Pages:
Author

Topic: Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto - Evidence Here - page 2. (Read 13751 times)

newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Check this out, from article posted 4 days ago:

Quote
It is incredibly ironic that people think Bitcoin is in any way about anonymity. I wouldn’t stop people trying to hide behind TOR, but such is not the purpose of Bitcoin. Bitcoin was birthed using a credit card payment. The records of the same payment are required to be kept by the banking system for 25 years. It hasn’t been that long. More importantly, I claimed the expenses on my tax in the 2008/2009 tax year. You see, a domain purchase in August 2008 is within the Australian tax year, but I was audited, which ended up going to court.
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*V3xLxeU37jnh5xbuvM5xsA.png
What you don’t realise yet is that I used my credit card. Yes, as crazy as it might seem to you, I used my credit card to purchase anonymous services. I even claimed it on my tax. I had an argument with the tax office in Australia about claiming it.

I told you to be careful in what you wanted and what you wished for, because you’re going to get it. I am the person behind the moniker Satoshi Nakamoto, and as a result of all the trolls and haters, I’m going to provide evidence. Not in a way that anonymous cowards would do. I’m going to use courts and law.

Welcome to law.



In my opinion, in the near future he is going with this and other evidence to some US court and proves behind any doubt that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto.

Unleash the kraken, I want to see some real flame and despair in this thread!

https://medium.com/@craig_10243/evidence-and-law-f8f10001efa5

I respect your aspirations to find someone who really is Satoshi Nakamoto. But my question is: why? Is this going to lead to something? It seems to me that it doesn’t matter who it is, Craig Wright or someone else, because it will not affect anything.
jr. member
Activity: 104
Merit: 2
The case is becoming interesting.. Court ordered him to pay 5 billion dollars.. I read it today.. I'm confused, so did he ever actually have alot of bitcoins? does he currently even have one? did he claim to be satoshi just for attention and then got stuck having to pay money back he's never had? You can read more at

https://btcmanager.com/craig-wright-5-billion-bitcoin-fifty-percent-intellectual-property/?q=/craig-wright-5-billion-bitcoin-fifty-percent-intellectual-property/&q=/craig-wright-5-billion-bitcoin-fifty-percent-intellectual-property/&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=socialpush&utm_campaign=SNAP
member
Activity: 590
Merit: 39
Tomorrow, on Bloomberg, Dr. Craig Steven Wright on "60 Minutes".



So, how did this episode turn out? Did it have the worldwide transformative effecting the slobbering BSV fanatics thought that it would? I must have missed it. Oh, that's right, everybody missed it, because it didn't happen.

Much like how CSW being Satoshi never happened.


The media just love this kind of controversy. If people hate him, even better, more attention they will receive. So here we are talking about bloomberg Wink
sr. member
Activity: 819
Merit: 251
I don't really think he is the Satoshi Nakamoto, There are so many experts saying that. For sure they made their own research just to prove that Craig is not satoshi right. Even McAfee didn't say that Craig is satoshi. A lot of humor but still he can't use Satoshi first account here and move bitcoin from his wallet. If he manages to do that for sure almost all of the people in the crypto world will believe him.
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 251
He’s an embarrassment to be honest, a cringeworthy weasel. I can’t wait until we see his demise. The only way he can prove he is Satoshi is if he signs a message from a well known Satoshi early address & he won’t because he can’t.


if he is the real satoshi btc price going to plummet, hes nothing like the satoshi in the forum posts, that seemed like a humble guy. this craig seems like another donald trump type of moron lol Cheesy
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
Does Satoshi Nakamoto still matter to everyone? I still wonder if he recognizes himself á Satoshi Nakamoto, why didn't he want people to know about he 10 years ago? Can anybody explain ?

Bitcoin pointed out to banker bailouts in the genesis block.  So people would think it is kind of like anti banker.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Genesis_block (picture of the banker bailouts there)

Reading the first sentence of the white paper, it does become apparent it is anti current financial institution(fiat usd,cad,euro,yen etc)
https://twitter.com/ThugLifeBlazer/status/1138504762519949313 (it is in this picture)

So satoshi was taking on the biggest boys in the game, bigger than a nation, the banking systems of the nations. clearly in the white paper in the first sentence it state the purpose of bitcoin not to have to go through financial institutions but people still do, the second you change btc into fiat you are going through one. I have obtained many btc (never used fiat to buy them) and I have used many bitcoins to buy items (did not use fiat). So it is possible to use btc as it is intended.

So satoshi nakamoto was pretty much taking on the banks, People have been killed for less, but keep this in mind that it could all be reverse psychology and satoshi could be working for the IMF or FED.

satoshi did say in a email that he left the project to Gavin Andreson and it is in good hands
April 23 2011, said “I’ve moved on to other things. It’s in good hands with Gavin and everyone.”

Gavin Andreson admits to being a CIA informant.  So it could all be the reverse psychology like I said.
https://youtu.be/6pWblf8COH4?t=330

Either way bitcoin is much better than fiat, but we have a way to make something better than bitcoin and fiat now. It is just a matter of time before I plant enough minds seeds for it to work.

Just note bitcoin is in good hands of the CIA, let us be real the CIA is not good hands.
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00806R000201150052-5.pdf

A FUCKING 13YR OLD HAS TO TELL THEM

anyways CSW is not satoshi he a fucking moron poser.
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 100
Does Satoshi Nakamoto still matter to everyone? I still wonder if he recognizes himself á Satoshi Nakamoto, why didn't he want people to know about he 10 years ago? Can anybody explain ?
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Tomorrow, on Bloomberg, Dr. Craig Steven Wright on "60 Minutes".



So, how did this episode turn out? Did it have the worldwide transformative effecting the slobbering BSV fanatics thought that it would? I must have missed it. Oh, that's right, everybody missed it, because it didn't happen.

Much like how CSW being Satoshi never happened.
jr. member
Activity: 135
Merit: 1
I believe this article is an excellent comment to all this threads about Satoshi identity...
It doesn't matter who he, or she, is. Bitcoin is not a religion, it don't need a prophet.
Agree. Besides, if Satoshi will ever reveal his/her identity, probably there will be many people who won't believe in it, cause Bitcoin have became so well known that it's already not possible to convince everyone to this. So, it would end up with some major divides in crypto society.
yep, it definitely starts to look like religion to me right now
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1722
https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF
Op Ed: How Many Wrongs Make a Wright? ...
- https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright/

Tomorrow, on Bloomberg, Dr. Craig Steven Wright on "60 Minutes".





Some useful links from ...

How to be a "Faketoshi", better than any other "Faketoshi" !?!
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/how-to-be-a-faketoshi-better-than-any-other-faketoshi-5148607

Is there any benefit that people could gain through faking Satoshi? I wonder why some people are exerting and effort to pretend as if they're really Satoshi. They're just making fun of themselves to be honest. Satoshi is someone who deserves our respect so I don't think faking his identity is right.

This is the point I'm making here ... One cannot 'fake' actual cryptographic proof of Satoshi's wallets and/or keys.

To this date no one has provided any definitive proof of being Satoshi Nakamoto, whatsoever.

Bitcoin is Financial Cryptography software. Satoshi can prove identity cryptographically, without due legal process or unlawful circumvention.

Don't trust, Sign and Verify.

If anyone reading does not fully understand this - learn how to use Bitcoin properly!

... snip ...

Hey Bloomberg and bnnbloomberg.ca ...

- https://twitter.com/BNNBloomberg/status/1133831635189796864

- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1133840105049870336

Do you do journalistic fact-checking before broadcasting? See above ...  Roll Eyes

oops ...

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact-checking

Canadian Broadcast Standards Council - Complaints ...
- https://www.cbsc.ca/make-a-complaint/

News Media Canada - Consumer Complaints ...
- https://nmc-mic.ca/about-newspapers/press-complaints/


...

#PROBLEM *NSFW*
- https://youtu.be/9ClYy0MxsU0

...

... snip ...

Unleash the kraken, I want to see some real flame and despair in this thread!

... snip ...

 Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 1002
Merit: 112
Craig wright lol NEXT! I am sick of all this craig thing. If he is really satoshi then he must prove it! It's so easy to prove. He can just sign a message on one of the wallet used by Satoshi before but he can't do that coz he is not satoshi!
jr. member
Activity: 93
Merit: 3
I believe this article is an excellent comment to all this threads about Satoshi identity...
It doesn't matter who he, or she, is. Bitcoin is not a religion, it don't need a prophet.
full member
Activity: 630
Merit: 172
This guy is able to persuade a lot of people, many people I've talked to believe this guy is 100 percennt the real deal.  Just goes to show how easily people are manipulated.  I'm not saying he wasn't around during the early days of bitcoin but other people were most likely doing the real development.
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
At the end there was not much choice as BTC steered further and further away from Bitcoin with junk segwit implementations and other protocol changes.
After the outing by the two magazine articles the only logical move was to jump in the driver seat again and steer it in the right direction.
sr. member
Activity: 1512
Merit: 316
A person that tried so hard to keep his identity safe and didn't disclose any private info until the moment he quit, obviously has no reason to appear a few years later and behave like a cry-baby.

Unless he had a stroke.

Real Satoshi would never do all such things else would have done way back when it had reached the top and not now trying to just be the Satoshi . Also we are not sure if it is institution or an individual who had created this btc and this technology.
member
Activity: 192
Merit: 13
A person that tried so hard to keep his identity safe and didn't disclose any private info until the moment he quit, obviously has no reason to appear a few years later and behave like a cry-baby.

Unless he had a stroke.
full member
Activity: 324
Merit: 100
Criag can never be satoshi. If so, why don't he use any of satoshi's known address to prove the identity with signing a message? I guess he is a shill only.

well, maybe it could be like that.  if the craig is satoshi, maybe the observers, journalists and TV media will be busy asking for their information directly.  but I consider this to be just information that will make bitcoin increasingly public, I hope there is a lot of positive side to this information, and not the other way around, it makes Bitcoin more cornered.
full member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 105
What is the point in trying to prove you are Satoshi??? What is actually there to gain fron it??  I don't think it should be too difficult to prove you are a particular person if youvare indeed not faking.
I am not sure he is Satoshi Nakamoto, because there must be scientific proof to be able to confirm the truth. It may be necessary to match fingerprints with the devices used for the creation of bitcoin projects or other legacy evidence that can be recognized more forensically, such as DNA.
Everyone may be able to claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, but that confession must be accompanied by valid evidence which is indisputable.

I never believe that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, no matter how many proofs are there. My point of view is that even if he is Satoshi Nakamoto, why he did not disclose it before ? Why he remain hidden ?
Now i think it is very hard to believe anyone who claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 1142
Ιntergalactic Conciliator
Tomorrow, on Bloomberg, Dr. Craig Steven Wright on "60 Minutes".






even i can go there completely anonymous if i pay the proper amount of money

I seriously doubt that.

Can you prove me wrong?

i dont care as i dont care where this scammer hoaxer appear.
He has zero impact to Bitcoin even bitcoin price. Craig Wright is a well known scammer and he promote his shitcoin agenda with dozen of stolen  bitcoins. Nothing more nothing less.
full member
Activity: 872
Merit: 120
Tomorrow, on Bloomberg, Dr. Craig Steven Wright on "60 Minutes".






even i can go there completely anonymous if i pay the proper amount of money

I seriously doubt that.

Can you prove me wrong?
Pages:
Jump to: