Topic: Crypto traders beaten by girls (Read 837 times)

A well-designed survey can be a good way of studying reality, and I don't think we have any better method than that (unless you have access to the actual raw and complete data of the studied subject). The problem usually is with the interpretations and conclusions of the surveys, where there's a big risk of misinterpretation.


Sure, but having better analytical skills doesn't guarantee profit. You can spend ages analysing market information and past trends and still be wrong and make a loss. Whereas someone who doesn't even try to analyse anything at all, but just buys and holds, could make a profit.

Surveys certainly cannot be used as a benchmark for truth, if the survey was conducted in another country the results would be different, in general I believe men can beat women when trading, this is because men have better analytical skills than women.

From the survey data, why do women get better returns on investing in crypto, maybe because women are calmer in making decisions so when they start deciding to buy or sell at a more appropriate time than men, and I think other factors, for example, men are who have responsibility at home to meet all the necessities of life so they will quickly take profits when they look profitable while women really see it as an investment and can wait patiently until they achieve a better profit.
And when we read the survey results, we must also consider many things, so what is conveyed in the survey may be different if it is done in another country or in a different survey period and sample, so it is not completely accurate but that's not to say it's a lie.

I think there's no need to trust those random and unauthenticated surveys. We can conduct our own survey with our locality, our relationship know. I believe that when it comes to crypto investment, the number of women cannot be more than men. The world is becoming more equal, women are also starting to enter the male-dominated sectors, but to surpass men is not easy. Even the people I know who are investing in this cryptocurrency are primarily men, with only a few women.

If we pay attention, there are many things that are actually a field or work of the role of women are better than men, if we come to the office then most who work are women than men, but if we look at work outside the office or field then more men than women, And I think it's natural that when trading women can defeat men.

One could argue if the sample is representative (I think it is for the purpose of comparison of men Vs women performance), but in terms of sample size - it's definitely not small. Some would say it's actually too large. A sample of 1,000 respondents is considered large and anything above that won’t add much to the accuracy and would just unnecessarily add to the time and the costs.


It's not that shocking if you consider the results were very close for men and women and that the people surveyed likely represented retail investors, when the passive approach is often the most rewarding (just buy and hold). I'm sure the results would be largely different for professional investors.

Surveys are not always true, in Singapore maybe women traders can beat men, but I'm sure there will be many surveys where the results are reversed, this is what makes survey results no longer a way to seek truth, I'm sure that if surveys are conducted in African countries then male traders can beat women even in sara there are still few women who know trading.

I think that is still the average because that is big enough. You know those political polls that people consider the polls for elections? Those are usually around those numbers too, some higher of course but some are about that much. This is why we shouldn't really be shocked about it.

There are literally entire campaigns for worlds biggest nations just based on polls of 1500 people, or at most 3-4 thousand people. This is why I believe that you should consider that as average too. Sure there could be a bit changes, there is probably enough changes to make them closer as well. But in the end it will not be too much different from this, it will be something that is close to this result and not wildly different, 1500 is good enough sample size.

It varies actually because not all women in some parts of the world or country do really have that kind of approach on things around.Some would be focus into other things which they do go in line with those masculine activities but honestly it isnt really just that limited to men alone.It is really just that on the mindset that it is really just right for men but actually there are women who do really deal up with things which mostly done by men and lets talk about trading then there's no gender prohibition or restriction on this one which it could really be freely be engage whether you are a boy or girl. Community do really just have that kind of impression that this one is really just good for men to be dealing off with.

We do have other some key areas on which women is actively dealing and better than men, which does signify that they are really that capable on what men could do. This is why
its not really just that right on sticking into our mind or mentality.There might be some key areas which been overtaken but we know that those surveys or polls are just
that small part of the picture. Male is still dominant no matter what.

i remember that one of my colleagues is a female trader and she is quite consistent in making profit from her trading. She said why women can “be more successful” consistent profit is because women are more patient than men. usually women will TP when they feel they have had enough, in contrast to men who tend to be impatient and keep their positions open even when they are already profitable.

It kind of is unusual, if we're talking about active trading (or speculation if you will). As men are naturally less emotional and more analytical, they are more driven into active trading. As a result, there are way more men traders than women, and the top of traders (with the best results) would likely be men in a vast majority.
But the survey discussed here covers more of a passive traders (so more of a holders than speculators), where patience and a passive approach often turns out to be an advantage.

It's not uncommon for women to beat men in trading, usually women are more thorough and patient, it's only natural that most companies are dominated by women, another factor that allows women to beat men when trading is that women don't want to lose money while men make quick decisions even though loss.

Not sure what is the issue here , when a crypto traders aren't  really in competition instead we are all here to help the spread of crypto and to let people understand whats best for all of us.
Women are good in everything and they can compete with boys  nowadays .
and I am happy seeing them growing,  outperforming man isn't really an issue instead the capacity of which to trade and earn .

Usually girls are more careful and can be patient in trading, for example if a girl wants to bid on a price then she can be patient to keep bidding, while men are impatient and immediately buy or sell, it's natural that when trading girls can beat men.

these surveys are often very misleading, there are 1500 people who participated in the survey, it is a very small number and it was not a survey carried out in all of Singapore, according to google Singapore has a population of 5.454 million, but only 1500 people participated in the survey, I think that if more people had been asked we would have discovered the obvious: men are the ones who are most at the computer looking at the charts and trading, and it makes no sense to say that women are much more interested in trading cryptocurrencies, whether in any country, this will be absurd

It doesn't take a lot of genius to figure this out, all of us here on the forum have neighbors, we have friends, we have relatives, from now on and just look at how many women and men who are your friends, relatives and neighbors buy cryptocurrencies constantly, do day trade and invest for the long term. you will get the answer which to me is a very obvious answer. many politicians are creating a narrative that women are like men, but in practice this is not true and will never be true, I agree that in terms of laws women and men should be equal, they should have the same salaries, they should have the same job opportunities, in sport they should also have the same opportunities as men

but that does not mean that men and women are the same, there are things that women are much better than men and there are also things that men are much better than women, in this part of investing in cryptocurrencies, doing day trade men are undoubtedly the majority

Genuinely curious on how so-called "progressives" like yourself view the world. Do you deny that there are notable differences between genders other than physical appearance? Are you not aware of differences in IQ distribution for men and women? Is it sexist to you to point out that both genders, on average (key word here) have different interests and naturally gravitate towards different fields? How do you reconcile that some fields are vastly dominated by women while others by men - is it all due to patriarchal/matriarchal oppression or lack of "encouragement"?

Didn't some octopus beat all sports tipsters in some world cup some ages ago? Sample size, lack of ability to repeat the results. No error margins. I just love pseudo science, don't we all?


Actually, the whole story was about women doing the opposite of what men do: gamble away their crypto (just a joke, it's all hogwash).

I like the mindset of women there. Very different compare to other Asian countries where women got pregnant early. No wonder there are more women who are involved in crypto than in men. Instead of posting useless stuffs on social media, they use it for posting meaningful content and this helps the people on their network to get influenced on crypto if they haven't tried it yet.

Women are showing that they can also do what usually the men can only do. This is great. Time will come that women will not be underestimated anymore and they will now be respected by the men. I wish to see a similar improvement on other parts of the countries.

We dont know on what are actual numbers but it would really be just that understandable that this crypto market is surely been composed by most men who had been dealing up with this market.
There would be no exact numbers or something that could really be that in precise digits but somewhat there are really that women who do engage too on this market which is understandable.

Dealing up with market or would really be that facing up some huge risks on a volatile market will really be not that needing that feminine approach which we know that women are really that
keen when it comes to risks taking. Doesnt matter though on what gender you do have because it would really be basing or depending on risks apetite.

Not all would really be having the same level of risk taking because there are ones who do prefer on playing safe and there are ones who do love to gamble up but of course
on a strategic manner.

Yes, there is no difference between men and women in crypto. But in general crypto was dominated by men but now the news of women has encouraged crypto lovers even more. Women are no longer behind men. Women in various countries around the world, including Singapore, have now started crypto trading and have been able to do it quite efficiently. Due to which their number is going to increase gradually. If their number continues to grow, Bitcoin will become more expensive in the future as well as become more valuable assets in the world.