I'm sorry to say but I don't agree with this, in 20-30 years from now I still think people will remember that one of the best batsman in the world at the time of this test series in Smith wasn't playing for Australia and that one of the best opening batsman in the world Warner was also not playing. Don't forget that this ball tampering from the three Australian guys will always be remembered due to it was the biggest thing to happen in Australian cricket so I believe everyone will remember that in this test series where India beat Australia on home soil that two of Australia's best batsman were not playing. Like I have been saying if they were playing it would of been a different story and the series would of been a lot closer then it was.
I am sorry for the confusion. It came out because of the Indian perspective and in the Indian context. I stand by it.
Yes, you are right no one will forget them. And If by any chance you guys forget this then English and South African will remind you for sure that why did they not play in this series.
I 100% agree that it would of have been a different story. Having said that now it's effortless to say this for us because results are out. That's another debate that they could face Indian pacer line up or not. I am not sure about Warner due to his poor form ( will back my statement with stats), but Smith can surely tackle them.
If you remember our previous discussion. This one:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47442724 I was against one year ban( 5-6 test ban was enough) If it wasn't for one year ban then they would be playing last 2 test against India if I am not mistaken.
I mentioned earlier about both batting line up struggle and bench strength here
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47952602Before this series, we were saying that both batting lineups are struggling badly. Be it India or Australia. But in this tour Indian batters played well and won the series. Special mention to team management. who dropped both their top order batsmen and one promising batsman (Prithvi Shaw) got injured.
It's not an easy task to do in the middle of the tour. Bringing Mayank was the brave call or moving middle order batsman to top order, and Debutant Mayank grabbed this opportunity by both hands. But it shows that India got strong bench strength which Australia Lacks by miles right now. this is the main reason IMHO.
Couple of points I raised in reply to your post previously about the pitch. guess you missed it?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49055891I pulled up some records of David Warner and Smith.
2017 against IndiaDavid warner 38,10, 33,17,19,14,56,6
Steve Smith 27, 109, 8,28,178,21,111,17
Smith was in good form but David Warner not really. Brainfade incident was limelight in this series. kohli said in interview with stress that he saw Oz team doing this 2 times by himself and pointed out this with the umpire but no one really believed him.
Ashes seriesSteve Smith was on fire and his peak during the Ashes but Warner didn't perform well according to his reputation despite playing in the home.
South Africa Tour David Warner: 51 , 28, 63, 13, 30, 32
Smith :56, 38, 25, 11, 5,7
As you can see pretty average tour for both but my concern here is David Warner due to his form.
Rest is history!