Topic: Coronavirus Outbreak - page 32. (Read 29723 times)

It will end when everyone is vaccinated.  Including the anti-vaxxers and other 'freedom fighters'.


If this virus is not eradicated quickly, we are looking at new mutations, not just variants but possibly new strains, which will require new vaccinations.  From what we know, viruses mutated under stress are usually more contagious and deadly.

We are looking at wearing masks for the rest of our lives if we don't eradicate this virus NOW.

This corona virus really makes us scared, worry and make everyone sick, physically, emotionally, mentally and even socially, can't imagine the wide effect of this "worldwide Pandemic" millions of people are now dying, economics are all low and Media news really worsen the situation. we still don't know when would this end and what will happen to all of us after if this continue.

Disclaimer: above juz sum shit I heard while fallin off ze bar stool 

We 'conspiracy theorist' knew all this shit, and a lot more, for a long time.  Over a year in a lot of cases.  The people describing the issues have been banished from social media platforms, but they can still be followed for people who care to do so.

The shit is about to come out so mainstream is trying to do damage control by guiding the peep's perceptions and trying desperately to make it look like they are a little bit more useful than tits on a boar hog.  What a joke.

The theory that it escaped from a lab might reasonable. But that would be giving the lab people too much credit. It was more like they were following Fauci orders to eject it.

The theory that COVID-19 escaped from a lab may not be so far-fetched
https://nypost.com/2021/05/09/theory-that-covid-escaped-from-a-lab-may-not-be-far-fetched/

says the guy advertising atleast a half a dozen products..
says the guy crying about not being able to play golf or eat bacon

so how can you pretend thins are normal whilst simultaneously ranting about something
if it didnt exist.. what would you be ranting about.. cloud seeding. lizard aliens?

if it didnt exist. would this topic even have been created?

Right! It would have been reasonable if there had been an emergency. But the fact that anybody believed there was one is really stupid... on a bunch of levels.

Quite impressive how many levels of stupid you're able to pack into just one sentence.

Vaccines only have emergency authorization how can they still be used if no longer a state of emergency?
https://web.archive.org/web/20210507163135/https://kfor.com/news/local/governor-stitt-withdraws-oklahoma-covid-19-state-of-emergency-declaration/

seems like a angry guy that doesnt like it that for the last year he has not been able to brainwash his flock inside a church where he can intimidate people into handing over donations to him..

funy part is . while making a videocall on his cellphone(5g) he wants to say how dangerous 5G is

thats like saying how breathing air is dangerous without suffocating
thats like saying how water is poison while taking a bath
thats like saying all food will kill while talking with his mouth full

..
so what i see is a guy that loves to brainwash people for money. just using a different platform than his usual stage. and then try to blame a natural disaster on the platform he chose to use

so yes in this case 5G is dangerous. as it allows idiot influencers to brainwash more idiots

Catholic Priest in Rome Exposes COVID Scamdemic
https://rumble.com/vc3jdp-catholic-priest-in-rome-exposes-covid-scamdemic.html

There is no actual proof that this guy actually was speaking in spring 2020:

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/TWYZcmEt2d7s/
  Clip From Spring 2020 (Is this guy Nostradamus?)

I don't really doubt it though because I was saying more or less the same thing by early summer (based both on my own analysis and the analysis of others who I've come to respect.)

In case someone missed the video of the last post (with Attorney Dr Reiner Fuellmich)
https://blazingpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/nV6v5JKnY1JT.mp4?_=1


Covid passports banned, happy July 4

you have no clue

you dont simple accept or reject civil law.
by you being within the borders of a country you are bound to its civil law.

EG whilst in america .. no alcohol until your 21. yet get on a plane to the UK and you can drink at 18.
you cant as a brit travel to america and think UK law still applies to allow you to drink at 18 in america

heck. if a brit drove forward on the left side of the road from his prospective in america. thats breaking the law
if an american drove on the right side of the road in the UK thats breaking the law

when you can finally understand jurisdictions. you might learn something

and no you are not even significant enough to be endowed with diplomatic immunity. and no its not something you can award yourself with

That's where you are always going to miss it. Legal and lawful are almost always different. Either legal doesn't cover enough of what is lawful, or legal goes way past lawful with silly stuff that isn't lawful.

If there was legal or not at the Nuremberg trials, there was sufficient amount of lawful. And that is what the trials were based on... lawful, but maybe, or not, legal as well.

The legalness of the Germans who did unlawful, murderous things in WW2 (legal but not lawful), was not enough to save them from the retribution of breaking the common law by obeying the legal.

In the States and the UK, the foundational laws and foundational documents are always common law, even though they might be adopted as civil law, as well. This means that orders to murder that are legal, can be unlawful at the same time. It's a difficult thing to show in court, but the simple way is that the civil laws are made by man, just like the common law laws are and are not.

That's why there is such a thing as ACCEPTANCE in both US and UK laws. If you have or have not signed up to be under the legal law, you are still under the common law laws. And if you have not signed up to be under the legal laws, you don't have to ACCEPT being under them. But everybody is naturally under the common law laws because they exist in part, through natural law.

Consider "Maxims of Law - from - Bouvier's 1856 Law Dictionary" - https://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/bouvier/maxims.shtml. These are foundational law, even though they may be repeated in some natural law and some legal law. They are also used in Nuremberg, but maybe not entirely in the way they are written in Bouvier's. And they are the form of the way police brutality and legal-but-not-lawful Covid law enforcers are going to be punished.

there are no nuremburg legal proceedings
tash is showing a conspiracy site writing waffle and them pleading for someone to start something

in short nothing happened just cries of wanting other people to do it

W.H.O. AND C.D.C. – THE NEW NUREMBERG TRIALS 2021 [CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY]
A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts lead by Dr. Reiner Fullmich have begun legal proceedings over the CDC, WHO, the Davos Group for crimes against humanity.
https://blazingpress.com/w-h-o-and-c-d-c-the-new-nuremberg-trials-2021-crimes-against-humanity-please-share-this-info/
Spread the truth

Kinda like a black hole. All that stuff held together by gravity in a mathematical point... a mathematical point, a place where two or more 'things' meet, having no existence, itself.

Oops! I just let a secret out about black holes and viruses, didn't I? Both of them - black holes and viruses - things that don't exist... at least not in any way that science talks about them.

its too small/your hands are too big.