the Manager to conduct a fair decision.
My Merit doesn't mean I agree with a post, it also doesn't mean I endorse a post. It means I think the post is worth reading, and in this case Heisenberg_Hunter made a good point. Someone who received 0 airdrop and earned 104 Merit shouldn't be excluded if the requirement is 100 airdrop + 20 earned Merit. The requirement is based on the assumption that barely anyone ranked up thanks to Merit. That was valid right after Merit was introduced, but nowadays more and more people rank up on their own.
I didn't accept him/her purely on your merit, it's just that it was surpising to see your alt merit a signature post and I made an exception. His posts are of great quality anyway and he would have been accepted even if you didn't merit the post.
Add the fact that a relatively new user started managing 2 Bitcoin-paying signatures campaigns with high rates, and the fact that Zapo was created just 3 days after aTriz received his first red trust, and it became very likely to be aTriz.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
October 06, 2018, 06:29:42 AM
#78
I can easily do that. Can you/suchmoon/The Pharmacist PM me? I have information which proves that, but I'd like not to be public.
Send me PM.

Quote
Had 3 ETH stuck in bread wallet, and there were issues with sending ETH at the time, so I gave my private key to JH, and asked him to help me fix it. A day later, JH says he can't fix it, and my 3 eth disappeared, into some shapeshift address. I asked JH about it, he said I couldn't access wallet, so I believed him, and since he was my friend, didn't bother any more.

Let me see if I got this right.
3 ethereum stuck in wallet, you asked someone for help, they said they can't fix it and your ethereum magically disappeared? You have to be kidding me!  Cheesy

Can you post transaction ID?

Ok, I think I have to update this topic https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/rakeshdobar1-is-alt-of-engg-chakks-3062663 with some newer information.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1159
October 06, 2018, 01:15:49 AM
#77

That makes about as little sense as all the other excuses we've heard from the 2015-2018 aTriz (for lack of a better definition) so there is good chance that this is indeed the same person.

Here is what you could do: stop lying, get a job IRL, repay the loans or whatever you owe to whomever, stop fucking around with alts, and stay away from shady deals, or any financial responsibility for that matter (use an escrow if you must).

Here is what you will do: same as usual.

I have been here for sometime and saw the allegations about bitblisscoin, the alia drama and subsequent negging of aTriz. From those incidents, aTriz comes across as someone who wants to stay involved with BCT and campaign management. This is probably what leads to the painstaking effort he has put into ensuring professionalism with Zapo account.

People tend to resort to desperate actions for business when they are too involved. It is worrisome. In a decentralized marketplace, reputation is everything. Who decides on reputation? The subjective 'Trust' decisions lead to group-think and oligarchial strurctures. They even become meaningless for someone too big to fail. For example, in case of Quickseller. He supposedly has an army of alts and a -9999 rated account but does alright. (I mention QS purely as an academic interest. The account could be a case study in reputation and trust issues.)

I suppose it works just fine for QS. I suppose it should work just fine for aTriz/ Zapo too as long as they don't stray too far from the honest / Full disclosure path. More than anything else though, his quandary should give us a lesson as to what kind of ethical behavior to follow while doing business HERE. Not resorting to "doing whats necessary". This may get you short term results but in a decentralized marketplace, it has a non-zero chance of doing some non-zero damage to whatever RPG character you choose to play on here. Roll Eyes

Whether this inherent correcting nature of the market / RPG actually works or not depends on what kind of disincentive this creates for business-owners who choose to be casual with their dealings. For the long term, this is the most important takeaway. Other than that, I guess we also need an objective measurement of how "Number/severity of mistakes" reflects on "reputation."

PS: Zapo, Taking back the application. Thanks
full member
Activity: 330
Merit: 123
October 06, 2018, 12:25:32 AM
#76
I have, but I don't see why it's neccassary. All the money I made off Chroynos, plus an extra 3 eth is all gone.


Nothing in life is necessary.  But if you want to fix something that's broke, you have to make an effort.

You didn't earn this money the hard way, and just because you were scammed shouldn't prevent you from making right another scam.

Remember what I said earlier, ill gotten gains never go far...

Edit:
You didn't deny this in our telegram convo yesterday, Sander Patt.


Pls post screenshots of your conv so we can also see that pinkman12345 = snakey (sander patt on telegram).
Pages:
Jump to: