Not that it's getting too boring.. 4D chess again
Does playing 4D chess require lying, defrauding, swindling, doctoring documents, and impostoring? Because he's losing, and no one is playing his game.
obviously he is playing against himself. thats why he thinks he can win. as he is a half wit, one half
will win.. right?
4D chess FTW
Technically speaking, all games of chess are 4D chess. The chessboard and its pieces are 3D.
see? thats why i could never rise to the csw levels of.. whatever it is. i miss such obvious things.
*sigh*
Technically speaking, he’s playing poker with everyone. He actually tweeted a steganographic message about it ~3 years ago. Anybody know what cards he’s holding or is this the amateur table?
Most of us don't play with known frauds/scammers, and it took about 5 minutes (or maybe less) for many of us to hear him first speak to realize that he was a fraud/scammer/narcisist.
His subsequent actions have largely just confirmed the initial impressions, so probably anyone at the table would merely be bag holders of one sort or another filled with hopium and believing in matters that are contrary to the facts.
Who are. US?
Name a few?
I
bolded my statement above, presuming that you are referring to my "most of us" proclamation.
So largely what I am asserting is that most established forum members who regularly post in the forum are not really into shitcoins... I don't need to name any... Yeah, there are a few retarded established forum members, too, and they will frequently show themselves as shitcoiners, but many (if not most) of the regular and established forum members are not into shitcoins or into scams...
Sure if you are a shitcoiner, hv_ , then you might want to presume that there are a lot more shitcoiners out there and a lot more scammers out there, like you. You have shown yourself as both a shitcoiner and a scammer for a long time with your ongoing nonsensical history of posting baloney about BIG blocks and supporting the various scam forks, at least bcash and bcash sv... so sure, good luck with your presumption, if you really have one, that there are a lot more members like you than actually exist...
I will stick with my own presumption, and I am NOT going to get into personality nonsense with someone like you who seems to relish in twisting reasonable points into gibberish.. It is not necessary for me to back up my point anymore than I already have, and probably I entertained your question way more than it deserved, too... hahahahahaha... Your lucky day.
Not that it's getting too boring.. 4D chess again
Does playing 4D chess require lying, defrauding, swindling, doctoring documents, and impostoring? Because he's losing, and no one is playing his game.
obviously he is playing against himself. thats why he thinks he can win. as he is a half wit, one half
will win.. right?
4D chess FTW
Technically speaking, all games of chess are 4D chess. The chessboard and its pieces are 3D.
see? thats why i could never rise to the csw levels of.. whatever it is. i miss such obvious things.
*sigh*
Technically speaking, he’s playing poker with everyone. He actually tweeted a steganographic message about it ~3 years ago. Anybody know what cards he’s holding or is this the amateur table?
Most of us don't play with known frauds/scammers, and it took about 5 minutes (or maybe less) for many of us to hear him first speak to realize that he was a fraud/scammer/narcisist.
His subsequent actions have largely just confirmed the initial impressions, so probably anyone at the table would merely be bag holders of one sort or another filled with hopium and believing in matters that are contrary to the facts.
So you’re telling me the groupthinkers outdid the real thinkers? Would be the first time in history. Hey, don’t forget to wear your mask in dead heat of summer. The TV says there’s a pandemic.
I am not saying that because if you want to show that there are some folks here in the forum engaging in group think because they tend to be skeptical of shitcoins or various attacks on bitcon such as bcash forks, then you have the burden to show such proof of group think... sure go ahead with your proof.. it is likely to come off as a bunch of gibberish, but I am not going to accept your nonsensical conclusory assertion that there is group think going on without some kind of meaningful evidence (which would be a need for both facts and logic... good luck with that).
The face mask situation and various precautions against a virus remains a bit more of a complicated question, and seems to be a far from adequate attempt at an analogical way of arguing your nonsensical points to the extent that you have any points. Is that what you were trying to do, an analogical argument? lame at best, right?
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]