"Storj and Counterparty Partner to Add Support for Payment Channels"
Full story: http://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-blockchain-proof-of-concept-storj-and-counterparty-partner-to-add-support-for-payment-channels
Looks like these news gave another push to Counterparty and it's currently worth $4,31 (about $1,80 more since this thread was started).
Topic: Counterparty will make a killing. - page 4. (Read 5846 times)
I've been watching Counterparty (XCP) ever since this post and have seen it rise the last 3 days. They are having a meeting to discuss the EVM integration tomorrow, all are invited via Slack (counterparty.slack.com). I would assume the rise in price is related but not completely sure.
Well, the price rose with $0.95/coin for the past 16-17 days (since I started this thread). This I can call steady growth, but I'm not 100% sure that it will reach the price I tried to preddict.
I've been watching Counterparty (XCP) ever since this post and have seen it rise the last 3 days. They are having a meeting to discuss the EVM integration tomorrow, all are invited via Slack (counterparty.slack.com). I would assume the rise in price is related but not completely sure.
some bs....
Get a life.
Any news on XCP? It's up 30% at the moment, close to its 24 hour high.
Better check their thread, website or blog (if they have one). I am not (and I never did) hold any coins, nor following its development closely.
Any news on XCP? It's up 30% at the moment, close to its 24 hour high.
Actually I am gonna go away now.. not gonna get into this.
It's your choice to do it. I just shared
....snip
The technical weakness of CounterParty is that Bitcoin can't verify the CounterParty transactions, thus there is no record of the consensus about which CounterParty transactions are valid:
.............................................snip
The technical weakness of CounterParty is that Bitcoin can't verify the CounterParty transactions, thus there is no record of the consensus about which CounterParty transactions are valid:
.............................................snip
the first part is true (Bitcoin does not validate Counterparty transactions), but it doesn't follow that there is thus no record of consensus. counterparty keeps its own "ledger in a ledger" that it assembles from decoding Counterparty protocol data payloads from any Bitcoin transaction that contains them, using the reference client code at https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib ,
it has been working well for over 2.5 years now
There is no longest chain rule Nash equilibrium if the miners aren't validating the CounterParty transactions.
You can dump that technobabble nonsense on the fools here, but you can't fool me.
Remember I warned about the failure of The DAO and the technical problems. Heck I told the founders of Ethereum back in 2014 this would happen.
Ethereum was working fine also, until the money honeypot was large enough and the breakage was significant enough, and then it was proven I was correct.
Nobody listens to an expert. So go ahead...
More discussion was here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15283868
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15284907
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15371923
....snip
The technical weakness of CounterParty is that Bitcoin can't verify the CounterParty transactions, thus there is no record of the consensus about which CounterParty transactions are valid:
.............................................snip
The technical weakness of CounterParty is that Bitcoin can't verify the CounterParty transactions, thus there is no record of the consensus about which CounterParty transactions are valid:
.............................................snip
the first part is true (Bitcoin does not validate Counterparty transactions), but it doesn't follow that there is thus no record of consensus. counterparty keeps its own "ledger in a ledger" that it assembles from decoding Counterparty protocol data payloads from any Bitcoin transaction that contains them, using the reference client code at https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib ,
it has been working well for over 2.5 years now
I don't like to post negative stuff but this is the most stupid thing I have seen at least this week.
This section of the forum is called "Altcoin Discussion" and Counterparty could be called altcoin. My prediction is not an "investment" advice and I just shared a hunch(with nothing to back it cause I am so smart. Really Really Smart). Would will be better to talk only about "coins (scams) of the day"?
....snip
The technical weakness of CounterParty is that Bitcoin can't verify the CounterParty transactions, thus there is no record of the consensus about which CounterParty transactions are valid:
.............................................snip
The technical weakness of CounterParty is that Bitcoin can't verify the CounterParty transactions, thus there is no record of the consensus about which CounterParty transactions are valid:
.............................................snip
You are, of course, smarter with your 150 accounts and 210 quotes from old posts. I just shared my opinion and that's it. You can share yours in a better manner.
I don't like to post negative stuff but this is the most stupid thing I have seen at least this week.
This section of the forum is called "Altcoin Discussion" and Counterparty could be called altcoin. My prediction is not an "investment" advice and I just shared a hunch(with nothing to back it cause I am so smart. Really Really Smart). Would will be better to talk only about "coins (scams) of the day"?
....snip
The technical weakness of CounterParty is that Bitcoin can't verify the CounterParty transactions, thus there is no record of the consensus about which CounterParty transactions are valid:
.............................................snip
The technical weakness of CounterParty is that Bitcoin can't verify the CounterParty transactions, thus there is no record of the consensus about which CounterParty transactions are valid:
.............................................snip
I wouldn't be surprised, seeing as how they're tied in with so many other coins and projects. Next time I make a profit off some trades, I'll be investing into xpy...just hope I don't miss anything big beforehand 
I expect it to pass $8-$10 mark in the next 2-3 months.
https://twitter.com/FAILCommunity/status/740954014225948672
https://twitter.com/FAILCommunity/status/740954014225948672
it will become a huge success
Correct me if I'm wrong, until Bitcoin Lightning, smart contracts will still be in Bitcoin's 10 minute block cycle?
Actually I am gonna go away now.. not gonna get into this.
It's your choice to do it. I just shared a hunch.
My prediction is not an "investment" advice
?
I expect it to pass $8-$10 mark in the next 2-3 months.
https://twitter.com/FAILCommunity/status/740954014225948672
https://twitter.com/FAILCommunity/status/740954014225948672
Actually I am gonna go away now.. not gonna get into this.
Quote
XCP-based stake voting is another safeguard feature – holders of a certain (yet-to-be-decided) percentage of XCP (Counterparty’s native currency unit) may vote to initiate a protocol-sourced rapid shutdown of the EVM subsystem, without affecting the routine workings of the Counterparty network itself.
Anyone know yet what % one must hold in order to vote?
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1010
Professional Native Greek Translator (2000+ done)
I expect it to pass $8-$10 mark in the next 2-3 months.
https://twitter.com/FAILCommunity/status/740954014225948672
https://twitter.com/FAILCommunity/status/740954014225948672
it will become a huge success
I don't like to post negative stuff but this is the most stupid thing I have seen at least this week.
This section of the forum is called "Altcoin Discussion" and Counterparty could be called altcoin. My prediction is not an "investment" advice and I just shared a hunch. Would will be better to talk only about "coins (scams) of the day"?
I expect it to pass $8-$10 mark in the next 2-3 months.
https://twitter.com/FAILCommunity/status/740954014225948672
https://twitter.com/FAILCommunity/status/740954014225948672
Can't say I am any more interest in buying XCP now than I was before opening this thread. I don't like to post negative stuff but this is the most stupid thing I have seen at least this week.
Step one: write a tweet "X is going to Y".
Step two: post it here.
I think next time you should actually have something to say that lends credibility to a prediction of 400% increase in price. Then I would enjoy reading it and possibly invest if I agree. But I only own Bitcoin Factom and Ethereum now. And doing research on NEM.. so I'm very picky and prudent in my investing and only want to put money on things that accelerate crypto.
very little volume moves this one quite a bit both up and down. it will be interesting to keep an eye on it over the next few weeks as more news should affect the price, as previously mentioned.
1. This is my own tweet.
2. It was made earlier this month.
3. I do not own a single XCP.
4. Can't say for sure, but Counterparty was never hyped and it is a valid project. At least in my views.
2. It was made earlier this month.
3. I do not own a single XCP.
4. Can't say for sure, but Counterparty was never hyped and it is a valid project. At least in my views.
"Valid project?
ok, i'll buy that. but... any facts?? new announcements? partnerships? nothing?
dont get me wrong, XCP seems a good project but you made a projection of the price so it must be based on something.
Jump to: