Well, there are many different opinions from reviewers, I have come across people here in the forum who make very accurate reviews, but lately I have seen the reviews of some and I did not like them, in fact I intervened in their thread and said that I did not know any casino of what they will name, and of course the fact is that when we are used to seeing the casinos that are here in the forum that have their own thread Ann for me they are much more reliable than those that do not have a thread, but I know that everything is not it works like this, many are not interested in making Ann threads in any forum, maybe it's not her address, but there must be at least one known casino among the first, I mean Stale.com, Betfury, bitcasino, Roobet, among others that they are excellent and reputable, so when they show very rare casinos, it is obvious that we will be somewhat suspicious.
I've also encountered these threads on the forum where it discuss famous casino and it was linked to a review website platform. Unfortunately, I personally would not think of trusting these review sites as upon checking on those, they are paid by the casino they've listed on their site not only to review them but rather endorsed and advertised them. I've replied on that thread as well as other users from the forum that the casino are now well-known yet the OP has defended those website as if they were his. Those kind of behaviour are not to be tolerated especially as a review platform.
It's best to check the platform's trustworthiness before checking if list of casino they are reviewing are good or bad.
Yes, it is that they defend their review but based on unconvincing arguments, and I have found many cases of shillihg that are evident, I do not know if it is because a nascent casino wants to get afloat and seeks to do some very hidden advertising through ehios and of reviewers, really the reviews that I like the most are from GamblingPro, I think there is no other reviewer who is more successful than him in the forum, besides that I see him as an incorruptible person and that is what is sought, a Review that adapts to what we are always looking for, which is to protect our money and be able to bet safely, which is why casinos like stakle.com, bitcasino.io, and many more will always be the best for the degree of reliability.
If some casinos offer even small surcharges or just bonuses to some author of a gambling review site, such an author will still agree to post positive information about this casino. But there is also the opposite - some kind of casino can also order anti-advertising of competitors. And also for money. As a result, all information will be so distorted that it will not correspond to the objective picture of events in the casino world at all. So none of the gambling review sites can be trusted.
As long as it's a business matter, especially in the cryptocurrency gambling category, the battle is really about money. It seems that in a trial the lawyer can make the wrong turn out to be right, and the right turns out to be wrong in the end.
The same goes for conducting a review on a casino platform here in the crypto space. So I agree with what you are saying, friend. We just have to do it, it's better that we know for ourselves if it is worthy of trust or not, it's that simple for me.
Well, we all know that a lot of money will always be handled in the gambling business, but it is well known that there are also some casinos that are titans in this world and that have great machinery, it is very difficult for some sites that are beginning to catch up, so Is what they see faster to get fame? apart from using social networks they have these resources that are very good when it comes to having fast traffic, reviewers or those users who do reviews like this, they can write many things, for some money, but I have seen that here the reviewers who So of newbie accounts, they are the ones who do this type of advertising, they do not have much impact, an important reviewer who does something like this, would totally lose his reputation in seconds.