Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto - Evidence Here - page 10.

HardFireMiner

full member

Activity: 872

Merit: 120

Quote from: Ailmand on April 16, 2019, 04:17:27 AM

I am actually getting tired of hearing Craig Wright cry that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. It's really hilarious how he gets fires up attacling people who are saying he is not, and he even filed legal actions to some of the. I believe before ho does that he must present a solid a d credible proof that he really is Nakamoto.

As I said in my first post here -

Quote

In my opinion, in the near future he is going with this and other evidence to some US court and proves behind any doubt that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto.

If a Supreme Court receives enough evidence to confirm that CW is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto, will you still be tired of hearing of him, what will you feel then?

HardFireMiner

full member

Activity: 872

Merit: 120

Quote from: anu1908 on April 16, 2019, 04:06:32 AM

i don't care who satoshi is, but i believe someone who files a lawsuit against somebody who don't believe in what he said is not satoshi.

here's what satoshi said in the past (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6306)

Quote

If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.

so even if craig is really satoshi, then he is not the same satoshi that i knew.

Why not give the full sentence?

Quote

See the snack machine thread, I outline how a payment processor could verify payments well enough, actually really well (much lower fraud rate than credit cards), in something like 10 seconds or less. If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.

He is talking about payment processor and transaction speed. What is your point exactly with the quote? Actually it sounds very much as Craig Wright expressed himself on twitter.

Ailmand

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 519

Coindragon.com 30% Cash Back

I am actually getting tired of hearing Craig Wright cry that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. It's really hilarious how he gets fires up attacling people who are saying he is not, and he even filed legal actions to some of the. I believe before ho does that he must present a solid a d credible proof that he really is Nakamoto.

anu1908

sr. member

Activity: 770

Merit: 268

i don't care who satoshi is, but i believe someone who files a lawsuit against somebody who don't believe in what he said is not satoshi.

here's what satoshi said in the past (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6306)

Quote

If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.

so even if craig is really satoshi, then he is not the same satoshi that i knew.

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 9709

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

He’s an embarrassment to be honest, a cringeworthy weasel. I can’t wait until we see his demise. The only way he can prove he is Satoshi is if he signs a message from a well known Satoshi early address & he won’t because he can’t.

HardFireMiner

full member

Activity: 872

Merit: 120

Check this out, from article posted 4 days ago:

Quote

It is incredibly ironic that people think Bitcoin is in any way about anonymity. I wouldn’t stop people trying to hide behind TOR, but such is not the purpose of Bitcoin. Bitcoin was birthed using a credit card payment. The records of the same payment are required to be kept by the banking system for 25 years. It hasn’t been that long. More importantly, I claimed the expenses on my tax in the 2008/2009 tax year. You see, a domain purchase in August 2008 is within the Australian tax year, but I was audited, which ended up going to court.

What you don’t realise yet is that I used my credit card. Yes, as crazy as it might seem to you, I used my credit card to purchase anonymous services. I even claimed it on my tax. I had an argument with the tax office in Australia about claiming it.

I told you to be careful in what you wanted and what you wished for, because you’re going to get it. I am the person behind the moniker Satoshi Nakamoto, and as a result of all the trolls and haters, I’m going to provide evidence. Not in a way that anonymous cowards would do. I’m going to use courts and law.

Welcome to law.

In my opinion, in the near future he is going with this and other evidence to some US court and proves behind any doubt that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto.

Unleash the kraken, I want to see some real flame and despair in this thread!

https://medium.com/@craig_10243/evidence-and-law-f8f10001efa5

Topic: Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto - Evidence Here - page 10. (Read 13676 times)