Not sure if this has been asked before but I'd like to know (pretty sure lot of players would have this question too) how crypto-games.net have planned to handle the transactions incase we suffer a hard fork?
I assume you're asking about BIP148, an UASF and the connected chance of a chain split, rather than a hard fork (eg connected to BCC / ViaBTC and AntPools UAHF proposal).This indeed has been asked many times before, and there've been several statements regarding the situation, the latest of which can be found here:
Read about our BIP148/UASF contingency plan on our blog.
Although the risk of hard fork is quite low but since we have investor funds and bitcoin transactions all day long, we must have a plan right?
CryptoGames is preparred to handle all possible outcomes.That being said, we're currently a few blocks away from BIP91 locking in and by the looks of it, BIP148 won't activate given the current situation.
It's a rapidly changing situation, but we keep everyone updated of the current status and resulting actions.
Having said that,I know it would be handled the most efficient way possible.
For now, this means increasing the required amount of confirmations on deposits to 3 and 6 (3 for playing, 6 for withdrawing).Hopefully not neccessary, and a minor inconvenience for players, but better to be secure than risking to be vulnerable.
