Topic: Crypto X Change - Public message regarding alt chains (Read 7766 times)
Quick Update on our launch plans, please see thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-x-change-launch-announcement-48598
They like doxxing people. I didnt enjoy it when they doxxed me either. I dont know if I would trust my coins to flash memory like a pen drive either.
Cool. Can you give the link?
I am still pretty confused with the fact you claimed to be RealSolid only to deny it later.
A nice little dox would help making you look more orthodox.
His posted some verifiable info about himself here. Business registration records exist for him both as a company and as a sole trader.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.573991
As a business, our goal is to become the primary Bitcoin exchange. Our goal is long-term profit and success. To achieve this, of course we must make every effort to be the most stable/secure/efficient exchange. During our development over the past months, we saw the MtGox fiasco and the other hackings and security breaches. We are taking these things very seriously. We have the most to lose from a security breech, and the interests of ourselves and our customers are strongly aligned in this regard.
I just hope you realise the very people coming to you now as polite, "impartial" advisors and whispering poison in your ear about Solidcoin are the very same people that are responsible for those hacks, scams, security "breeches" (sic) and attacks?
Perhaps you will look back upon this time and realise this, perhaps not. Just wanted to put it out there.
In what way are they responsible for mt gox being hacked ?
Oh, this thread, and others about Solidcoin is all about spewing some unsubstantiated lies and have everyone believe in them without any kind of proof whatsoever. If it works for BCX why can't it work for others?
As a business, our goal is to become the primary Bitcoin exchange. Our goal is long-term profit and success. To achieve this, of course we must make every effort to be the most stable/secure/efficient exchange. During our development over the past months, we saw the MtGox fiasco and the other hackings and security breaches. We are taking these things very seriously. We have the most to lose from a security breech, and the interests of ourselves and our customers are strongly aligned in this regard.
I just hope you realise the very people coming to you now as polite, "impartial" advisors and whispering poison in your ear about Solidcoin are the very same people that are responsible for those hacks, scams, security "breeches" (sic) and attacks?
Perhaps you will look back upon this time and realise this, perhaps not. Just wanted to put it out there.
In what way are they responsible for mt gox being hacked ?
As a business, our goal is to become the primary Bitcoin exchange. Our goal is long-term profit and success. To achieve this, of course we must make every effort to be the most stable/secure/efficient exchange. During our development over the past months, we saw the MtGox fiasco and the other hackings and security breaches. We are taking these things very seriously. We have the most to lose from a security breech, and the interests of ourselves and our customers are strongly aligned in this regard.
I just hope you realise the very people coming to you now as polite, "impartial" advisors and whispering poison in your ear about Solidcoin are the very same people that are responsible for those hacks, scams, security "breeches" (sic) and attacks?
Perhaps you will look back upon this time and realise this, perhaps not. Just wanted to put it out there.
We have the most to lose from a security breech, and the interests of ourselves and our customers are strongly aligned in this regard.
You mean, because CryptoX is backed by the parent company? IE, the parent company absorbs the loss if there's a security breach?
Crypto X Change has liability insurance to cover losses, but the point was that if security breaches happen, we lose the trust of our customers. Our significant investment in the exchange is put in jeopardy if we lose trust (this principle is true of most legitimate companies but in the Bitcoin world even more so).
We have the most to lose from a security breech, and the interests of ourselves and our customers are strongly aligned in this regard.
You mean, because CryptoX is backed by the parent company? IE, the parent company absorbs the loss if there's a security breach?
our goal is to become the primary Bitcoin exchange
booo... I would prefer a goal of becoming the most reliable, secure, stable, efficient, etc bitcoin exchange, but also would rather prefer for all exchanges to strive for best reliability, best security, best stability, best efficiency, best etc and to not necessarily compete with one another for superiority but instead even helping to promote those others that are superiorly equal due to strivances for best offering of service to consumers.
However, it is not responsibility of each exchange to promote one another's established quality of service in all aspects.
As a business, our goal is to become the primary Bitcoin exchange. Our goal is long-term profit and success. To achieve this, of course we must make every effort to be the most stable/secure/efficient exchange. During our development over the past months, we saw the MtGox fiasco and the other hackings and security breaches. We are taking these things very seriously. We have the most to lose from a security breech, and the interests of ourselves and our customers are strongly aligned in this regard.
I don't know why, I am getting the same gut feeling as when the Pattaya story started to turn sour, and Bruce Wagner appeared revelation after revelation as someone completely different. There is a gigantic amount of bullshit orbiting SolidCoin, and gravity pull is getting stronger and stronger. Highly advisable not to stick around when all the crap hits the ground.
Also - we were initially a bit worried this was turning into a witch hunt. But, our early skeptics have been quite polite and professional over the last 24 hrs and this is encouraging, so thank you!
Witch hunts are quite common (and IMO necessary) around here. They lose steam quickly if its unfounded.
I was a CryptoX sceptic, but after a few PM's they've shown (to me at least) that they're giving an honest effort to produce a legitimate exchange.
Best of luck, CryptoX!
Why is Ken Armitt in the about box for SolidCoin v2.0 if he has no connection to SolidCoin? 
OOooo someone getting trolled.
OOooo someone getting trolled.My name was also added without consultation. As was Ken's.
CryptoX should speak up to confirm/deny Ken's involvement.
But seeing as how one name was added w/o consultation...
CH is on a fail rampage folks, watch out!
Ken's name should not have been put in any "about box" for SolidCoin, not sure why that was done. No permission was given for such a thing. As BitcoinMedia mentioned, his name was also used in this way, again without permission. CoinHunter - may we request that you remove our name and references to us from your software?
Crypto X Change has been in development for several months. Part of our development was testing it with alt chains, and we did test with Solidcoin 1. After that went down, we had tested with SC2. The head of our company, Ken, was in contact with CoinHunter to advise on such testing.
Again - our exchange will not be supporting Solidcoin at launch, or any time in the foreseeable future. If at some point we think the marketplace really demands Solidcoin trading, then we'll consider it like all other alt chains. "The marketplace" doesn't mean a handful of people requesting it, of course.
Also - we were initially a bit worried this was turning into a witch hunt. But, our early skeptics have been quite polite and professional over the last 24 hrs and this is encouraging, so thank you!
Why is Ken Armitt in the about box for SolidCoin v2.0 if he has no connection to SolidCoin? OOooo someone getting trolled.
OOooo someone getting trolled.My name was also added without consultation. As was Ken's.
CryptoX should speak up to confirm/deny Ken's involvement. (Edit: As CH is specifically making the claim that Ken was involved)
But seeing as how one name was added w/o consultation...
CH is on a fail rampage folks, watch out!
Why is Ken Armitt in the about box for SolidCoin v2.0 if he has no connection to SolidCoin? OOooo someone getting trolled.
OOooo someone getting trolled.My name was also added without consultation. As was Ken's.
Why is Ken Armitt in the about box for SolidCoin v2.0 if he has no connection to SolidCoin? OOooo someone getting trolled.
OOooo someone getting trolled.I dunno. Since you put it there, why don't you tell us?
Oh wait. I get it. Yet again you don't have anything of substance.
Umad so sad
Why is Ken Armitt in the about box for SolidCoin v2.0 if he has no connection to SolidCoin? OOooo someone getting trolled.
OOooo someone getting trolled. Solidcoin doesn't need Crypto-Xchanger to survive, but it would be nice if they would show their support rather than listening to people with a hidden agenda.
That's why SC isn't on CryptoX - they're showing their support for people w/o a hidden agenda
PS: U mad
The Bitcoin trolls do seem to have a lot of money to throw around to get people to support the shitty altcoins they create. BTC-E has only added their currencies because they have paid them to do so. I suspect Crypto-Xchange is in the same position, being offered a large bribe to accept Litecoin.
These guys have made a lot of money through early mining and still have a buttload of Bitcoins they need to offload, so Solidcoin coming along and making Bitcoin look like the piece of crap that it really is is potentially very damaging to the value of their biggest remaining asset, the massive amounts of Bitcoin they still hold.
The alternative chains they are creating now are nothing more than a cheap and easy way to pump and dump a secondary market and increase their overall holding of Bitcoins.
Solidcoin is the only alt coin which has had a significant number of people mining it right from the start, so there are no pump and dump early adopters waiting in the shadows. The "pre-mined" coins BTCExpress likes to mention in every single post are in fact un-spendable by design, and are simply there to facilitate the 51% attack protection.
Solidcoin doesn't need Crypto-Xchanger to survive, but it would be nice if they would show their support rather than listening to people with a hidden agenda.
These guys have made a lot of money through early mining and still have a buttload of Bitcoins they need to offload, so Solidcoin coming along and making Bitcoin look like the piece of crap that it really is is potentially very damaging to the value of their biggest remaining asset, the massive amounts of Bitcoin they still hold.
The alternative chains they are creating now are nothing more than a cheap and easy way to pump and dump a secondary market and increase their overall holding of Bitcoins.
Solidcoin is the only alt coin which has had a significant number of people mining it right from the start, so there are no pump and dump early adopters waiting in the shadows. The "pre-mined" coins BTCExpress likes to mention in every single post are in fact un-spendable by design, and are simply there to facilitate the 51% attack protection.
Solidcoin doesn't need Crypto-Xchanger to survive, but it would be nice if they would show their support rather than listening to people with a hidden agenda.
In retrospect, maybe creating a giant placenta to allow the wealthy to recover their youth isn't what the world needs the most...
It's for everyone. All people of planet earth. I'm not saying that you should not be doing what you are doing.
It's the standard in our world to somehow disregard the problem, find a justification to procrastinate, and continue doing our business as usual.
So I can't blame you not to take action right now, at least not unless I myself walk my talk, take a flight to Africa, and go help these children out of their misery
Simply, please be aware that you can't use against a single person an argument that so blatantly applies to all of us.
Hopefully distributed crypto-currencies will enable fair trade by shortcuting layers of profiteering middlemen.
But that is only if we don't fall again in the old mistake of entrusting a couple of people with the power to decide on behalf of us.
You make valid points. You lose credibility by playing an unnecessary "Think of the poor starving kids" card.
Because most of us are working hard to get out of the rat race, get out of debt, get a stable place to live etc so that then we can start helping out the rest of the people
in the world. Sure I could probably post a pic like that for anything. Like when some idiot drops 50k on a SUV.
Yes, you can argue it was uncalled for but I have already posted it and i'm not retracting it. People work really hard in shitty jobs all over the world to fund the life styles of the top 1% here. Seems to me
its just the same shit here as it is in the real world. Sad we will all be torn apart and this community will come to an end and we'll all be fighting the worlds real elites on our own.
So, are you going to do something about that?
If you do and you offer the proper level of transparency, I will be glad to participate at my modest scale.
Yeah, part of my rejuvepedia project was going to help rejuvenate the land, soil and water so that people all over the world could grow enough food.
In retrospect, maybe creating a giant placenta to allow the wealthy to recover their youth isn't what the world needs the most...
It's for everyone. All people of planet earth.
Jump to: