Topic: Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto - Evidence Here - page 9. (Read 13677 times)
I do not understand why so much discussion on the subject, as the ceo of binance says: if it really is satoshi nakamoto, because it does not make a digital signature to prove it? or move the bottom where you have saved your bitcoins for more than 8 years? (in bitinfocharts you can see wallets that have not moved in that time), it's as simple as that!
I am actually getting tired of hearing Craig Wright cry that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. It's really hilarious how he gets fires up attacling people who are saying he is not, and he even filed legal actions to some of the. I believe before ho does that he must present a solid a d credible proof that he really is Nakamoto.
Filing legal action against those who attacked him for not being Satoshi Nakamoto means that, his claims are not true but false. The proof should come from the signing of the early addresses of the real Satoshi Nakamoto. He should stop this social media thing of being Satoshi Nakamoto. 
I am actually getting tired of hearing Craig Wright cry that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. It's really hilarious how he gets fires up attacling people who are saying he is not, and he even filed legal actions to some of the. I believe before ho does that he must present a solid a d credible proof that he really is Nakamoto.
I knew Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto was a friend of mine. And Craig S. Wright is no Satoshi Nakamoto.
The only way he can prove he is Satoshi is if he signs a message from a well known Satoshi early address & he won’t because he can’t.
I wouldn't believe him even if he could.If he somehow managed to sign from an early Satoshi-linked address, then all that proves is that he has his hands on the private key to that address. I think it would be a much more likely scenario that he had somehow stumbled upon/stolen the private keys or seed from Satoshi or someone else who was around in the very early days of bitcoin. Comparing Satoshi's writing and philosophy with CSW's lies, scams and general incompetence, is more than enough proof that they are not the same person, regardless of any private keys that CSW may or may not control.
Can you imagine going to such great lengths to stay anonymous and then completely disappear, only to come back, offer no proof, and then start suing people who don't believe you?
i don't care who satoshi is, but i believe someone who files a lawsuit against somebody who don't believe in what he said is not satoshi.
here's what satoshi said in the past (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6306)
so even if craig is really satoshi, then he is not the same satoshi that i knew.
This really blows it all. I don't really know why people are believing that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto. And filing a lawsuit against someone? That's very rude and unworthy of everybody's time to listen to. If he is the real personality behind bitcoin, then he don't need to convince us any longer. here's what satoshi said in the past (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6306)
Quote
If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
so even if craig is really satoshi, then he is not the same satoshi that i knew.
And even though the quote came from Satoshi answering questions in forum, still if that phrase is what he holds on then Craig Wright is not Satoshi.
First things first, lets call him 'Fake Right' rather than 'Craig Wright' 
I don't think Satoshi revealing his identity would matter much to bitcoin. All it can do is add a little publicity to bitcoin which will in turn create a short temporary spike in bitcoin's price.
Once the things are settled bitcoin will continue to grow naturally as it always had been unless new developments take place.
So even if Fake Right is not fake it won't matter to bitcoin.
I don't think Satoshi revealing his identity would matter much to bitcoin. All it can do is add a little publicity to bitcoin which will in turn create a short temporary spike in bitcoin's price.
Once the things are settled bitcoin will continue to grow naturally as it always had been unless new developments take place.
So even if Fake Right is not fake it won't matter to bitcoin.
it still surprises me that some people to this day still insist on accepting the lies of CW even though his fraud can not be any clearer than this!
all that aside, the funniest thing about all this is that the drama that CW started is biting him in the ass as BSV is dropping so hard these days and is also being removed from the big altcoin exchanges
all that aside, the funniest thing about all this is that the drama that CW started is biting him in the ass as BSV is dropping so hard these days and is also being removed from the big altcoin exchanges
People have indeed started receiving legal notices from Craig for calling him fake. Among the receivers, there are some prominent people like Vitalik and Peter McCormack. Now today Peter McCormack issued a counter notice to Craig. The debate and legal battle is just warming up and we will have a long story to follow soon.
In the meantime BSV is getting delisted from Binance. So wait and watch before jumping into a conclusion! This attention drama is not going to end anytime soon!
In the meantime BSV is getting delisted from Binance. So wait and watch before jumping into a conclusion! This attention drama is not going to end anytime soon!
Again and again, we hear more news about him. Okay, if he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto, let's him to show the proof and verify himself as the real one. Let's him brought the case to the court and see what justice will say about him and who is he. I will wait for the next news about him, and if he is the real Satoshi, then I will wait for him to pump the bitcoin price and don't dump bitcoin price to run away for the money.
I hear he rested on the seventh day. What do you think ?
I heard that too but I don't think it's right, still a lot to be created, there was no time to rest
. 
I hear he rested on the seventh day. What do you think ?
If he is the satoshi nakamoto then why did he hide himself and even he promoted the crypto currency and blockchain and did not came forward claiming himself the developer behind it. But now when this project got famous and billions of amount is their behind the real name he wanted to take the credit but he dont have any full proof sources to claim it. Even he dont have the keys to open the wallets which were used in the starting of the mining. This is nothing but the useless stunt to be in limelight.
Enough of these speculative speech from Craig Wright as the real Satoshi Nakamoto, how can somebody who never believe on the technology created by himself and his team? that's some sort of misunderstanding on Craig W. part. Let him clear this ones and for all by signing a message from the early Satoshi wallet, than you.
Did you actually believe that scumbag to be the real Satoshi when his evidence is not that heavy? He released man articles for his claims but none did suffice for his claims.
Check this out, from article posted 4 days ago:
In my opinion, in the near future he is going with this and other evidence to some US court and proves behind any doubt that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto.
Unleash the kraken, I want to see some real flame and despair in this thread!
https://medium.com/@craig_10243/evidence-and-law-f8f10001efa5
Quote
It is incredibly ironic that people think Bitcoin is in any way about anonymity. I wouldn’t stop people trying to hide behind TOR, but such is not the purpose of Bitcoin. Bitcoin was birthed using a credit card payment. The records of the same payment are required to be kept by the banking system for 25 years. It hasn’t been that long. More importantly, I claimed the expenses on my tax in the 2008/2009 tax year. You see, a domain purchase in August 2008 is within the Australian tax year, but I was audited, which ended up going to court.
What you don’t realise yet is that I used my credit card. Yes, as crazy as it might seem to you, I used my credit card to purchase anonymous services. I even claimed it on my tax. I had an argument with the tax office in Australia about claiming it.
I told you to be careful in what you wanted and what you wished for, because you’re going to get it. I am the person behind the moniker Satoshi Nakamoto, and as a result of all the trolls and haters, I’m going to provide evidence. Not in a way that anonymous cowards would do. I’m going to use courts and law.
Welcome to law.
What you don’t realise yet is that I used my credit card. Yes, as crazy as it might seem to you, I used my credit card to purchase anonymous services. I even claimed it on my tax. I had an argument with the tax office in Australia about claiming it.
I told you to be careful in what you wanted and what you wished for, because you’re going to get it. I am the person behind the moniker Satoshi Nakamoto, and as a result of all the trolls and haters, I’m going to provide evidence. Not in a way that anonymous cowards would do. I’m going to use courts and law.
Welcome to law.
In my opinion, in the near future he is going with this and other evidence to some US court and proves behind any doubt that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto.
Unleash the kraken, I want to see some real flame and despair in this thread!
https://medium.com/@craig_10243/evidence-and-law-f8f10001efa5
As someone pointed out in response to him, that screenshot means nothing, because such services can be purchased for any domain. Moreover, I notice it is only a partial screenshot.
Every one can claim that he is Nakamoto. So what if,Wright is real Nakamoto? It is doesn't matter even he is rmthe real Nakamoto or not,because even we found out and recognized Nakamoto's personality and know who is he we did not have any reward or income, so why we are still very curius in his real identity. Make sense.
Lmao. Another 'Craig Wright is Satoshi' thread. At this rate, it feels like he is forcing everyone to believe that he is the One. This is downright hilarious. Even exchanges like Binance are pissed with what this guy is trying to do here and went on to delist BSV.
BSV already fell in value by 17% since then. Complete stupidity.
BSV already fell in value by 17% since then. Complete stupidity.
Bitcoin is now way bigger than anyone that claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto. I thought I read that Wright doesn't write a bitcoin code! Even if he was the real Satoshi which I will never believe, he won't need to visit the court to prove his Identity, he should simply avoid a fight and prove that technologically which of course he really can't.
If a Supreme Court receives enough evidence to confirm that CW is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto, will you still be tired of hearing of him, what will you feel then?
who the f** is supreme court? we are in a bitcoin world and everything is decentralized and protected by strong cryptography of elliptic curves. i don't give a f** about what some court says ,when CW has not been able to provide a simple cryptographic proof of his identity. a proof that is so easy and yet so strong that can easily be produced if you have the keys and is impossible to fake if you don't. and he has failed to provide that.
Why all this game from Craig wrght, if truly he is santoshi then there are hundred ways he can prove that to us either by signing a message with santoshi wallet or better still clarify the whole situations by withdrawing from santoshi bitcoin balance as a proof. I read in the news that Craig is sue to court for fraud related offenses how true is that.
Jump to: