For me corruption looks like this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5237622 send merit for what? Why it's not offtop?
And some advertising https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54125757
Topic: Corruption and prejudgment of the moderator Xandry (Read 1221 times)
Moreover I am member of signature campaigns as far as you noticed.
It is by the way one more example of your extraordinary transformation and change of the personality. You remember how you called those who participate in signature campaigns? I can remind you:Oh dear! This is worrisome. As an humanitarian worker I am appalled by Russia's lack of attention to humanitarian principles. Many people in need of humanitarian assistance will suffer because of this. Now that Russia is reportedly engaging in artillery fire with Ukranian forces, governments who have no interest in their duty of care to citizens in times of crisis, will have a pre-text to stop humanitarian convoys on suspicions of war-mongering. Good job EU! I hope it takes the spectacle of Russia flouting international law more seriously.
What is it? BitMixer whore's view?
Пpocтитyтки BITMIXER.IO в пoлитикe!
Where also unreasonably accused me of creation some flood bots.
Xandry you are disingenuous. I told you once and repeat again, I hate bots and multi-accounts who used signature compains, russian local board was full of this shit, especcially of "Bitmixer.io". You should have cleaned the forum of this, but you did not do it. That was my reason why I was not active last autumn.
I would ask you to stop talking nonsense about connected accounts. Pivo has never been of mine account, he is another person even with different political views. You know it since you have deleted lot of our posts in political threads. You are lying and mislead people now.
So I demand your apology and you must remove your negative feedback since you blamed me without solid evidence.
Now it is understandable why xandry is so prejudiced against these two comrades. Old grievances and revenge, using the position of a member of DT1 / DT2.
Moreover I am member of signature campaigns as far as you noticed.
It is by the way one more example of your extraordinary transformation and change of the personality. You remember how you called those who participate in signature campaigns? I can remind you:Oh dear! This is worrisome. As an humanitarian worker I am appalled by Russia's lack of attention to humanitarian principles. Many people in need of humanitarian assistance will suffer because of this. Now that Russia is reportedly engaging in artillery fire with Ukranian forces, governments who have no interest in their duty of care to citizens in times of crisis, will have a pre-text to stop humanitarian convoys on suspicions of war-mongering. Good job EU! I hope it takes the spectacle of Russia flouting international law more seriously.
What is it? BitMixer whore's view?
Пpocтитyтки BITMIXER.IO в пoлитикe!
Where also unreasonably accused me of creation some flood bots.
As you know trolling and flames are forbidden for members.
I don't see such rules for your signature campaign:Signature campaign
## Rules
1. This event starts from July 1, 2018 until December 23, 2018; you can joint at any time.
3. Participant requirements:
- Your bitcointalk account must be registered before June 25, 2018;
- Your bitcointalk account must have 10+ merits;
- You need to follow @semuxproject on Twitter;
- You need to make at least one new post every week on bitcointalk forum (we measure your posts point on Sunday);
- No spam/multi-account.
4. The rewards will be distributed to participants based on their merit scores:
- The reward allocation is 20,000 SEM per week;
- Payments are processed on Sunday.
5. We reserve the right to modify or cancel this event at any time. We reserve the right to refuse participants for any reason.
## Rules
1. This event starts from July 1, 2018 until December 23, 2018; you can joint at any time.
3. Participant requirements:
- Your bitcointalk account must be registered before June 25, 2018;
- Your bitcointalk account must have 10+ merits;
- You need to follow @semuxproject on Twitter;
- You need to make at least one new post every week on bitcointalk forum (we measure your posts point on Sunday);
- No spam/multi-account.
4. The rewards will be distributed to participants based on their merit scores:
- The reward allocation is 20,000 SEM per week;
- Payments are processed on Sunday.
5. We reserve the right to modify or cancel this event at any time. We reserve the right to refuse participants for any reason.
And you want to say what without paid signature trolling was allowed?
I probably also could not resist joking if someone English-speakers went to the Russian section.
It has nothing to do with Russian or English. It's your red-herring debate style that is ludicrous in any language.
So where's that confirmation of something or other that you (or the OP) were supposed to provide?
If you really knew the languages, then after reading the first post, as well as the topic referred to (OP), then no more stupid questions asked.
I probably also could not resist joking if someone English-speakers went to the Russian section.
It has nothing to do with Russian or English. It's your red-herring debate style that is ludicrous in any language.
So where's that confirmation of something or other that you (or the OP) were supposed to provide?
No problem. I understand his irony.
I probably also could not resist joking if someone English-speakers went to the Russian section.
I'm a moderator on another site. I speak very limited Russian but I try.
I know sometimes some the Russians poke fun at me. Sometimes it is clever and funny.
Some of the subtle sarcasm is very hard to detect.
I'm confused. I just read the part:
But…what if she lies?
But…what if she lies?
It happens when an opponent builds a translation relying on journals about intimate relationships
I gave Suchmoon merit because it is funny. I almost choked on my coffee when I read it.
In my opinion Suchmoon is one of the most entertaining quality posters on bitcointalk.
(also doesn't need any merit because they are a merit source and cannot rank up any further - so it is purely for the quality of the post)
In my opinion Suchmoon is one of the most entertaining quality posters on bitcointalk.
(also doesn't need any merit because they are a merit source and cannot rank up any further - so it is purely for the quality of the post)
No problem. I understand his irony.
I probably also could not resist joking if someone English-speakers went to the Russian section.
Where did you get that I do not like the comments?
My apologies. I misinterpreted this post:
No one is asking for encouragement. Just leave sellers alone.
Let me have another shot at it. Does it mean this:
https://www.marsvenus.com/blog/lauren-gray/what-leave-me-alone-actually-means-in-a-relationship
Quote
Meaning #1: “I’m very upset with you. You did something to piss me off and I’m not available for intimacy. It’s not going to be easy for you to make this better. You screwed up dude. You better fight to make it up to me.”
How do I make it up to you?
Once again, for those who can not calm down
THEME IS NOT ABOUT SELLERS! JUST LEAVE SELLERS ALONE!
I'm confused. I just read the part:
But…what if she lies?
By the way your post has received merits. Can I clarify for what?
I gave Suchmoon merit because it is funny. I almost choked on my coffee when I read it.
In my opinion Suchmoon is one of the most entertaining quality posters on bitcointalk.
(also doesn't need any merit because they are a merit source and cannot rank up any further - so it is purely for the quality of the post)
Where did you get that I do not like the comments?
My apologies. I misinterpreted this post:
No one is asking for encouragement. Just leave sellers alone.
Let me have another shot at it. Does it mean this:
https://www.marsvenus.com/blog/lauren-gray/what-leave-me-alone-actually-means-in-a-relationship
Quote
Meaning #1: “I’m very upset with you. You did something to piss me off and I’m not available for intimacy. It’s not going to be easy for you to make this better. You screwed up dude. You better fight to make it up to me.”
How do I make it up to you?
Once again, for those who can not calm down
THEME IS NOT ABOUT SELLERS! JUST LEAVE SELLERS ALONE!
By the way your post has received merits. Can I clarify for what?
Where did you get that I do not like the comments?
My apologies. I misinterpreted this post:
No one is asking for encouragement. Just leave sellers alone.
Let me have another shot at it. Does it mean this:
https://www.marsvenus.com/blog/lauren-gray/what-leave-me-alone-actually-means-in-a-relationship
Quote
Meaning #1: “I’m very upset with you. You did something to piss me off and I’m not available for intimacy. It’s not going to be easy for you to make this better. You screwed up dude. You better fight to make it up to me.”
How do I make it up to you?
All that is really useful, appeared when the forum consisted of enthusiasts.
I agree that the early forum was very different to the way it was now. It was very development focused from every angle. A huge amount of enthusiasm and innovation happened then.
It still happens but it is harder to find - between the regurgitated topics, bounty, ann and other spam topics.
It is progress...
But that is the nature of "mass adoption" of crypto. We are in the manic phase.
On some of the exchanges I trade we were chatting to the owner developers on an almost daily basis - just daily gossip. Two years later I can hardly get an email back from them because they are swamped with work. All development work is now handled by their many staff.
Developers have retreated because it is hard to deal with "the masses" of uninformed people riding the crypto mania wave. They have retreated to other methods of communication to extend their development work.
Black (red) in white says that sales are not prohibited! All the rest is advisory in nature.
If it were prohibited you'd be banned. But it's not prohibited so you're not banned, you just have an "advisory" on your trust profile.
No, you do not read me. I wrote to you in English that they do not discuss you or me here. My profile does not need anybody's recommendations.
Yet you're the one asking right here in this thread to
leave sellers alone
You (and other sellers) have the freedom to sell accounts and other members have the freedom to comment on your behavior. If you don't like this form of discouragement - it seems to be working.
Where did you get that I do not like the comments? I'm just wondering what will change if you tell everyone that I'm a salesman? If this is so open information.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_secret
I stressed that the topic is not about me. But if you want to leave a response, then I do not mind. It's your right.
Black (red) in white says that sales are not prohibited! All the rest is advisory in nature.
If it were prohibited you'd be banned. But it's not prohibited so you're not banned, you just have an "advisory" on your trust profile.
No, you do not read me. I wrote to you in English that they do not discuss you or me here. My profile does not need anybody's recommendations.
Yet you're the one asking right here in this thread to
leave sellers alone
You (and other sellers) have the freedom to sell accounts and other members have the freedom to comment on your behavior. If you don't like this form of discouragement - it seems to be working.
I am sure that they stopped doing it after mdayonliner's topic. At least the last one was 29 june. But several persons have got a lot of merit using this way. Personally I consider it like a fraud.
There is no ideal system. Personally I see some speculations in such case.
There is no ideal system. Personally I see some speculations in such case.
I understand that opinion.
Personally I think it was an experiment with good intention from the moderators. But it had potential for abuse and resulted in "industrial scale" reporting.
It was also flawed in the sense where it was open to abuse by people with bad intent. The moderators saw this and abandoned those methods.
I don't see a problem with trying something to see if it works and when it is pointed out that it had flaws they abandoned it. I think it shows initiative but also shows that they listened to the feedback objectively.
It also should be taken into account that the Ukraine and Russia are known spam locations and Russian trolls are among the worlds best.
With just two moderators on the largest local language board they have a big workload.
I still don't see why the "informers" and other "rascals" want merit - unless they are part of the account farming enterprise.
They like you are guided by the rules that sales are not recommended.
I'll summarize, and then apparently clumsy translation does not give a complete picture:
The system of extensions works only for the sake of the informers, sellers of merits and accounts, generators of 100500 meaningless messages (I cited an example) and other dubious personalities. Which do not benefit the community. That is, the only beneficiaries are the dregs of the community.
All that is really useful, appeared when the forum consisted of enthusiasts.
Ordinary sellers act as intermediaries. Farmers, those who create their own accounts, it is easier to buy merit. Or is the fact that Teymos, without knowing it himself, created an additional black market for Merit sales, is news for you too?
Snitchers are those who seek out sellers or buyers and complain about giving in the form of a merit.
So what you are saying is that the merit farmers sell merit to the account farmers which sell the accounts to the account sellers.
Just because the "subcontract" the merit farming - the account farmers are still the ones that want the merit.
If it is costing account farmers to by merit then the system is working - it means less accounts and the accounts will cost more.
It means the merit discouragement is working.
I still don't see why the "informers" and other "rascals" want merit - unless they are part of the account farming enterprise.
It is generally account farmers and bounty chasers that complain about the merit system. They are the only ones disadvantaged by it.
Let it be known to you that the "farmers of accounts" do not need merits for nothing.
What can not be said about informers and other rascals.
Perhaps you can explain that in further detail. This will be interesting.
Account farmers don't need merit to rank up their accounts so they can sell it for more ? So they can use those accounts in bounty and signature campaigns ?
What do the "rascals" and "informers" need the merits for ?
Ordinary sellers act as intermediaries. Farmers, those who create their own accounts, it is easier to buy merit. theymos, in fact, created an additional black market in order to sell merits.
Informers are looking for potential sellers or buyers, in the hope of receiving merits. That is, they do not bring any objective benefit.
I think if you read the link I posted much earlier - it was all discussed there. Using merit to reward spam reporters is no longer done by the Russian moderators because account farmers were abusing that method of awarding merit.
I am sure that they stopped doing it after mdayonliner's topic. At least the last one was 29 june. But several persons have got a lot of merit using this way. Personally I consider it like a fraud.
Quote
the merit system works as intended.
There is no ideal system. Personally I see some speculations in such case.
It is generally account farmers and bounty chasers that complain about the merit system. They are the only ones disadvantaged by it.
Let it be known to you that the "farmers of accounts" do not need merits for nothing.
What can not be said about informers and other rascals.
Perhaps you can explain that in further detail. This will be interesting.
Account farmers don't need merit to rank up their accounts so they can sell it for more ? So they can use those accounts in bounty and signature campaigns ?
What do the "rascals" and "informers" need the merits for ?
Jump to: