This guy really messed himself up, and I am not going to pity him because he is getting what he deserves since he decided to be a thief and a liar. You don't just come out from nowhere and claim to be who you're not as an attempt to steal what belongs to another person. This year has been really bad for him; it was uncovered that his doctorate was plagiarized from one ‘Farting Unicorn’ or so… and now here's another news that is even more worse than the one that was first revealed.
This is starting to get more funny and I can't really wait to see what's going to happen after all this drama that has been on for years now. One thing for sure is that he's going to regret ever doing this.
Lmao he should have never started filing lawsuits! He dug he own grave! He is also now threatening to sue his neice @River333 and his sister @LisaNEdwards !!!! His walls are crashing in on him and now he is doing what he does best and trying to file lawsuits on his siblings!!!! Even if it was not Satoshi that signed those messages, It was an OG Bitcoiner who has been around since the beginning! I think whoever signed that message is saying Craig is a fraud, I know who satoshi is (Person) or (Team) and I know that it is not Craig Wright!!!!
"My girlfriends last name is WRIGHT, That is why we are still not married"
I think that the most logic that anyone can get from the matter is that Craig asserted that he was satoshi, and he used my 145 bitcoin addresses containing 7,250 coins trying to prove his claim. The real owner said: "Look, he does not have control over such addresses, as he proclaims. These are my coins and addresses."
Now, of course the court can assign intentions, and craig is likely trying to figure out ways that he made mistakes in labelling the addresses or saying that he used to have control but someone stole those keys.. blah blah. He gets caught so many times, that he already does not have a whole hell of a lot of credibility with the court, but if some of the final questions might have to go to the jury rather than the court, so it might not be able to include some of the intentions if some of the matters are going to the jury, such as if there are reasonable disputes of some of the facts.
There is no need for the early bitcoiner to say that he knows who is satoshi and it is not craig, and so the signing of the coins is not exactly a slam dunk, but the more craig gets caught, the more clear it becomes that he is lying. The court might already be inclined to believe that he is a liar, but I think that if there is any ambiguity, then some of the questions could end up in front of a jury to decide reasonable inferences that might go to intent and might not be direct evidence. I don't claim to know all of the details, but I don't know if anyone has to show that they know who is satoshi in order to provide evidence that it is not craig. In other words, I don't even think anyone (important) in the court case is proclaiming that they know who is satoshi, but just showing that craig is not able to support his own claims.. whether it goes to the end question (about being satoshi) or some intermediate step claim of controlling certain addresses or the dumb lame ass claim of the courier or some of his other pie in the sky made up caught a big fish stories.
Of course, many of us have seen that craig has had other likely agenda points too, and some of his various shenanigans are merely to get dumb wishful thinking fucks about some of his claims to pump up his lameass coin in order that at some point he (and his buddy calvin) might be able to fork off and then take control over dormant BSV (such as what would have been the equivalent of Satoshi's coins) and trying to convince the dumb ass followers that it is just and good because craig is satoshi.. so it is not like giving them anything that they don't already deserve... .blah blah blah.. baloney.. and hoping to keep up the price of BSV during these various ploys. But still even some of the dumb wishful fucks are having their doubts about craig (which many of us thought it should have been obvious within about 10 minutes of first hearing him talk - wasn't that 2014-ish?
Yes I agree completly!!! I think it is best that we keep Satoshi a secret! It has worked this far.
There might be someone who actually knows who Satoshi is or was, in the event that he is not dead. Does not seem to be necessary that we know, and I suspect that if the real satoshi is (or has been) pointed out, he will just deny or deflect... but surely, if there were some irrefutable evidence then it might become more difficult to deny or deflect, I suppose.
I really think that this helps prove Craig is a fraud.
Like I mentioned in my earlier post, I thought that it should have been pretty clear within about 10 minutes of his first proclaiming to be Satoshi in 2014 that he was full of shit. So, yeah, there has been more and more evidence showing the ongoing fraudulent nature of his various claims.
That alone is a HUGE STEP!!!
Maybe this is where we differ? I don't really believe that it is that huge of a step, but maybe it could be helpful to convince some of the retards to dump their BSV.. but who knows, they might pump it instead, since it hardly has any liquidity, anyhow... The coins price is close to the same kind of fraud as those dweebs, craig and calvin.
I will agree that it feels kind of nice to see some more direct slaps in the face that might cause some public squirming and more nonsense public contradictions - including increasingly contributing to conclusions that anyone talking up the project are either scammers, pie in the sky dreamers living in a fantasy, or retarded.
Sure there are likely some of the BSV sheisters who are trying to shed a lot of negative light on BSV because they believe that it makes the whole space look ridiculous, including bitcoin.. so there are some folks playing that angle to the extent they believe that they can get any traction out of it.
I would rather we never know who Satoshi is.
Well, I suppose that the longer that we do not know who he is (was) then the more likely that we might never know, yet I suppose that there will continue to be speculation, so I doubt that the topic is really going to go away. In any event, I agree with the overall proposition that it is not really necessary to know who is satoshi, but if we happen to find out who is satoshi, then surely any of us investing in bitcoin should be prepared for that possible outcome too, even though currently it does not seem to be very likely that we will find out who satoshi is, at any time in the near future.
I would like to know why he didn't touch the coins at $20,000 a BTC.
I don't know what is so curious about that. There have been many times in which satoshi could have made a killing from his coins and even just moving a few coins, but he never moved any because it seems that he was not motivated financially by this project... at least that seems to be the fair inferences from the various evidence of none of his coins moving, at least so far not moving as far as we know. Sure there could be some other explanations, and without more context, I am not sure how important it would be to necessarily explore so many possible explanations or motives beyond just that he did not seem to be specifically personally financially motivated.... Would it be detrimental if I am wrong in my own tentative conclusion? Perhaps. But I doubt that it is even necessary to explore whether I am wrong, unless some important and/or material facts develop.. otherwise we are just engaging in pie in the sky speculation.. about something that might not even happen or be important in real actual bitcoin dynamics, whether price, development, adoption, other networking effects or otherwise.
I guess when you mined blocks of 50 back in 2009 by now you can afford to not touch them. Must be nice lol
There are a variety of ways in which people view wealth, and surely a lot of people will change their perspectives about wealth and finances through their lives, too.
There are some people who feel content with modest levels of wealth or even just living in a kind of way that they believe is personally sustainable and covering all of their needs, and maybe with some emergency funds. So, sometimes we cannot really extrapolate particulars about his particular situation, and it is also possible that he died, too.
Does he still have access? I love the mystery behind it. Every few years new major posts just pop up out of the blue.
Intriguing for a lot of people.. not only you. That's for sure. And, yeah, funny how there might be a lot of mystery holders from those early coins that have not moved... not just satoshi.. and so some of the early adopters have become known, but sometimes they just come out of the woodwork, as you indicated.
I love Bitcoin it is truly amazing and anonymous!
It is probably better to characterize bitcoin as a kind of pseudo anonymous rather than truly anonymous, and I surely do not feel technically competent enough to understand how various anonymity tools can be better used to ensure a decent level of anonymity... and I think that there are also some users historically who had thought that they were more anonymous than they ended up being, especially sometimes once one address is identified and sometimes it can end up having transactions that combine it with other addresses and then remove some levels of anonymity.
