Pages:
Author

Topic: Copycat Signatures: Chipmixer and Wasabi - page 4. (Read 1891 times)

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
While i agree there's ethical problem, IMO it's problem between ChipMixer and the user who wear copycat signature, all we need to do is let ChipMixer representative know about this problem.

Wasabi is not a profitable service

While i doubt it's profitable, there's 0.003% coordinator fee.

According to Chainalysis, Wasabi mixed $250,000,000 in 2019*. That means $750,000 has been paid in coordinator fees, which seems pretty profitably to me Grin.

$250 million times 0.003% is $7500. OTOH the 0.003% fee is per anonymity set and Wasabi uses 50+ sets by default, so it's a 0.15% minimum total fee, usually higher. $400-500k would be a more reasonable estimate, but that's just the revenue. There are costs/expenses for sure.

At any rate, I'd say nopara73 claiming that he makes money is good enough to assume there is profit, and I'm sure he could pay for a signature if he wanted to, and I'm quite sure he's not paying for Gyrsur's copypasta signature.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
While i agree there's ethical problem, IMO it's problem between ChipMixer and the user who wear copycat signature, all we need to do is let ChipMixer representative know about this problem.

Wasabi is not a profitable service

While i doubt it's profitable, there's 0.003% coordinator fee.
According to Chainalysis, Wasabi mixed $250,000,000 in 2019*. That means $750,000 has been paid in coordinator fees, which seems pretty profitably to me Grin.
*source: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/chainalysis-most-mixed-bitcoin-not-used-for-illicit-purposes
While I am quite surprised (I have underestimated Wasabi), I am not able to follow your math. 0.003% is per anonymity set ($7500 assuming all went through a set of 1). On average, the set I would say is in the 50-75 on average.

Regarding the OP, I don't really see the issue as long as it is an individual using the signature (in a non-campaign way). It would've been honorable if the user PMed the signature designer first, but you can't prevent people from using the BB code. Campaigns could add a disclaimer in the OP but there would still be no way to enforce it.
Translation: Some theft is okay, some other theft is not okay.


legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
While i agree there's ethical problem, IMO it's problem between ChipMixer and the user who wear copycat signature, all we need to do is let ChipMixer representative know about this problem.

Wasabi is not a profitable service

While i doubt it's profitable, there's 0.003% coordinator fee.

According to Chainalysis, Wasabi mixed $250,000,000 in 2019*. That means $750,000 has been paid in coordinator fees, which seems pretty profitably to me Grin.

Regarding the OP, I don't really see the issue as long as it is an individual using the signature (in a non-campaign way). It would've been honorable if the user PMed the signature designer first, but you can't prevent people from using the BB code. Campaigns could add a disclaimer in the OP but there would still be no way to enforce it.

*source: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/chainalysis-most-mixed-bitcoin-not-used-for-illicit-purposes

EDIT:  Lips sealed
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
What do you think?
If it's plagiarism, it's up to the Mods to deal with. I don't even know if Global Mods can do that, or only Admins.
No. That is post plagiarism. Signature design plagiarism is theft that has been dealt with the trust system.
Forum rules apply to signatures as well. We shouldn't use the trust system for either kind of plagiarism unless the staff explicitly refuse to take action and there is an actual risk involved, e.g. the user is promoting a scam.
We have always acted using the trust system, and there is no reason to stop doing so. Forum rules if applicable are an added bonus.

Right, not profitable for any campaign then.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
What do you think?
If it's plagiarism, it's up to the Mods to deal with. I don't even know if Global Mods can do that, or only Admins.
No. That is post plagiarism. Signature design plagiarism is theft that has been dealt with the trust system.

Forum rules apply to signatures as well. We shouldn't use the trust system for either kind of plagiarism unless the staff explicitly refuse to take action and there is an actual risk involved, e.g. the user is promoting a scam.

Wasabi is not a profitable service

While i doubt it's profitable, there's 0.003% coordinator fee.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/emq3hv/ama_im_nopara73_i_wrote_65_of_the_code_of_wasabi/

Loading...
Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
While i agree there's ethical problem, IMO it's problem between ChipMixer and the user who wear copycat signature, all we need to do is let ChipMixer representative know about this problem.
No. It our problem.

Wasabi is not a profitable service
While i doubt it's profitable, there's 0.003% coordinator fee.
That is irrelevant.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
It goes beyond copyright, it goes to the heart of what is also morally correct or not.

To use/steal/copy is one thing but to not even accept that you did something wrong is another thing - that is why the user wearing the copycat signature should explain why he did it and what the story is behind it.

It is funny to see people are doing stuff like this.
My question is are any of this specific signatures copyright protected or not?
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 672
But it is obviously a clickbait. Using someone's else design to promote similarly service is conscious deception. The low marketing budget is not enough justification.

Not entirely through, everyone could have a similar design compared to what you have as really I don't think people can create an entirely unique design. The only problem here with the "ChipMixer" being edited out and replacing it to "Wasabi Wallet" they haven't replaced the logo of ChipMixer in the signature which is protected by their trademark. As far as Wasabi Wallet being promoted, I haven't seen any real activity from them in the forum so this might just be an individual trying to promote a competitor from ChipMixer and used their signature to be used in promoting Wasabi Wallet.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
What do you think?
If it's plagiarism, it's up to the Mods to deal with. I don't even know if Global Mods can do that, or only Admins.
No. That is post plagiarism. Signature design plagiarism is theft that has been dealt with the trust system.

As for the parody:
Quote from: Google Dictionary
an imitation of the style of a particular writer, artist, or genre with deliberate exaggeration for comic effect.
I guess I just don't see the comical value for Vadi2323's signature on a Bitcoin forum where many users value their privacy.
Correct. This is why I think my previous opinion is wrong. That particular case is simple, but some other cases might be very difficult: e.g. something that may be funny to some but not to others. Easier if the consensus was just: Do not do it.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
What do you think?
If it's plagiarism, it's up to the Mods to deal with. I don't even know if Global Mods can do that, or only Admins.

As for the parody:
Quote from: Google Dictionary
an imitation of the style of a particular writer, artist, or genre with deliberate exaggeration for comic effect.
I guess I just don't see the comical value for Vadi2323's signature on a Bitcoin forum where many users value their privacy.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
I think this should not be allowed either because it is plagiarism, the intended use is irrelevant.
What made you change your mind?

@DarkStar_ Is Vadi2323's plagiarm on the signature design allowed?
Unless you think that Vadi2323 is actually promoting terrorism, this is either parody (may be fair use) or satire (probably not fair use). Given that Vadi2323 seems to be ridiculing the Chipmixer campaign itself - it could be considered parody. On the other hand, he could be targeting privacy/anonymization in general, in which case it's more of a satire. IANAL.
This.
Good quote. I am not sure that my previous agreement with this stance was the right decision. There can be so many edge-cases because of that. I think it would be much simpler if we uniformly disallow any kind of plagiarism/copying and modifying. If somebody wants to make a parody, then let them make their own design(?). What do you think?
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I think this should not be allowed either because it is plagiarism, the intended use is irrelevant.
What made you change your mind?
@DarkStar_ Is Vadi2323's plagiarm on the signature design allowed?
Unless you think that Vadi2323 is actually promoting terrorism, this is either parody (may be fair use) or satire (probably not fair use). Given that Vadi2323 seems to be ridiculing the Chipmixer campaign itself - it could be considered parody. On the other hand, he could be targeting privacy/anonymization in general, in which case it's more of a satire. IANAL.
This.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
How about this?


AFAIK I never saw anyone complain about the profile owner plagiarizing or copying chipmixer's signature design despite being around for a while now or is the wasabi issue a special case?
I think this should not be allowed either because it is plagiarism, the intended use is irrelevant.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
February 29, 2020, 07:21:00 PM
#23
Didn't we do this a few weeks ago?  Can't recall - was it YoBit?  Who is the signature campaign manager that is doing this?  Surely the designer of the actual signature code should be made aware that their design has been modified without authorisation.  At any rate, many thanks for making this plagiarism known.
copper member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1305
Limited in number. Limitless in potential.
February 29, 2020, 06:39:44 PM
#22
This stuff is related between the designer and the non-signature participant who uses the signature without the designer's permission IMO.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
February 29, 2020, 06:21:48 PM
#21
It is funny to see people are doing stuff like this.
My question is are any of this specific signatures copyright protected or not?

legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
February 29, 2020, 04:11:21 PM
#20
How about this?


AFAIK I never saw anyone complain about the profile owner plagiarizing or copying chipmixer's signature design despite being around for a while now or is the wasabi issue a special case?
As far as I know there is no special case as such to single out Wasabi, I know very little about them. In the case related to this thread, I saw a Chipmixer copycat signature today so queried it. I do not recall seeing the copy signature you posted about before.


AFAIK I never saw anyone complain about the profile owner plagiarizing or copying chipmixer's signature design despite being around for a while now or is the wasabi issue a special case?
It was discussed in the campaign thread.
I must have missed the whole chat because I think I never posted in that campaign thread to date, but hope to post there in future.
hero member
Activity: 1659
Merit: 687
LoyceV on the road. Or couch.
February 29, 2020, 03:49:59 PM
#19
AFAIK I never saw anyone complain about the profile owner plagiarizing or copying chipmixer's signature design despite being around for a while now or is the wasabi issue a special case?
It was discussed in the campaign thread.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1822
Top Crypto Casino
February 29, 2020, 03:44:18 PM
#18
How about this?


AFAIK I never saw anyone complain about the profile owner plagiarizing or copying chipmixer's signature design despite being around for a while now or is the wasabi issue a special case?
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
February 29, 2020, 12:56:25 PM
#17
Wahabi wallet
You might want to edit this.
Pages:
Jump to: