Topic: CP3U SHA Scrypt Quark [XMR-XDN-BCN-BTC-LTC-QRK] win64 CPU Miner i3i5i7 Bulldozer - page 2. (Read 66685 times)
January 15, 2014, 04:55:49 PM
Can you implement for Vertcoin too ?
January 15, 2014, 04:39:20 PM
Update:
Now Mine Bitcoin, Litecoin, Quark , or any similar coin
Now Mine Bitcoin, Litecoin, Quark , or any similar coin
December 31, 2013, 06:57:04 AM
I have been using the Win64_all for about three weeks and then about 3 days ago it started spiting out errors. and then very strangely the minerd.exe just disappeared from my comp. When I try to unzip it again from the zip file it will not unzip, even though it still shows in the zip file. I turned off my virus prog in case it was that but same result.
If I try to download the file again from SF it always comes down corrupt. I tried all the other files. They will download but all crash as soon as they are started. Is this just me or is anyone else experiencing this too.
If I try to download the file again from SF it always comes down corrupt. I tried all the other files. They will download but all crash as soon as they are started. Is this just me or is anyone else experiencing this too.
December 30, 2013, 04:28:33 AM
Quote
I believe the wallet itself is 32 bit? and can solo mine, at a reduced speed.
yes, but what about mining in a pool?considering the difficulty, i think it doesn't worth to mine solo
December 30, 2013, 04:16:24 AM
is there any chance to compile a win32 version?
i'm using q9550 with win32 and i cant install a 64bit windows on it
thanks
i'm using q9550 with win32 and i cant install a 64bit windows on it
thanks
I believe the wallet itself is 32 bit? and can solo mine, at a reduced speed.
December 30, 2013, 03:58:52 AM
is there any chance to compile a win32 version?
i'm using q9550 with win32 and i cant install a 64bit windows on it
thanks
i'm using q9550 with win32 and i cant install a 64bit windows on it
thanks
December 30, 2013, 12:36:30 AM
The Athlon II series most definitely supports it, sse2 was introduced in the Athlon 64.
Ya I saw it when I looked it up - the only flag in the legacy version is for sse2
Any luck with it?
I've only tested for a bit on vishera (bdver2), which works fine.
Still solo mining with gpus though, ~ 75 watts for 2+ mh/s from caymans.
Thanks for testing, I also tested the bulldozer one on 8150, 4300, I did test out a piledriver one too.. maybe 10% increase, maybe not. I'm pretty sure you can push 1.5m on a 8350 @ ~125w.. Id love to get some numbers on a 9590
There is some room to do more improvements on the code still.
Yes, 1.5 mh/s shouldn't be too difficult around the stock parameters. If I don't forget, I could provide you with the ~equivalent of 9590 numbers tomorrow since I keep my base clock at 4.7 ghz now (switched out the stock cooler that I was still using when I did the original test) and I should be able to reach 5 ghz without much trouble, lots of voltage headroom left when compared to a stock 9590. It's a decently binned chip.
Yes please post, this is the CPU that uses 225-250watts? Look forward to your response
edit: also let me know if you want a Steamroller specific build
December 29, 2013, 10:06:25 PM
The Athlon II series most definitely supports it, sse2 was introduced in the Athlon 64.
Ya I saw it when I looked it up - the only flag in the legacy version is for sse2
Any luck with it?
I've only tested for a bit on vishera (bdver2), which works fine.
Still solo mining with gpus though, ~ 75 watts for 2+ mh/s from caymans.
Thanks for testing, I also tested the bulldozer one on 8150, 4300, I did test out a piledriver one too.. maybe 10% increase, maybe not. I'm pretty sure you can push 1.5m on a 8350 @ ~125w.. Id love to get some numbers on a 9590
There is some room to do more improvements on the code still.
Yes, 1.5 mh/s shouldn't be too difficult around the stock parameters. If I don't forget, I could provide you with the ~equivalent of 9590 numbers tomorrow since I keep my base clock at 4.7 ghz now (switched out the stock cooler that I was still using when I did the original test) and I should be able to reach 5 ghz without much trouble, lots of voltage headroom left when compared to a stock 9590. It's a decently binned chip.
December 29, 2013, 09:54:09 PM
i7 2006K OC 4.4GHz 98-94Khashs x Theard = 789|khsahs
December 27, 2013, 04:49:36 PM
getting ~1.1 Mhash on i7-3970X
doesnt seem right to me...
doesnt seem right to me...
strange i get on my i7 3770K only 650khash/s. Any advices?
December 24, 2013, 07:32:05 PM
getting ~1.1 Mhash on i7-3970X
doesnt seem right to me...
doesnt seem right to me...
December 23, 2013, 09:02:57 AM
What can I use for Linux?
just make sure you installed libcurl3-dev
Code:
aptitude install libcurl3-dev
redownload the source, I am using this repro:
Code:
git clone https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark
then it should work, proceed:
Code:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-O3"
/make
./configure CFLAGS="-O3"
/make
I compile on LInux Mint 16, and it worked.
December 19, 2013, 12:18:44 AM
I must be doing something wrong. On my Core I7-3770K I only get about 45 kh/s per thread using Improved2, far less using older versions, less than 1kh/s per thread.
What am I doing wrong? I am getting nothing even remotely close to the 2400 kh/s shown in the OP.
Any ideas?
What am I doing wrong? I am getting nothing even remotely close to the 2400 kh/s shown in the OP.
Any ideas?
December 16, 2013, 10:51:41 PM
Hello all,
Another fan that joins the comunity . Well atm im farming sexcoin with the gpu and quarcoin since i had that quad core doing nothing profitable q9550 at 333khs .
Cya.
Another fan that joins the comunity . Well atm im farming sexcoin with the gpu and quarcoin since i had that quad core doing nothing profitable q9550 at 333khs .
Cya.
December 16, 2013, 07:57:42 AM
I'm not sure what I should be seeing for my CPU, just started reading on the Quark thing. i5-4670 ~760khash/s is good?
December 12, 2013, 08:06:35 PM
OP, what are you running that gets you 2500KH?
December 12, 2013, 03:51:49 PM
You don't need separate ports but you can try all using one worker (to 'smooth out' variance)
That was actually a very good advice... I have now 4 computers running with the same worker.
And coinmine.pl has no problem with it.
The total hashes seem to be about right.
I am now hoping to see a higher shares rate because of the "smoothing out of variance" (as you called it)...
but will have to wait a day or two to get better data.
It seems better...
your shares should be the same either way, it depends on the pool. If you spread it out over many workers some will show 0 rate some will show normal , some higher, the pool is calculating that rate on a small amount of time, so if you get lucky and get many shares it will be higher in that time period, unlucky will show less. The more mining power you use the more it 'smooths out'.
December 12, 2013, 03:37:53 PM
Amazing. Thank you for sharing this.
December 12, 2013, 02:49:30 PM
You don't need separate ports but you can try all using one worker (to 'smooth out' variance)
That was actually a very good advice... I have now 4 computers running with the same worker.
And coinmine.pl has no problem with it.
The total hashes seem to be about right.
I am now hoping to see a higher shares rate because of the "smoothing out of variance" (as you called it)...
but will have to wait a day or two to get better data.
It seems better...
December 12, 2013, 02:37:19 PM
Jump to: