FIFA rules are pretty clear. They have large number of teams as well as sufficient funds. Moreover, when the whole world is interested in playing football, the organization of football will grow naturally. But there is no doubt that FIFA wants to be free from the political situation. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wanted to give a short speech before the final match at the last World Cup but FIFA rejected his request. This suggests that FIFA generally tries to avoid political issues. There is a vast difference in between ICC and FIFA.
FIFA is one of the toughest sports organization which is having good system to implement their decision, and they never talk about which is the biggest market and how beneficial are things from any country when they decide about their policies these works for all countries and never favor any particular country just because of this FIFA is having amazing success just like we have in Qatar too many rumors and criticism, but they were stick with their decision and at the end we have one of the best event in Qatar2022.Now if we talk about Cricket here we have biased monopoly which is working for their own sack, and they never respect their own decisions and mostly favoured by three countries which have nothing with cricket just doing their own business just because of this we are unable to have cricket in Olympics and now many other factors which I don't want to write, but this all is just based on personal issues which are not related to security and for the love of this game it's all simple.
That's a question that is yet to be seen and answered.
