firstly in 2018 was a higher year than usual but it only had 61k not 80k(get your numbers right)
secondly 2019 was a normal year of just ~36k (2017:38k 2016:26k)
but lets use actual facts of actual 61k for 2018. seeing as you picked the 2018 year
here is the funny thing.. there are 160k deaths of flu and covid this year SO FAR (only 5 months in). meaning even if you deduct a 'normal flu' number of 61k that still has ~100k to explain
and these numbers are just preliminary and are ~a month out of date
it truly is funny how your rebuttals cant even get the numbers right. so ofcourse YOUR numbers are BS. because YOUR the one making up BS
.. 80k ha so funny.
also. you need to realise that even with self isolation impeding the spread. the numbers of covid deaths is still high. then wrap your head around that more deaths and more hospitalisations would occur without self isolation
as shown by the INCREASE of people positive of covid and more hospital beds filled with such people. compared to april. (when lockdown was fully active)
self isolation relaxes. infections increase = common sense
What? Exactly 160k? And they were 100% sure all those deaths were from flu or Covid?
All you have to do is go to the CDC's own standard wording to find that, even in happy times, nobody knows for sure what somebody dies of.
So, when you twist the numbers all out of shape because you have an agenda - like the people behind the medical do, and the CDC when they instruct people to call it Covid if they can get away with it - you get BS statistics that are scaring the heck out of loads of people.
But you like it this way, so you keep right on promoting the BS. Do you sit in your basement and laugh with glee every time you see riots from people who want to be free of the lockdowns?